Transgender Thread.

[Daniel]

So why the hell are soo many people are coming out of the woodwork and calling themselves "experts" on sex and gender now?

Can you please provide an example?

Also this:

 

[Scaff]

I think this might've been discussed here before but there have been many cases throughout history of men and women having traits from the opposite gender. I know it may sound derogatory today but the "tomboy" was the best example of this. Girls having boyish traits were never really queried to the degree that they are now, and were more or less accepted by society. The most notable example in mainstream media would have to be Peppermint Patty from Peanuts. I watched several episodes of Peanuts when I was younger because it's what mum watched when she was a kid. Based on my understanding, Peppermint Patty was a beloved character that captured the hearts and minds of millions without being preachy. Everyone knew of her boyish traits but that was part of her as a character and no one gave a damn. There was another story that I read where a girl named Edwina was given the name "Eddie" due to her boyish traits. Sure, it was a little strange but I was able to understand why she was called "Eddie" for short.

That would be because of idiots like Matt Walsh, you know, the fascist you like.

So why the hell are soo many people are coming out of the woodwork and calling themselves "experts" on sex and gender now?

Tree'd perfectly by @Daniel

It's like how everyone becomes a horse racing expert during the Spring Racing Carnival when they don't know squat about horse racing. These so-called "experts" spread a lot of BS around and that's exactly whats gong on here.

Look in a mirror, the person here doing this is YOU!

Misinformation is nothing new but the rate at which it can spread and then be echoed by uncultured swine now is scary.

This is the real scourge of social media and we must stamp it out.

Then stop citing the nonsense from the likes of Walsh and co.

To quote Martin Niemoller...

"First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me"

...but you're doing far worse than 'not speak out', you're actively championing those who, given the chance, would do you harm. And you doing it simply because a group of people who have never done you harm, make you feel a bit 'icky' and confused.

 

[ScottPuss20]

That would be because of idiots like Matt Walsh, you know, the fascist you like.

I don’t like him

Look in a mirror, the person here doing this is YOU!

Not anymore

Then stop citing the nonsense from the likes of Walsh and co.

I have stopped

To quote Martin Niemoller...

"First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me"

...but you're doing far worse than 'not speak out', you're actively championing those who, given the chance, would do you harm. And you doing it simply because a group of people who have never done you harm, make you feel a bit 'icky' and confused.

I am not championing people who would harm me. Nor am I confused now.

 

[Scaff]

I don’t like him

Not anymore

I have stopped

I am not championing people who would harm me. Nor am I confused now.

Then you may want to make that a lot clearer when posting, particularly given your past posting history.