Do you have a problem with Pence's peaceful protest of Kaepernick's action?
I had a problem with it only because that show of his cost the taxpayers money it didn't need to be spending. If he'd paid for all the security and what not out of his own pocket, then by all means walk out.
I see your point, and somewhat agree with it, but wouldn't he have had pretty much the same size security detail no matter where he went in public?
He ignored pleas for help against oppression and brutality and now he tries to pretend he's virtuous and honourable. He's a two faced POS who is too stupid to understand he's part of the problem.Do you have a problem with Pence's peaceful protest of Kaepernick's action?
Taking the premise for granted;
Not very fair, since God is presumably one of his phone-a-friends...
He ignored pleas for help against oppression and brutality and now he tries to pretend he's virtuous and honourable. He's a two faced POS who is too stupid to understand he's part of the problem.
Sure he's allowed to butSo because he's a stupid POS he's not allowed to protest anything?
Wow, you're really all for First Amendment rights but only if you agree with what's being said, right?
BTW you never did answer @Joey D's question. Why is that?
You're doing it again. It isn't actually necessary to use the "you're saying" part to employ that particular bad faith debate tactic. It's enough to misrepresent remarks as something they are not.So because he's a stupid POS he's not allowed to protest anything?
You or I--indeed anyone else--may be critical of anything anyone says and doing so doesn't infringe on rights afforded to them by the First Amendment. The First Amendment holds that Congress may pass no law. It's all about protection from abuse of power.Wow, you're really all for First Amendment rights but only if you agree with what's being said, right?
I'm not sure I understand this. Why is China supposed to bee pleased people are supposedly no no longer talking about it?
I'm not sure I understand this. Why is China supposed to bee pleased people are supposedly no no longer talking about it?
But why are they supposed to be happy about it? I get that they actively engaged in deception, but is it not being headline news actually something they can be reasonably said to desire?The Chinese government hive mind is just happy there's no longer any buzz about it.
But why are they supposed to be happy about it? I get that they actively engaged in deception, but is it not being headline news actually something they can be reasonably said to desire?
Also, the world doesn't stop turning so easily. People aren't not talking about coronavirus just because something else is happening. People aren't even not talking about it in the United States where that something else is happening.
As an aside, I appreciate your additions. I didn't know for sure what I slipped into my response would be noticed.
Okay, that seems like a whole lot to read into the situation but I'm not going to beat a dead horse any longer. I think the most I can get behind without more information is that China, as a world power having not the best relationship with the United States (or any other world power apart fromI think they're just happy the focus is off them for the moment since I get the feeling the Chinese government doesn't want to talk about it. They also like to deflect anytime it comes up too by saying it's a US conspiracy or some other asinine thing. They're also probably happy that the unrest in the US and now many places in the Western World is also taking away the spotlight from Hong Kong too.