- 358
- CA
- Z-Crazy
That would be cool, but I fear the accountants wouldn't want something that pricey. Personally, if I had the helm, I'd look in to an insanely low power DD wheel. I'm sure the lawyers would have a say in the torque specs, but I think Logitech could redefine the market with a 3-5 Nm DD wheel. I say such low torque because this wheel is used by many young enthusiasts who are less able to take a wheel failure while its in hand (again... that's a dig at the lawyers). I think the wheel manufacturing cost could be a similar cost to the current wheel because of the simplicity and reduction in parts, but the software development costs along with motor development costs would cause a problem and would significantly raise the "actual" price. This is my pipe dream for them, but I fully expect them to stay close to the formula they have now.I think a new Logitech wheel that is similar in spec to the CSL Elite could do quite well. I really hope we start seeing load cell brakes come as standard on all pedals soon enough.
As far as the load cell brake, again I'd LOVE to see them become the mid-market standard as the cost to implement it isn't high, however I fear the way this segment of the market drives would make it a problem. The $200-$400 market is driven largely from desks and wheel stands. Even a low load load-cell, like a 15-30kg cell, would be pushed all over the dining room floor (yes, I'm exaggerating but not by much). Load cells effectively require you to hard mount your pedals to something, and nearly require some sort of rig, or at a minimum you need to rig some stability up. For this reason, I think they will continue to steer clear of the load cell. I hope I'm wrong, but that would be my stance if I were making the calls.
One other thing I've been thinking about, I don't think it would be a stretch to see them start a modular concept like Fanatec proved could be profitable, and Thrustmaster is now embracing. I think its a logical step for Logitech.
Last edited: