- 3,774
- Hoboken, New Jersey
The two wrongs being bank bailouts and profiteering universities.Two wrongs don't make a right.
What you said about education is more applicable towards bank bailouts.I thought we were talking about a tweet?
Nope, goalposts shifted. If the topic is handing out taxpayer money, as it is, the two wrongs are handing out taxpayer money to financial institutions that demonstrate moral hazard and handing out taxpayer money to profiteering univerties with students merely serving as middlemen.The two wrongs being bank bailouts and profiteering universities.
That clever little asterisk “merely serving as middlemen” bit is wrongfully minimized and very undervalued. It means millions of students continuing their education after high school and millions more graduating without crippling life long debt.Nope, goalposts shifted. If the topic is handing out taxpayer money, as it is, the two wrongs are handing out taxpayer money to financial institutions that demonstrate moral hazard and handing out taxpayer money to profiteering univerties with students merely serving as middlemen.
If the problem is greedy people, you don't fix that problem by feeding it.
...
Secondary education is a purchase. Just like every other purchase, it's not a wise one to make if you don't expect you'll be able to afford it. It's also not something you enter into ignorant of the costs.That clever little asterisk “merely serving as middlemen” bit is wrongfully minimized and very undervalued. It means millions of students continuing their education after high school and millions more graduating without crippling life long debt.
Corporate welfare bankrolls the financial sector, petroleum industry, taxpayer money to the military and prison industrial complexes. $30 million golden parachutes for executives. But then when it comes time to help average Joey Citizen you get rich platitudes like “two wrongs don’t make a right”. What a funny coincidence that it’s right at this point where the buck happens to stop.
It means millions of students continuing their education after high school and millions more graduating without crippling life long debt.
You are exactly right. People are aware of the massive debt they’re taking on but feel it’s necessary to be able to compete in the job market.Secondary education is a purchase. Just like every other purchase, it's not a wise one to make if you don't expect you'll be able to afford it. It's also not something you enter into ignorant of the costs.
You're kidding yourself if you think "investing in my future" isn't itself a gamble.You are exactly right. People are aware of the massive debt they’re taking on but feel it’s necessary to be able to compete in the job market.
Countries with much higher standards of living spend their money on education instead of giving bankers free money to gamble with.
The results speak for themselves.
but feel it’s necessary to be able to compete in the job market.
Countries with much higher standards of living spend their money on education
But then when it comes time to help average Joey Citizen you get rich platitudes like “two wrongs don’t make a right”. What a funny coincidence that it’s right at this point where the buck happens to stop.
Nothing in the above shows that giving money to bank CEO’s is a better option than putting money into education.You're kidding yourself if you think "investing in my future" isn't itself a gamble.
It'd be nice if higher wages--ideally higher enough so that the investment is recouped and then some--as a result of that investment was a foregone conclusion, but it really isn't.
You also seem to be under the impression that you have no option but to leverage your livelihood to continue your education once you've graduated grade school. You don't. Community colleges are a very affordable option. As indicated in the post above yours, there are employers out there who are so desperate for people to fill positions that they're willing to pay for the education required.
That's a fair assessment of what's written...because I don't believe that to be the case.Nothing in the above shows that giving money to bank CEO’s is a better option than putting money into education.
Nothing in the above shows that giving money to bank CEO’s is a better option than putting money into education.
Not only is not a false dichotomy, it is governance at the most basic level. It is so foundational, that it applies to nearly all types of government, whether it be a democracy, monarchy, autocracy, plutocracy, theocracy etc.It's a false dichotomy.
Not only is not a false dichotomy
I suppose but I see it as a government has the choice to spend capital or not spend capital. Also, I can’t think of a nation which doesn’t spend on educationThat's going to take some detailed explaining seeing as how those are not the only two choices - that makes it a false dichotomy. For example, a third choice would be don't give money to either. See? False dichotomy.
I suppose but I see it as a government has the choice to spend capital or not spend capital. Also, I can’t think of a nation which doesn’t spend on education
We don’t have to choose anything at all, strictly speaking. But in the real world, that government will collapse pretty quickly.False dichotomy. We do not have to spend money on either the plane or the insulin or the college.