Top 3 Most Hated Cars

[Xx07gsxrxX]

A real size model that doesnt run...

But the technology is there, ont thing is redbull doesnt have any engineers to work on it. It obeys all laws of physics.

 

[Dan]

But the technology is there, ont thing is redbull doesnt have any engineers to work on it. It obeys all laws of physics.

Lets not forget it can pull 8G's around a corner... which most fighter pilots pass out at.

 

[Bo]

The R35 TC is outright broken. A touring car capable of setting sub-6 minute times on Nurburgring? Seems legit.

The 2011 N24 GT-R race car is amazing. The 2012 N24 GT-R is absolutely atrocious. In the short time I drove the 2013 N24 GT-R in the GT Academy demo, it seems like it's a big improvement over the crap 2012 car.

The one in the GT academy demo is a GT3 car, that's why. And yes, the '12 N24 is shocking at the 'Ring. I first drove it two corners before spinning, I thought i'd caught the grass. So I restarted, went two corners and just about held the biggest slide of my life. I don't get the feel of it, it's all nice and comforting... then goes completely psycho, spitting you off the road, then goes all calm again... It's terrifying! I don't have any worst cars, I can find value and purpose in all cars, if it is evil or just crap, that is part of its character and I like that.

 

[Xx07gsxrxX]

Lets not forget it can pull 8G's around a corner... which most fighter pilots pass out at.

Yes it may be able to but if they make them they wont have a track built that 8gs is possible with in the x1 and fighter pilots have special suits so they dont pass out at high gs. Improve that suit and even higher gs can be acheived.

 

[ITCC_Andrew]

Nope. The problem with the X1 is the ridiculous speeds it takes corners at.


If you go 400 km/h into a wall, there's not much that can save the body after such a high rate of deceleration.

"Going fast doesn't kill. Suddenly becoming stationary does." - Jeremy Clarkson.


The cornering speeds are ludicrous. If the car hits a curb, the car loses 90% of its grip. If you do that at Monaco, with no run-off room, you're dead.


Anyways, Top 3 hated cars:

1: X2011
2: Veyron
3: Tank Car

^ They're all ludicrously bad to drive, and I don't get the same sort of pleasure out of driving them. And, remember, I get pleasure out of driving some pretty challenging cars, like the Falcon XR8. It's just a testament to the bad handling of the Veyron that I find the Falcon XR8 Supercar easier to drive on Comfort Hards.

 

[Baltimore212]

Yes it may be able to but if they make them they wont have a track built that 8gs is possible with in the x1 and fighter pilots have special suits so they dont pass out at high gs. Improve that suit and even higher gs can be acheived.

lets also not forget that fighter pilots pass out at 8 gs even in the suits

 

[Xx07gsxrxX]

Just because they can take the corners that fast doesnt mean the have to. Hitting a wall in an f1 at 150 straight on will kill you. Still race them dont they?

 

[ITCC_Andrew]

Mate, it's not a real car and won't be for a very long time.


Also, hitting a wall in an F1 car at 150 km/h is not normally deadly.

 

[Xx07gsxrxX]

I meant mph forgot some people used kmh its about 240 kmh

 

[MoLiEG]

Only one: Toyota AE86 Trueno

I really, really dislike the Miata and the GTR, but I don't hate them...

 

[ITCC_Andrew]

Yeah. But F1 circuits are, for the most part, designed to have large run-off areas anywhere near a part of a circuit where the speeds are that high.


The only tracks that are excluded are: Monaco, and Valencia.


Otherwise, all of the circuits have run-off areas on the outside of the track. The cars will likely not hit the wall at 120 mph.

 

[Xx07gsxrxX]

Say the x1s would run the same tracks. They would be all good in the run off areas. The car would slow down very quick and then if no damage is done they can drive out slowly so they dont break traction instantly. And they can tune the cars down on a track with little eun off areas so that way they dont have to worry about drilling a wall at 400 kmh

 

[ITCC_Andrew]

It's besides the point:


It's dangerous. It doesn't matter what you do. It doesn't have a crumple zone. It doesn't have a "safe" design.

What it does have, is the ability to get into a crash that's bad enough to snap a human neck, even without leaving the racing surface. If you hit a curb, the car loses all grip and suddenly begins to float and hits the outside wall because even its fan can't pull it back down.

Not to mention if two X2011s collide into each other...


And, it's not exactly interesting watching a procession of cars that go past almost as fast as people can blink. They can't follow each other around a track. The pebbles picked up by one will be thrown, via the fan, into the canopy/windscreen of the car behind, and then bam! The driver will be hit by debris. I don't have to mention what happened to Massa, do I? Or, how about Senna? Senna's death was a result of his own steering tie-rod hitting him in the head, going right through his visor.

Let's say the tie-rod was thrown through the fan system on the Vettel car... Oops, same story.


Then, I'm going to let you find me a tire on google that can sustain the cornering load of 8.75 Gs.


Then, I'm going to let you find me a neck-protection system suitable for the driver's neck support during cornering.

While you're there, I'm going to ask you to tell me where you can find a G-suit capable of 8.75 Gs.



Oh, you can't. Your unsubstantiated claim "it's a real car" is not true.




On-topic: I'd switch the Tank Car off of my hated car list and put the Prius in. I really hate cars that don't have a gearbox with at least 4 forward gears. It's too confusing trying to guesstimate speed...

 

[Xx07gsxrxX]

It's besides the point:

It's dangerous. It doesn't matter what you do. It doesn't have a crumple zone. It doesn't have a "safe" design.

What it does have, is the ability to get into a crash that's bad enough to snap a human neck, even without leaving the racing surface. If you hit a curb, the car loses all grip and suddenly begins to float and hits the outside wall because even its fan can't pull it back down.

Not to mention if two X2011s collide into each other...

And, it's not exactly interesting watching a procession of cars that go past almost as fast as people can blink. They can't follow each other around a track. The pebbles picked up by one will be thrown, via the fan, into the canopy/windscreen of the car behind, and then bam! The driver will be hit by debris. I don't have to mention what happened to Massa, do I? Or, how about Senna? Senna's death was a result of his own steering tie-rod hitting him in the head, going right through his visor.

Let's say the tie-rod was thrown through the fan system on the Vettel car... Oops, same story.

Then, I'm going to let you find me a tire on google that can sustain the cornering load of 8.75 Gs.

Then, I'm going to let you find me a neck-protection system suitable for the driver's neck support during cornering.

While you're there, I'm going to ask you to tell me where you can find a G-suit capable of 8.75 Gs.

Oh, you can't. Your unsubstantiated claim "it's a real car" is not true.

On-topic: I'd switch the Tank Car off of my hated car list and put the Prius in. I really hate cars that don't have a gearbox with at least 4 forward gears. It's too confusing trying to guesstimate speed...

Just because it could do it. Doesnt mean someone has to. the veyron can do 200+ doesnt mean you have

 

[ITCC_Andrew]

So, if you were willing to spend millions of dollars on developing a car to compete with the X2011...


You'd go ahead and dial it back to have 100 hp?

I could show up with a well-tuned Daihatsu and beat your million dollar technology "masterpiece."

So, then, this makes the Daihatsu Copen Active Top a better car than your X2011, doesn't it? I could even take a girlfriend on board in the Copen. and they would love it, because it's the cutest car made, and not a ridiculous looking, dangerous car.


Sorry for applying logic.

 

[BlazeTheCat05]

Only one: Toyota AE86 Trueno

Oh boy...I can see a load of angry Initial D fans in the distance.
Brace yourself.

I'm seriously beginning to hate the Aventador, not because of the car itself, but the nutcases I come across online driving them. Some of them are hp-hacked to rediculous degrees (the 10,000 range...seriously?), but most are just plain AWFUL looking. I saw one earlier today painted the DLC Fluorescence purple with orange wheels. I wanted to hurl.

 

[Xx07gsxrxX]

So, if you were willing to spend millions of dollars on developing a car to compete with the X2011...

You'd go ahead and dial it back to have 100 hp?

I could show up with a well-tuned Daihatsu and beat your million dollar technology "masterpiece."

So, then, this makes the Daihatsu Copen Active Top a better car than your X2011, doesn't it? I could even take a girlfriend on board in the Copen. and they would love it, because it's the cutest car made, and not a ridiculous looking, dangerous car.

Sorry for applying logic.

No it wouldnt. it was tuned back to 100hp if put back to its potential hp the daihatsu wouldnt touch it. Nor the veyron, the second fastest street car in production.

 

[Dan]

lets also not forget that fighter pilots pass out at 8 gs even in the suits

Thank you for restating exactly what I just said. 👎

 

[GTV0819]

Oh boy...I can see a load of angry Initial D fans in the distance.
Brace yourself.

I'm seriously beginning to hate the Aventador, not because of the car itself, but the nutcases I come across online driving them. Some of them are hp-hacked to rediculous degrees (the 10,000 range...seriously?), but most are just plain AWFUL looking. I saw one earlier today painted the DLC Fluorescence purple with orange wheels. I wanted to hurl.

Did it look Barbie-like? Except it's not in pink. LOL

 

[Otaliema]

Just to play devils advocate with the x20xx cars.
The super high g turns are do able as they are not sustained for any length of time. Unlike fighter pilots who will sustain the turns for 10-30 seconds the driver would be in the high g for less than 5 seconds per in most cases. To address driver fatigue the races would be shorter.

Tires that can handle the car don't exist because they don't need too. If the car was real the tires would exist. Just look say 40 years ago, the tires from that time would dissolve on a modern race car after a dozen laps if that. Remember if it's not needed there is no reason to make it in the racing tire world, speed always comes before the tires in the developing sense.

Tracks could be designed to allow the cars to hit 400+ kph at a reduced risk to the crowd and drivers. Large run off areas high catch barriers (yes I know they are not fool proof). And any track that can't be built for that would have speed limits and or power limits to reduce risks.

To help keep the drivers from taking corners at top speed something as simple a vented track could be installed in the corners effectively reducing the duct fan on the car to less than half strength, Similar to a laminar flow aircraft wing, strong smooth and full of holes.

As for debris from the fan, that could addressed as well, just not sure how right off hand, if it's a kick up off the track, something similar to a "mud flap" could be designed, if it's due the duct fan exhaust just put a debris catch in it that gets emptied with each pit stop.

 

[sparkytooth]

Time to input:

1. Ferrari Enzo Ferrari. Never before had I found a 1mil cr car so useless.

2. The NSX Type R. It will beat anything at any class from stock all the way to maxed out, it's like playing Oddjob on Goldeneye 64 . I only ever use this machine when the room is a cheapfest.

3. Tommy Kaira ZZ-II. An AWD NSX Type R that can reach up to 600pp

 

[GTV0819]

^^I thought the NSX was one of your faves.

 

[sparkytooth]

^^I thought the NSX was one of your faves.

It is a rather nice machine, but on GT5, it just feels too cheap for online racing. I still have two for the cheapfest scenarios though.

 

[Voxalizer]

1. Chapparal 2J
2. Suzuki GSX
3. Any version of the Red Bull X cars.

I hate these first two cars because they are overused in online TTs so much. Number 3 I hate because all those hackers use it in TTs to ruin the leaderboards.

 

[WWE907]

Oh boy...I can see a load of angry Initial D fans in the distance.
Brace yourself.

I'm seriously beginning to hate the Aventador, not because of the car itself, but the nutcases I come across online driving them. Some of them are hp-hacked to rediculous degrees (the 10,000 range...seriously?), but most are just plain AWFUL looking. I saw one earlier today painted the DLC Fluorescence purple with orange wheels. I wanted to hurl.

Ugh, tell me about it. I don't mind the visual hacks (some cars look better without a spoiler), but the HP hacks drive me nuts.

 

[Man of Mister]

1. Red Bull X2010 S. Vettel - They are too widely available. One does not get to B-Spec Level 35 and win a FREE X2010 S. Vettel.
2. Bugatti Veyron 16.4 '09 - They do go fast, I'll give then that. But speed is nothing without handling.
3. Daihatsu MIRA TR-XX Avanzato R '97 - I've hated these since the beginning of time.

 

[TheLazyDonkey]

I remember reading an article some where that those " 8g" max statements are for up an down( brain fart for the word), the body can actually Handel over 50g's eyeballs in (acceleration), 25 eyes out ( deceleration ), and 35 side to side.

I also remember that the average person can Handel around 15g in any direction otherthan than up and down.

I also read that some professor forced him self to 108gs eyes in and survived with minor brain injury. (It was on a rocket sled, like the one in the crystal scull )

For my most hated,
1 Enzo; not worth it
2, new mustang; crapy all around
3 nsx; too many are found online

 

[Jaywalker]

Mine:

Veyron (It's crappy handling - even Praiano can't get it right)
Mazda Autozam (That SOUND!)
X1 ('Nuff said)

 

[f_zamataki]

1 - Same repeating cars of the same series like multiple Skyline (R32, R33, R34), RX-7 FD3S (Type RZ, RS etc), Roadster/Miata/MX-5s.
I like them BUT having a different variation is just stupid. At least keep the latest version of the car (like RZ Kouki, RZ Zenki, Type R Zenki, Type R Kouki. Instead of year difference and no different domestic market like US, EUR, blah blah Variation).

2- Favorite cars that turns out to have incorrect stuff/info.
One of my favorite cars feel like total crap in the game. Which is the AE86. Car doesn't only feel like crap compared to RL but weight distribution is incorrect (it's 53:47, not FF typical 60:40).
There's even some errors on cars that actually handle quite good like the Amuse S2000 R1/Street Version. In the description info; it says it's a front lip when it's actually a front bumper with downforce. Also since the R1 has a 4.500 Final Drive and it's base car is a AP1 '01 S2000. The S2000 (US) '04 is also incorrect as it's suppose to have a 2.2L and refined transmission like a '06 model

3 - X20xx cars.
They ruined not only the game but manage to get some kids to make some stupid stuff on hybrids. Ruined it for those who made realistic hybrids back in 2.11.



LOL Please think of Japan when it comes to Hondas..

In Japan..."We tune Hondas for racing purposes and for great balance"
Mean awhile in most part of North America...."VTEC JUST KICKED IN YO! LET'S GET THOSE GUYS".

It's a game..not like you're dying in real life. Real life is worst when it gets filled with typical Honda kids (only few I know who tune them right for good purpose in N.A. is Comptech, Top Setup, Hasport, etc).

FF cars are fine, extreme stability and mid-corner adjustability are desired features in any race car. To exploit these advantages one must learn to drive with the understeer instead of against it.

The programmers at polyphony did a top job of keeping the ff cars competitive in gt5, just as they are irl. Theres many videos of civics and other ffs slaying higher end sports cars around circuits. Its simply a matter of tuning combined with driving technique.

Having said that, i understand that they are limited, but so is everything else. I find anything above 505pp is pushing it for an ff, so anything around or above that i usually take out an mr or fr, unless the lobby is a bit slower its fun to win in a field of ferraris and such with an ff.
Anything below 480pp is where they truly shine, even more so if you factor out racing tires.

Those who have anything negative to say about ff and honda in general are just butthurt.

 

[perrolocomcquee]

Almost every FWD(specially Celica SSII,mmr-Cupcar, Lupo Cupcar) car plus Ferrari Enzo and F430/SP1(Understeery craps) and Z33(feels like a custard with that soft suspension, Z34 is 1000times better)