- 5,588
- Dahlonega, GA
- ryzno
Ain't it. Where the masks?
Amazing.
Vaccinated getting sick too
Last edited:
Ain't it. Where the masks?
Amazing.
@Danoff already addressed this.Ain't it. Where the masks?
At no point was the vaccine called a cure. That being said, a lot fewer people would be getting sick if there wasn't so much pushback against the vaccine in the first place.Vaccinated getting sick too
There's this weird logic (that's not the appropriate word but it will have to do) on the right wherein the response to a dynamic situation has to be static and any change to the response is deemed to be hypocritical. This is no better illustrated than their highlighting early calls to reserve a limited supply of masks for those on the ground responding to the sick as reason to question mask use when they are readily available.At no point was the vaccine called a cure. That being said, a lot fewer people would be getting sick if there wasn't so much pushback against the vaccine in the first place.
You seem incapable of not straw-manning every argument you get into, recently....Why's it ok for them after a reinstated mask mandate? Oh yeah NBA=much money. What you about Obumas party the other day? The video of AOC asking everyone to put their mask on for a photo shoot while laughing and talking to them 2 minutes earlier...
Hypocrisy at its finest.
I couldn't pinpoint when it started, but I know it's not recent. You're probably only recently picking up on it.You seem incapable of not straw-manning every argument you get into, recently....
I feel like your signature couldn't be more relevant - and I say that as a compliment.
I should say that the image may have been faked. It's certainly believable that it's real. But I thought it was funny and I posted it.I feel like your signature couldn't be more relevant - and I say that as a compliment.
So in your opinion, what would it have taken for the events in the US Capital on January 6th to escalate to the level of insurrection?
The sign said, "You've got to have a membership card to get inside"What are the odds he actually responds?
Edit:
View attachment 1074897
"The sign said 'long-haired freaky people need not apply'"The sign said, "You've got to have a membership card to get inside"
And the sign said "Anybody caught trespassin' will be shot on sight"
So in your opinion, what would it have taken for the events in the US Capital on January 6th to escalate to the level of insurrection?
emphasis addedInsurrection Law and Legal Definition https://definitions.uslegal.com/i/insurrection/
Insurrection refers to an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government. It is a violent revolt against an oppressive authority. Insurrection is different from riots and offenses connected with mob violence. In insurrection there is an organized and armed uprising against authority or operations of government whereas riots and offenses connected with mob violence are simply unlawful acts in disturbance of the peace which do not threaten the stability of the government or the existence of political society.
The following is a case law defining Insurrection:
Insurrection means “a violent uprising by a group or movement acting for the specific purpose of overthrowing the constituted government and seizing its powers. An insurrection occurs where a movement acts to overthrow the constituted government and to take possession of its inherent powers.” [Younis Bros. & Co. v. Cigna Worldwide Ins. Co., 899 F. Supp. 1385, 1392-1393 (E.D. Pa. 1995)]
Tourists. No, antifa. Wait, that was self defense. He was choking and there's a special horizontal Heimlich maneuver utilizing a nightstick.
Interesting how we can read the exact same definition and come to two completely different conclusions.emphasis addedInsurrection Law and Legal Definition https://definitions.uslegal.com/i/insurrection/
Insurrection refers to an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government. It is a violent revolt against an oppressive authority. Insurrection is different from riots and offenses connected with mob violence. In insurrection there is an organized and armed uprising against authority or operations of government whereas riots and offenses connected with mob violence are simply unlawful acts in disturbance of the peace which do not threaten the stability of the government or the existence of political society.
The following is a case law defining Insurrection:
Insurrection means “a violent uprising by a group or movement acting for the specific purpose of overthrowing the constituted government and seizing its powers. An insurrection occurs where a movement acts to overthrow the constituted government and to take possession of its inherent powers.” [Younis Bros. & Co. v. Cigna Worldwide Ins. Co., 899 F. Supp. 1385, 1392-1393 (E.D. Pa. 1995)]
You think those guys intended on taking over anything? I mean, maybe the guy with the Viking hat wanted to run the War department. And the guy in Nancy's chair, I guess he could of been planning on running the legislative branch, but I kind of doubt it.
“worst attack on democracy since the Civil War" my ass
Amazing how they showed up from all across America at the same time hours after Trumps post ain't it.No way was it organised. All those patriots showed up in the same place at the same time by cosmic chance.
It would have taken just fifteen seconds to preempt clowning yourself the way you Trumpers so readily do.Amazing how they showed up from all across America at the same time hours after Trumps post ain't it.
I know! It was mostly peaceful!emphasis added
You think those guys intended on taking over anything? I mean, maybe the guy with the Viking hat wanted to run the War department. And the guy in Nancy's chair, I guess he could of been planning on running the legislative branch, but I kind of doubt it.
“worst attack on democracy since the Civil War" my ass
So you're sticking around.I know! It was mostly peaceful!
View attachment 1074908
Seems to be literal argument being brought up.Fake because it didn't succeed?
Oh, look, it's you again. Same as before, whataboutism and deflection doesn't work here.I know! It was mostly peaceful!
View attachment 1074908
That photo sure does accurately describe the worst of the capitol riots. It definitely got no worse than people walking through velvet ropes. This is, in no way, a complete misrepresentation of what we all know. [/s]I know! It was mostly peaceful!
View attachment 1074908
They were trying to keep trump in office so... yes, they were indeed trying to "run" something.emphasis added
You think those guys intended on taking over anything? I mean, maybe the guy with the Viking hat wanted to run the War department. And the guy in Nancy's chair, I guess he could of been planning on running the legislative branch, but I kind of doubt it.
“worst attack on democracy since the Civil War" my ass