What is the worst TV show you have ever seen?

National Icons

It's a sports magazine show that tries to take the biggest names in various sports to try and assess who was the best.

Why is it terrible?

It just tried to make out that Ken Block was a legitimate rival to Sebastién Loeb in rallying ...
 
I tought Whale Wars is from Animal Planet, not Discovery. :confused:
Does it even matter? Seems all channels are just churning out 🤬 reality shows to make a buck. Aliens, swamp people, truck drivers, loggers on History Channel (if you're lucky, maybe some history around D-Day)...no music on MTV, just utter teensy reality crap...Animal Planet rarely has animals anymore (Treehouse Masters...I mean, really??). Way too many mean and nasty people on these shows. Or blue collar folks just constantly cussing at each other. It's a sad state of affairs anymore on most channels. I actually get more enjoyment out of stuff like Nature on PBS.

/rant.
 
New Girl

Because Zooey Deschanel really needed a job, even though she's only capable of playing a Manic Pixie Dream Girl, or the least realistic archetype ever created. Its one saving grace is that it keeps her off every other show.

Way too many mean and nasty people on these shows. Or blue collar folks just constantly cussing at each other. It's a sad state of affairs anymore on most channels.
It's a culture that worships bad behaviour. If you're the meanest, nastiest and most wretched person imaginable, you're a success.

"30 Rock" nailed it with the episode "Queen of Jordan".
 
This...

Total_Divas_2014_logo.png


I wasted a season (10 weeks '1 episode per week') of my life watching it... I like wrestling, but I don't care wrestlers' "real life" outside, specially if the main characters are the divas :crazy::crazy::crazy:
 
This...

Total_Divas_2014_logo.png


I wasted a season (10 weeks '1 episode per week') of my life watching it... I like wrestling, but I don't care wrestlers' "real life" outside, specially if the main characters are the divas :crazy::crazy::crazy:
What made you think it was a show about wrestling in the first place? On normal WWE programming they promote the show as a Reality TV Program every hour.
 
Anyone seen Rush Hour - The Series. Gosh it is the most disappointing thing on earth. Could barely watch the first episode. It's obviously been created by someone who has never watched the films and caters to an audience who hasn't seen them either. Insulting to a great 90's classic.
 
Why on earth would anyone want to watch a programme about tools like that?
Because they're shallow and vapid and live in a culture that worships the instant gratification that comes with the theatre of the self, where it's easier to become a celebrity through exhibitionism than it is to become a success through genuine hard work.
 
Rich Kids Of Instagram is a thing? Anyone want to put a bullet between my eyes?

Don't know if you can see these trailers but yes, it's a real show over here:




Baffling why any sane person would want to watch an hour of that. The trailers are bad enough.
 
I'm pretty sure that it's a spin-off of "Rich Kids of Beverly Hills" ... which was created by someone who became a celebrity (and I use the term loosely) from posting stuff on Instagram.
 
All the CSI shows. I can tolerate NCIS because Ziva is absurdly sexy in both appearence and voice, and I like the dynamic between her and Tony. But all other crime thriller shows are abysmal.

Reality shows are also pure cancer.
 
I can tolerate NCIS because Ziva is absurdly sexy in both appearence and voice, and I like the dynamic between her and Tony.
Oh, you're going to be disappointed ...

But all other crime thriller shows are abysmal.
"Castle" was good. And there are occasionally good episodes of the likes of "Criminal Intent". I do like the original "Law & Order" because it tries to be realistic and there are actual consequences to the investigation.
 
Oh, you're going to be disappointed ...

"Castle" was good. And there are occasionally good episodes of the likes of "Criminal Intent". I do like the original "Law & Order" because it tries to be realistic and there are actual consequences to the investigation.


I think I know what you're referring to regarding NCIS. I don't actually watch the show so much as I ocasionally watch an episode if I happen upon it when I turn on the TV. In general, I barely watch any TV. As for Castle, yes, it was good. I wouldn't classify it as a thriller though, as it is more a buddy cop comedy show. Sadly, it also ran itself into the ground.
 
Last edited:
The recently deceased Paul Daniels was a slick professional entertainer and may he rest in peace but Wizbit was one of the worst programmes I've ever seen.



The Junior Christian Science Bible Lesson show I caught on the Screenwipe show once is probably up there with the worst though.

 
Last edited:
I think this is up there as one of the worst TV shows ever invented. I saw a trailer for something called Naked Attraction, basically it's a blind dating show but you see their naked private bits and you choose them based on that.... seriously what is wrong with this planet. :banghead:
 
Finally saw a bit of NAKED ATTRACTION last night just because every keeps talking about how horrifying the program is especially with the endless zoomed in nudity :lol: and my god they really pick the worst people (probably the only people who will go) to be on this show.

They are all in love with themselves and are all 'one night stand' in mindset. They should rename this show as pick who you want to bed tonight, it's literally a brothel setup! There was this shallow blonde girl picking men last night, sums up everything that's wrong with humanity :ouch:

Surely Channel 4 is going to be pressured by Ofcom to shut this down!
 
There are many good candidates mentioned already in this thread: Reality shows (esp. Kardashians), live-action shows (the last ones I liked was back when Amanda Bynes was a star) and modern Nickelodeon (even the disturbing modern Spongebob episodes). But for me I am labelling a few:
Naked Attraction as a recent (2016) candidate. as @Robin. pointed out, f:censored:ed up concept of a show. whoever thought of it as a concept has no idea or concept of dignity
FRED: The Show as an all time candidate. Anyone who remembers Fred will understand why this is here. Breadwinners comes a very close second, and Annoying Orange is up there too
As for a worst candidate in Australia, not a show but television presenter Tony Jones. Completely biased and unprofessional and gets away with fabricating claims to suit his socialist agenda.
That's about all I got for now...
 
Last edited:
As for a worst candidate in Australia, not a show but television presenter Tony Jones. Completely biased and unprofessional and gets away with fabricating claims to suit his socialist agenda.
That's the favourite argument of Liberal voters who think that the ABC should only ever run pro-government stories. Where were the complaints when they were critical of Rudd and Gillard governments?
 
I thought the Channel 4 Reality shows couldn't get worse. I was wrong. I saw an advert for 'Stage School' and the overacting/dramatization was so bad I thought it was a parody/satire show. It's actually real. They actually want us to believe real humans act like this.

Apologies for the Daily Fail link but I can't find it anywhere else online:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/fe...look-brand-new-trailer-E4-s-Stage-School.html

Suffice to say I won't be watching it.
 
That's the favourite argument of Liberal voters who think that the ABC should only ever run pro-government stories. Where were the complaints when they were critical of Rudd and Gillard governments?

Personally, i'm against the ideological leanings of the ABC, regardless of whatever side of the spectrum. It is a government-funded entity and as such should be apolitical. As a matter of fact, you have to take this pledge when you work in some government roles (i.e. working in an embassy), so why are the people of the ABC immune to this?

However, the reasoning behind my dislike towards Tony Jones is more personal due to his discriminatory stance towards me. I am an Australian of Croatian ancestry, and Croatians were once considered the terrorists of Australia culminating into one of the longest (and largely ignored) court cases in Australian history known as the Croatian Six.

Long story short, six Australians of Croatian decent were convicted on conspiracy to commit acts of terror in 1979, and spent a decade in prison. However, the only evidence police had were allegedly forced confessions and testimonals of the perpretrators acquiring explosive equipment, and furthermore there was evidence (even at the time of their arrests) that the Yugoslavian secret police (known as Udba) had framed these men in an attempt to sabotage and blacken the name of the Crotaian community in Australia.

All this leads back to why I dislike Tony Jones. He is (and was) a prime example of the Left who find it fit to lie and exaggerate claims in order to further their own agenda. Croatians were subject to the ridicule of being called 'Nazis' despite there being no evidence to the claim. Even worse, in a recent episode of Q & A, he tries to link Croatian 'terrorism' to modern Islamic terrorism:

Q&A host Tony Jones interjected Queensland senator Pauline Hanson when she suggested that Australia had never had terrorism.

"Pauline, when you say we never had terrorism in this country before that's simply not the case," Mr Jones said.

"In the 1970s there were multiple bombings by Croatian Catholic extremists. This has happened in Australia before; it is not the first time

Now do you know of any terrorist attack in Australia occurring during the 1970's?
No? Because it's not true. He's getting paid by a government-funded channel to lie to people on national television

If you're interested here is a good piece written by the Sydney Morning Herald that talks more about the ordeal.
Here is also a letter written by the Croatian Studies Foundation in reponse to Tony Jones
 
Last edited:
I have to agree, ABC needs to be more politically neutral.

Whilst I Love the format of Q & A and it tends to give the most intellectual discussions in Australian Politics/Religion etc, Tony Jones as an Opinionated Moderator is not a good idea(He usually brings Claims that the person he talks to has little knowledge of that doesn't know the true scenario which in many times is false or Misleading), he would be more suitable being one of the Panel that gives a response.

I do think the show cops a lot of slack because the audience is profoundly left and is intimating for those that come against it, which is unfortunate.

I also wish people like Hanson and the likes to be intellectual enough to back up her points(which some of she could and many are just hidden bigotry because they are different).

Unfortunately the people in politics that have differing opinions to that of the Moderater in Australia are either not well versed or just plain unintelligent(Hanson a clear example).

Sam Harris I hope gets on the show at some point to talk about religion.
 
I have to agree, ABC needs to be more politically neutral.

Whilst I Love the format of Q & A and it tends to give the most intellectual discussions in Australian Politics/Religion etc, Tony Jones as an Opinionated Moderator is not a good idea(He usually brings Claims that the person he talks to has little knowledge of that doesn't know the true scenario which in many times is false or Misleading), he would be more suitable being one of the Panel that gives a response.

Like I said before about the Croatian Six, but i'd rather not see him offer an opinion due to his track record of fabricating history

I do think the show cops a lot of slack because the audience is profoundly left and is intimating for those that come against it, which is unfortunate.

Agreed. Leads to the conclusion that the ABC is biased, when it should be apolitical.

I also wish people like Hanson and the likes to be intellectual enough to back up her points(which some of she could and many are just hidden bigotry because they are different).

Unfortunately the people in politics that have differing opinions to that of the Moderater in Australia are either not well versed or just plain unintelligent(Hanson a clear example).

Generally a large problem with alternate (especially 'right') views. But even if they did manage to substantiate their claims do you think they would be seen or treated differently?

Sam Harris I hope gets on the show at some point to talk about religion.
I hope they never talk about religion again, especially the stunt they pulled off a few years back (on an Easter Monday) by inviting Richard Dawkins on the show with Archbishop (at the time) George Pell to talk about religion
 
Back