Wait wait wait.. Where's the shifter? Is this one of them flappy paddle jobbies?
Yes. That should have been known the moment they had said this was going to be using SH-AWD & incorporate a DCT.Wait wait wait.. Where's the shifter? Is this one of them flappy paddle jobbies?
Now's the time to get a real NSX before the market blows up.
Now's the time to get a real NSX before the market blows up.
Don't tempt to make an expensive impulse buy.
Just. Don't.
I wanted one 20 years ago... it wouldn't be an impulse buy
I'm gonna throw this out there - the original NSX was never anything other than fairly generic to look at. And not even slightly nicely detailed, since Japan didn't know how to do nice detailing until about three years ago.
The original NSX was always important for what it was, rather than what it looked like.
Sure, you can jazz it up a bit with nice wheels, and it does look tidy in late-model Type R spec, but it's no design classic and certainly no more stand-out in its day than the new NSX is now. And the interior was an Aladdin's cave of shiny black plastic. Methinks there's a lot of rose-tinted spectacles being worn when discussing the original car...
I'm gonna throw this out there - the original NSX was never anything other than fairly generic to look at. And not even slightly nicely detailed, since Japan didn't know how to do nice detailing until about three years ago.
The original NSX was always important for what it was, rather than what it looked like.
Sure, you can jazz it up a bit with nice wheels, and it does look tidy in late-model Type R spec, but it's no design classic and certainly no more stand-out in its day than the new NSX is now. And the interior was an Aladdin's cave of shiny black plastic. Methinks there's a lot of rose-tinted spectacles being worn when discussing the original car...
Which is why I feel it might be a little unfair saying the new one looks a bit bland. Surely, like the original NSX, it's the clever engineering electrickery beneath the surface that makes it a true NSX... the styling is just a shell to work their magic beneath.
Here we go with the "....it looks like such and such car." comments. C'mon, yall. The car is mid-engined, and of course will bare a passing similarity to any others out there. But other than that, they don't look like copies of one another. And I don't think even the least educated will assume it's an R8, even at first glance, thanks to Audi's unique front and rear lamp designs.
What I meant was that they could have used this opportunity to do both this time, I gave the example of the 2006 Civic (not the current one and only the hatchback) to show they are capable of doing innovative styling as well, this NSX clearly still has some of the same styling cues introduced since that Civic but doesn't take it to the next stage (no current Honda seems to do though, apart from the CR-Z) or makes it its own (and yes, I do think the overall dimensions and proportions resemble an R8 which a lot of other mid-engined cars don't).
You can simply say the NSX wasn't about that and it shouldn't be important how it looks but if this car succeeds or not depends as well on how people perceive its looks (now perhaps much more than in the early nineties when they perhaps had to be a bit conservative to establish the NSX or Acura as a brand, copying familiar aspects of other mid-engined cars in its styling).
The supposed NSX-successor, the cancelled front-engined HSV-concept looked great, that's why I'm surprised this NSX ended up looking like it does.
It isn't that it's bland or vaguely resembles other cars, it's just that it appears to me to be a bit inbetween styling directions, on the one hand a safe (dare I say 'me too') overall shape with some odd and awkward angles and lines added which suggests an attempt to make it look different or daring.
At least the original NSX was coherent yet a bit dull and its single unique design element (the long rear overhang) was due to practical concerns (to fit a set of golfbags in the booth...).
I agree that they should have stuck with the previous V10 Concept NSX styling, but it was a departure from the previous model (engine placement, etc). So I can understand the change, I suppose.
I see wayyyy too much R8 than NSX.Just me that thinks a lot more like an NSX now?
Ah, then it's a revenge buy.
Not that I haven't been tempted by every Acura dealers visit...
No, because in 1991, that could have covered 3/4 of the cost of the 348. The NSX was priced around $55-60,000 when it arrived.When they first came out in 1991, they went for like $75-$80,000 right? I remember walking into a Acura dealer in 2002 because my dad was shopping around, and I gawked at the NSX in the showroom until I saw the price tag, which was $105,000. Granted, dealers do mark up low run cars like these.