- 34,949
- Indian Falls, NY
- slashfan7964
It dynoed officially at 825hp and had to be dialed back to 700 to meet emissions requirements and it's BARELY able to do that.There's rumors that it's actually a lot more than that. Somewhere in the 800s.
It dynoed officially at 825hp and had to be dialed back to 700 to meet emissions requirements and it's BARELY able to do that.There's rumors that it's actually a lot more than that. Somewhere in the 800s.
Yeah where are my nominations!Also, If it picks me again in the next few days, I'm going to reroll. It makes sense, I currently have the most nominations by a pretty nice gap, but still, most of mine are classic muscle cars, and we need a little variety.
yes@Lister_Storm Did you read the OP?
Sorted.
:/ thanksYeah. I just realized, I need a section specifically for "How to nominate." I threw the OP together in five minutes. I get quite a few questions on how exactly it works anyway.
This car returns on 10/23/14.The 1974 introduction of the Mustang II earned Ford Motor Trend magazine's Car of the Year honors again and actually returned the car to more than a semblance of its 1964 predecessor in size, shape, and overall styling. Though Iacocca insisted that the Mustang II be finished to quality standards unheard of in the American auto industry, the Mustang II suffered from being not only smaller than the original car, but heavier as well due to the federal emission and safety regulations and its build quality could be described as only "mediocre" - no better than other Ford or Detroit products of the day. Available as a hardtop or three-door hatchback, the new car's base engine was a 2.3 L SOHC I4, the first fully metric engine built in the U.S. for installation in an American car. A 2.8 L V6 was the sole optional engine, meaning the popular V8 option would disappear for the first and only time in 1974, and Ford was swamped by buyer mail and criticized in the automotive press for it.
Since the car was never meant to have a V8, it became a mad scramble to reengineer the car in order to reinstate the 302 in³ (5.0 L) V8 option in time for the 1975 model year, but only in low-suds form with a two-barrel carburetor and 140 horsepower. Like the car that preceded it, the Mustang II had its roots in another compact, the Ford Pinto, though less so than the original car was based on the Falcon. The car sold well, with sales of more than 400,000 units its first year. It is also worth noting that four of the five years of the Mustang II are on the top-ten list of most-sold Mustangs. Despite innovations such as rack-and-pinion steering and a separate engine sub-frame that greatly decreased noise, vibration, and harshness, the Mustang II never caught the public's fancy like the original had ten years prior.
The Arab oil embargo, skyrocketing insurance rates, and aforementioned US emissions and safety standards that destroyed the straight-line performance of virtually every car of the period, certainly didn't help. Chrysler ended production of the Barracuda and its stable mate, the Dodge Challenger, in 1974. Then GM nearly discontinued the Camaro and Firebird that same year. However, on the momentum of the Mustang II's success, and under the direction of Ford's new styling chief, Jack Telnack, a totally new Mustang hit the streets for 1979.
I think the same thing honestly. I mean, I like Fox bodies, but I always thought these looked more like a Mustang. Plus, it had quite a snarl in it's face.Much better looking than Fox body.
Please no...Danny on Counting Cars flipped one of these last night. It was awesome.
No what? Danny is awesome at that stuff.I think the same thing honestly. I mean, I like Fox bodies, but I always thought these looked more like a Mustang. Plus, it had quite a snarl in it's face.
Please no...
Also, Adam from Top Gear has one.
You said he flipped it. Like wrecked. Unless you mean he fixed one up and sold it for a profit.No what? Danny is awesome at that stuff.
The second one. He bought it, tweaked the motor (he mentioned Edelbrock a lot), gave it a really nice custom paintjob (sort of like an orange color, with street freak style stripes, and custom pinstriping as well). It looked awesome.You said he flipped it. Like wrecked. Unless you mean he fixed one up and sold it for a profit.
He probably put an Edelbrock top end on it. $1,800 worth of parts is about a 230hp upgrade.The second one. He bought it, tweaked the motor (he mentioned Edelbrock a lot), gave it a really nice custom paintjob (sort of like an orange color, with street freak style stripes, and custom pinstriping as well). It looked awesome.
I know for a fact he put an edelbrock 4-barrel carb in there, I saw it. I wish I had a picture, but it happened just last night. None up yet...He probably put an Edelbrock top end on it. $1,800 worth of parts is about a 230hp upgrade.
I have never liked Fox body it just doesn't look like a Mustang at all and it's not very good car from factory.I think the same thing honestly. I mean, I like Fox bodies, but I always thought these looked more like a Mustang. Plus, it had quite a snarl in it's face.
I don't remember anyone in Top Gear being called Adam.Also, Adam from Top Gear has one.
Top Gear USA.I don't remember anyone in Top Gear being called Adam.
I know for a fact he put an edelbrock 4-barrel carb in there, I saw it. I wish I had a picture, but it happened just last night. None up yet...
That guy knows what he's doing when it comes to hot rods, street rods, muscle cars, or anything classic and American really.
I have never liked Fox body it just doesn't look like a Mustang at all and it's not very good car from factory.
I don't remember anyone in Top Gear being called Adam.
Top Gear USA.
I've never watched it.Top Gear USA.