- 27
- Michigan
- Quarterbreed1998
If people have questions about the beta, please let me know I will try to answer as many as I can in a timely fashion. I spent a large amount of time playing and streaming the game over the weekend.
We have a main beta thread over here: https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/thre...-march-17-first-the-us-then-eu-region.354301/If people have questions about the beta, please let me know I will try to answer as many as I can in a timely fashion. I spent a large amount of time playing and streaming the game over the weekend.
Thanks I'll head over to that thread.We have a main beta thread over here: https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/thre...-march-17-first-the-us-then-eu-region.354301/
It would probably be a better place for people to ask you questions and such.
From what I've played of the beta this weekend, I own a base ps4, the game holds 60fps very well even when dealing with 20 cars on the track at once, and the major screen tearing issues of previous games appears to have been resolved.
If people have questions about the beta, please let me know I will try to answer as many as I can in a timely fashion. I spent a large amount of time playing and streaming the game over the weekend.
I've not said you shouldn't buy it. I said "No reason to buy it" Not you shouldn't buy it. You can leave it at that.But still, you're telling me that I shouldn't buy it because of the slow AI. What if I'm in it more for the physics? I find it a bit pretentious that you're telling me to not buy the game just because the AI is slow.
Seems we look for different things in our racing games. I tend to look for physics more than AI, while it's vice versa for you. Can we leave it at that?
Its called feed back,If the only thing PD hears is loving and gushing nothing will ever change...
If you look at the threads you can see one for what you like and one for what you don't like , makes it easier to read throughVery little chance of that on this site If it's feedback you wished to give, then a non-partisan title such as 'Your Feedback about the GTS Beta' would have done a better job, surely?
I'm with Oddball on this.
This is one I chanced upon and seemed pretty sim-orientated, though he does cycle through the views a bit.Can anyone recommend links to beta footage that shows in-cockpit close, clean racing? The Beta Tester footage I have found so far seems to be more of an "arcade mentality' with lots of collisions and a lack of good racecraft. Nothing wrong with that, I'm just interested in seeing more what the immersion is like from a "drive it like you own it" perspective. 👍
Sorry, yours was first by quite a few hours. Like I said, feedback goes both ways and as yours was first, it set a precedent; so I remain with Oddball on this.If you look at the threads you can see one for what you like and one for what you don't like , makes it easier to read through
I'd like to see blind spot indicators come back. It's a huge reason why online races are so messy.
I noticed that too. Not only at Nurb, Brands too.The trees have been greatly downgraded. From gorgeous trees to the classic 2d sprites at the Nurb. The final release better have the 3d trees.
I agree with you. The atmosphere, outside of the Nurb, is "meh" at the best. Where are the flags, people in the pitlane, the chopper, TV cameras,the nice animations along the track, etc?-The atmosphere is still really dry. Can we get some atmosphere to the races??
Based only on videos:
1. Sounds still need work. (Better though they are, thank goodness)
2. Collision physics.
But we have hot-air balloons, in various colours at that!Where are the flags, people in the pitlane, the chopper, TV cameras,the nice animations along the track, etc?
Eh, this thread is fine. It gives people an area to discuss what they find to be negatives of the game and should help with direction. That way people can post here rather than getting people winded in the main discussion threads, as that is a likely scenario to happen.Sorry, yours was first by quite a few hours. Like I said, feedback goes both ways and as yours was first, it set a precedent; so I remain with Oddball on this.
I think you have perhaps missed the point Why start with a negative assumption, why not a general thread for impressions/comments on the beta? This is why @daan commented originally, I suspect.Eh, this thread is fine. It gives people an area to discuss what they find to be negatives of the game and should help with direction. That way people can post here rather than getting people winded in the main discussion threads, as that is a likely scenario to happen.
It'll act much similarly to the ill-named "whining and crying" thread.
Didn't miss your point, just didn't agree with it. The second part of your post covers why I think it's fine this way. When you get people talking negatively in the general discussion you tend to get more of an outbursts, essentially telling them to go away, no matter how aggressive or passive the person is being. It's almost like a safe haven so to speak lol.I think you have perhaps missed the point Why start with a negative assumption, why not a general thread for impressions/comments on the beta? This is why @daan commented originally, I suspect.
I do appreciate that some people don't like reading through a lot of posts, but unfortunately, making two threads won't make that easier, not really.
Whilst the two thread approach can create an echo-chamber false impression. Mostly I ignore outburst posts these days, it does make life simpler and calmer.Well, the second part of your post covers why I think it's fine this way. When you get people talking negatively in the general discussion you tend to get more of an outbursts, essentially telling them to go away, no matter how aggressive or passive the person is being. It's almost like a safe haven so to speak lol.