Let me introduce you to the wonderful world of Live Service/Games as a Service! Where your full priced game is not finished at release and finally complete in 3-4 years time when you can buy it for $7.99 in the used games bin at Walmart.The game should never have come to sale in its current state.
Not an unpopular opinion ;pMine is the roulette tickets, they suck, in the last 10+ days I’ve had 2 4 star tickets and the rest 1 and 2 star and 1 of the 4 star tickets I got 5000 Cr, and as you can only obtain an engine swap through 4 star tickets it looks like I may never see an engine swap! They need to make it possible to earn more tickets through driving more or daily challenges at least.
You can also get engine swaps in 5 and 6 star tickets. Though I don't think they appear as an option as regularly as they do with the 4 star. The only engine swap I got was out of the 6 star ticket you get for finishing Cafe, the 13B RX-7 engine, so idk... They're so damned hard to get that I haven't even tried it yet. Only car I can find that it can be swapped into is the '89 Eunos Roadster which is probably a beast, but I'm not wasting the engine until I have a spare or until I am 100% sure there are no other cars that can receive it.Mine is the roulette tickets, they suck, in the last 10+ days I’ve had 2 4 star tickets and the rest 1 and 2 star and 1 of the 4 star tickets I got 5000 Cr, and as you can only obtain an engine swap through 4 star tickets it looks like I may never see an engine swap! They need to make it possible to earn more tickets through driving more or daily challenges at least.
Anybody with a bit of a brain should know being cross-gen is good because huge lack of PS5 means if GT7 had been released only for PS5 it would've had very few players and very few sales.Mine is I think that GT7 being a cross-gen title, being on both PS4 and PS5 is a good thing.
As it turns out the PS5 active playerbase suffered in many games due to scalpers, so you're not entirely wrong there.Anybody with a bit of a brain should know being cross-gen is good because huge lack of PS5 means if GT7 had been released only for PS5 it would've had very few players and very few sales.
Anyway, my unpopular opinion is... The rewards have not been that bad so far... They haven't given much money, but a lot of cars very quickly. I have almost 100, in just 3 weeks.
Many people hated it being cross-gen because it was trendy to do so but in general most had no idea about the subjectAs it turns out the PS5 active playerbase suffered in many games due to scalpers, so you're not entirely wrong there.
The reason, IIRC that people hated GT7 being a cross-gen title was that the graphics and physics would be hindered due to needing to be fully compatible with old gen hardware constraints. Don't know the truth to that since it was rumored GT7 was already being made for PS4 when and even before Sport was still getting heavy updates
You think the Spanish guy named "Luca" is a white guy? Ok then...oh also I gotta add, because I havent seen any reviewer or any bro on the site say it....but Luca and the whole cafe thing is just so insufferably pretentious and stuffy it almost ruins the experience for me
you got a hidden cafe in the woods where a middle aged white guy gives u a leather bound menu book to go get some cars and after you do that another middle aged white guy gives you a tldr about your car. Absolutely corny
he was spanish? i didnt look that hard at his picture. my bad bro!You think the Spanish guy named "Luca" is a white guy? Ok then...
My unpopular take is that I see a lot of complaints centering around car collecting and all these super/hyper/legend car prices, which spurns people into talking about the economy, and how it being "realistic" is harmful to us.... meanwhile these same people are playing through missions and menus that are CHUCKING cars at you left and right which, I think, is much more "unrealistic" but also never seems to be taken into account when people lament the economy. I have a garage packed with cars, most of which I've never driven, so I don't really concern myself with the one that will take longer to get, or I may never have at all. I also have multiple car styles and choices depending on the race without hardly spending any in game currency on them, which I have a lot of fun with.
Out of interest, why do you consider any of this to be an 'unpopular' opinion? Which is what the thread is asking for.TL;DR How do you make a grand-scope racing game so infuriatingly inconvenient to use?
It's a 7/10 game at best - pun sorta unintended. Its core gameplay is fantastic, it's probably my favorite in the series. It's its other aspect - the menus - that I find absolutely dreadful in experiencing, it's just annoying. Quality of life is nowhere to be found when it comes to menu navigation.
It's not possible to switch between GT Auto menus, you can only return to the map. I'd understand this if GT Auto was three separate icons on the map but it isn't - it makes no sense.
Why can't we buy upgrades from the car settings menu?
When you view a style for a car in GT Auto but want to search for another one, you should just come back to the style browser instead of the customization menu.
The top bar with the car , credits etc. is nearly useless.
The way menu music behaves is awful, I mean, the soundtrack itself is great but almost every switch between menu layers results in a change of what's currently playing and it turns music into gibberish. Enter garage, new track. GT Auto, new track. Go back to the map, new track. Come on.
The are dozens of small stumbles like these and it's just baffling. It almost feels like PoDi don't reasearch UX during menu design phase. Sure, the menus are super nice to look at, absolutely, but good lord they are inconvenient to use.