What is better the Nissan R92CP or the Toyota Minolta

  • Thread starter tho
  • 34 comments
  • 19,962 views

R92 vs. Minolta

  • Nissan R92CP

    Votes: 21 41.2%
  • Toyota MINOLTA

    Votes: 30 58.8%

  • Total voters
    51
  • Poll closed .
My oppinion is this, Minolta is the fastest Group C car but I like Sauber and R89CP more.
Still, voted for the Minolta, it's speed is just amazing. Broke 51 seconds with it on High Speed Ring. Handles great, has unbelievable torque and acceleration. Wicked car, too bad it wasn't a successful car. It had potential.
 
I think I must be the only one on here that doesnt tune race cars as I like to drive them true to their real life form...

Not the only one, I hate adding power to any of my race cars...seems kind of pointless to me. Personally I turn the power in those monsters down to about 630-690hp range, pretty much race power output. They handle much better and don't eat tires, well the Minolta eats them constantly.

I have the Minolta but have yet to come across the R92CP which is my favorite Group C car. Just love to hear that engine grunt in that thing, I wish that the Sauber C9 had a better engine sound, that thing wails like a banshee very annoying to hear tearing down le Sarthe so I tend not to drive that thing.

I will pick the Sauber for now as it's better than Minolta, but the Minolta has 6 gears and is slightly easier to control.
 
I thought again and I'm still at the conclusion that I proved you wrong. Just read every single one of my posts in this thread except for my conversation with Alonso till you post again. Don't argue if you aren't ready to read what's coming your way.
👍

To sum up what you've said:
"You can't find the 88C-V if you type "Toyota Minolta" on Google search or Wikipedia search."

I have proven you wrong since I found the car without typing the exact model number/name. Therefore your statement is invalid.
If you search just for "Minolta" then yes, camera manufacturer will appear, but if you add "Toyota" in front and you'll get the 88C-V.
Your statement is the same as if you said Red Bull F1 can't be called like that because Red Bull is a drink. Completly idiotic (not reffering to you).
Good day sir.
 
Last edited:
Back