Ah the old 'cripple public services so we can profit off its privatization' scheme. How many more ways can that be finessedA state (or county) couldn't afford to build a new prison to reduce overcrowding in the public-funded one. So it contracted with a private firm to build a prison for them in exchange for a contract that said it would keep X% of the prison full. When the government couldn't fulfill that contract, it's no longer profitable for the private facility to keep operating. If it shuts down, that just means the government-funded facility will go back to be overcrowded. It's not a lack of supply and demand, it's a government not knowing how to manage its resources properly.
I believe something like 8% of prisoners are in private facilities and all those facilities have the same oversight as publicly funded prisons which is the Office of the Inspector General. It's not like we have a private prison problem in the US.
At least the original poster had the good grace to change her profile to say "I know, I'm bad at math"... though one could argue that this goes a tad beyond being bad at math and ventures into the "I'm not sure what numbers are" territory.
Totally. I'd never claim to be any good at math, but if I see hundreds of millions divided into hundreds of millions, I know the answer isn't going to have "million" at the end of it.At least the original poster had the good grace to change her profile to say "I know, I'm bad at math"... though one could argue that this goes a tad beyond being bad at math and ventures into the "I'm not sure what numbers are" territory.
Still, for a major news network to pick it up and run with it as a story and to not spot the error is flabbergasting.
Totally. I'd never claim to be any good at math, but if I see hundreds of millions divided into hundreds of millions, I know the answer isn't going to have "million" at the end of it.
It was a flub, but it was a BAD flub.