What movies have you seen lately? Now with reviews!Movies 

  • Thread starter scentedsoap
  • 8,208 comments
  • 484,457 views
Matrix Reloaded - This is actually going to be more of a series review. So, after watching Reloaded I started to ask myself "What's wrong with the Matrix, exactly?" Because, while it feels terrible, it's actually well done. And I think I've figured it out. The whole idea of the Matrix is that it's a computer program. So, to make you believe you're viewing a world inside a computer program everything is very...mechanic. From the constant grid world to the fight scenes, everything feels calculated. And that is actually the downfall of the series. Because those computer generated fight scenes...are boring. They FEEL choreographed. They don't feel natural and smooth. It feels like a hacker (Neo) is fighting a computer program...which that's the idea. But it still feels slow and boring.

And then...when they're not in the Matrix...is just a bunch of exposition or whispered conversation or a random rave party and sex scene with the two people in the world you'd rather not see having sex.

Plus the actors they got, aren't that good. I mean, Hugo Weaving and the other agents are the best parts of the movies because they make you believe they're what they are: programs designed to STOP these hackers from disrupting the program. I mean, when Agent Smith has Morpheus head in his hand and is delivering his speech, it's a very well delivered speech and you believe that he's a very frustrated program that's tired of dealing with the hackers.

But, in the end, the dullness of the rest of the actors and exposition and painfully choreographed fight scenes almost drowns out Hugo's superior acting abilities. And if you don't think Hugo was the better actor, who had the most acting roles AFTER the Matrix? Keanu appeared in The Day the Earth Stood Still and Fishbourne did a season of CSI while Hugo did V for Vandetta and the Lord of the Rings Trilogy AND the Hobbit movies. So while, the Matrix made a star out of Hugo, Hollywood barely even noticed everyone else.

As for a rating on Reloaded: it's dull fighting scenes gives it a 2/5 and the series as a whole gives 2/5.
 
Iron Man 3 - I really enjoyed this, felt the nerd over-reaction was unjustified. Great little twist. 9.4/10
 
Jadoo


This is a film shot in my home city which was what first made me want to go and see it. The storyline of a divided Indian family trying to be reunited fits into Leicester very well with the Indian culture in Leicester (we have the largest Diwali festival in the world outside India). A throughly enjoyable film start to finish with some very good character development.
 
Iron Man 3 - I really enjoyed this, felt the nerd over-reaction was unjustified. Great little twist. 9.4/10

The over reaction was the *Spoiler Alert*





The mandarin twist, no 10 rings and the history change on the extremis story line and combining the bleeding edge suit at the end.
 
Matrix Reloaded

I could go on for hours about what's wrong with "Reloaded"... it's cropped up on local HBO, and I've given it a watch. Some of he fight scenes are still breath-taking... well... the first three or four minutes of each fight scene... then they get dull and boring. Like a techno track with a single loop that goes on for way too long.

The dialogue from "Reloaded" felt like a whole lot of impressive sounding pseudo-philosophical navel-gazing exposition got poured into a typewriter (because that is obviously the hipster thing to do) and came out as a finished movie script at the end.

In writing, they tell us that effectie writing means condensing as many thoughts as possible into as few words as possible. The Matrix Reloaded does the opposite.

It could be worse. It could be Peter Jackson trying to direct a movie that's not four hours long...
 
The Matrix is like Ghost in the Shell if it had been directed by M. Night Shammalan. (See Last Airbender. Lots of pointless exposition, non-expressive characters and boring fight scenes.)

GITS, the movies, do have a lot of explanation, but, it kinda needs it. With the movies, too, they don't dwell forever on explanation and the characters are pretty expressive. Even Motoko who was designed to behave like a doll has enough expressions in her to make her interesting. And with the series...it's a series. Yeah, it has full episodes that are nothing but explanation, yet they do it ways that are interesting, and those episodes are needed.

The Matrix TRIED to capture the feel of GITS...but...failed miserably. Like I said, it's like M Night's version of Last Airbender. Although, that feels like there was more of an effort. Matrix used GITS has a reference and went off on a completely different tangent.

The crazy part is, GITS SAC borrowed a couple scenes from the Matrix and made them more entertaining.
 
I watched these on the plane (which had a pretty putrid selection):

Stark Trek: Into Darkness

Star-Trek-Into-Darkness-poster-landscape.jpg


One I was looking for and it completely failed to deliver. The story is essentially the introduction of how the Federation first meets Kahn and how the animosity begins.

The story was tragically dull and predictable, with a thorough soaking of cliches (Simon Pegg being the main culprit). The ending was rushed, the elapsing of time in the story scarcely believable and all in all it was just disappointing all-round. The one saving grace was Cumberbach who is awesome as Kahn. 3/10

The Place Beyond the Pines

places_beyond_pines-7.jpg


Another film I had been eagerly anticipating and pleasantly, delivered mostly on the expectations.

The story is essentially about two new father's on opposite sides of the law, one a cop and one a drifter. Their paths cross during an event (not wanting to spoil) and the movie then shows how the this event casts a shadow over the their futures and their families too.

The casting of Gosling and Cooper was pretty spot on and although I don't care for Mendes, she played her role well too.

A very gripping story and one that almost leaves one pondering how one's own action might spill into the future in some unexpected way. 8/10

Brief mention:

Fast n Furious 6

I stopped watching after it became apparent that a Camaro was being portrayed to keep up with a GT-R on a twisty mountain road, which was after the first 3 mins....0/10.
 
Last edited:
Rush_Poster.jpg


BOOM! 10/10

Watched an advanced screening of this film here in NZ on a Sunday evening and I'm glad I did.

I've also seen quite a large number of movies as of late but the most memorable of them are Mr. Bean's Holiday for some laughs and Elysium being the other mainstream blockbuster hit. In any case go see Rush! This is my movie of the year.
 
Rush

This is more than just the story of the 1976 Formula One season - this is the story of two men driven by desire for one thing - a World Championship title.

Daniel Bruehl is the reigning 1975 F1 World Champion, the calculating Austrian mastermind, Niki Lauda. His challenger is the British playboy, James Hunt. The duo are poles apart in demeanour and attitude. Lauda is the guy who'd stay all day at the race track finding those tenths of a second, finding some way for Ferrari to improve their car. Hunt, on the other hand, is the guy who'd stay all day in the bedroom in the company of beautiful women.

Like I said, this is more than just the 1976 season - the film is centred around Hunt and Lauda's rivalry, from its beginnings in Formula 3 and throughout the early 70s.

Personally, I believe it's Bruehl as Lauda who steals the show, and the rest of the cast is excellent too. You don't come away from this cheering one on and booing the other - you come away from this respecting both of these men, who did the best they could to achieve glory.

There are one or two faults with Hunt's scenes with his wife, but that won't stop me from giving this 9.5/10.






I wonder which season will be next to get the Hollywood treatment?
 
bxX2dJW.jpg


Key Largo (John Huston, 1948) -- A man visits his old friend's hotel and finds a gangster running things. As a hurricane approaches, the two end up confronting each other. Another one of the Bogart/Bacall classics, but also including Edward G. Robinson in an amazing role. Working almost like a play, this non-violent tale of mystery and deceit has a few issues that make you wonder how it fared so well, yet the overall value all the way to the end makes it great. The movie entices attention all the way from the start, with enough substance, well-thought scripts and very good storytelling that wasn't only there to support the Bogart/Bacall duo, but who work well even without them. A good, intelligent movie that is a good watch, even if you're not a hardcore Bogart fan. 8/10

xi8YTIG.jpg


10 (Blake Edwards, 1979) -- A Hollywood songwriter goes through a mid-life crisis and becomes infatuated with a sexy blond newlywed. I remember watching parts of this movie when I was a kid and, being quite sophomoric, it had a bunch of scenes that really had my "interest", to which I quickly fast-forwarded to, but having seen it this time, and not only those parts really make me realize what a piece of crap this was. The movie is called 10, because Bo Derek, the amazing bombshell of the time, is an actual 10. Yet, the moment when she finally has her first line is about 90 minutes in! Until then, the movie has been nothing but mishaps and stupid moments that didn't really work, but which were more like filler material.

Although the movie stars big names like Dudley Moore and Julie Andrews, they really don't get to shine because they're too busy acting dumb and irrationally, and Andrews' character isn't memorable at all; she just plays Moore's 'girlfriend'. As so many people in the 80s, I thought this movie was enjoyable (for whichever reasons), but now it's sad, slow and painful to watch at times, obviously not withstanding the passage of time. 3/10

mD3m18i.jpg


Moby Dick (John Huston, 1956) -- The sole survivor of a lost whaling ship relates the tale of his captain's self-destructive obsession to hunt the white whale, Moby Dick. As it often happens with movies taking place almost entirely on the same spot, this movie probably wasn't that easy to make, yet Huston was probably one of the best choices to do it, and along with Ray Bradbury's screenplay and the great acting by Gregory Peck, it's no wonder it came out so well indeed. Orson Welles' appearance is also a treat to watch, showing he can be great in a movie, no matter how small his role. The special effects really had me cringing a bit, but I guess depicting a great white whale shouldn't have been easy. In other matters, the fact that the movie goes into the relationship between man and God is sure to have prejudiced some audiences, but it's a great representation of an excellent book that, as far as I think, was better than the book. 7/10

DnW09uK.jpg


Synecdoche, New York (Charlie Kaufman, 2008) -- A theatre director struggles with his work, and the women in his life, as he creates a life-size replica of New York City inside a warehouse as part of his new play. I could be quick about it and just say this movie is depressing, but in reality, although it is, it's also one of the most deeply affecting movies I've seen in a long time; it's depressing indeed, but it's much, much deeper as well, because the movie is a brain teaser. It's not necessarily enjoyable, although 30 minutes into it I was sure I was going to watch it again soon (which I did the following day), because it's full of all the uncomfortable truths about being human, and goes places most movies don't dare to, challenging the audience and picking scabs that most people would rather leave alone.

I could go on saying what this movie meant for me and how it affected me, but the truth is that it wouldn't matter at all because it will probably mean something different for anyone else. It's about this director who is given the opportunity to make an incredibly ambitious theatrical work, and he uses his own life to make it, but to the point that he's recreating current situations on the stage, as they happen in real life. The plot is as confusing as that may sound and many times I found myself not knowing if I was watching the stage version or the real one, or a new fusion of them.

Although it may sound like mental, pretentious and intellectual masturbation, the movie challenges you but lets you follow it, letting you bring the meaning to it, rather than forcing you to accept the conclusion, and not necessarily dwelling into a deeper meaning of it, nor any higher power who is going to make sure that it all makes sense. Depressing and nihilistic as it may sound, the movie is also affirming, suggesting we spend too much time trying to make sense of life and not enough time living it.

This is not a movie for everyone, and it's the type of movie you have to work hard to understand it fully, and if you don't want to, you might end up hating it. But if you're willing to go through with it with an open mind, you´ll probable be amazed. 8.5/10


sXozLo7.jpg



Iron Man (Jon Favreau, 2008) -- When wealthy industrialist Tony Stark is forced to build an armored suit after a life-threatening incident, he ultimately decides to use its technology to fight against evil. As an avid comic book fan, though not necessarily of Iron Man, I was curious enough to see what would come of this one, and the fact is that due to time constraints, boredom and opportunity (or lack thereof), I actually saw Part 2 before this one. But still, the surprise factor wasn't gone, especially when you know what the movie is about, but I wanted to see the creation of Iron Man as a character. Needless to say, it's a fact that when this movie came out Downey Jr. wasn't Hollywood's biggest name, yet he has become one of them thanks to the success here, and I was in fact impressed enough at how well he portrayed it. The movie also has some great humor and it's well-written. The CGI (main reason to watch it, frankly) is quite impressive and breath-taking, though not distracting enough to make you miss the finer points of the movie. The movie is not perfect, but it does live up to the hype and expectations I had as a comic reader and a comic-movie fan, and it's actually good enough to justify a sequel. 7.5/10


uZgVijQ.jpg


Rollerball (Norman Jewison, 1975) -- In a corporate-controlled future, an ultra-violent sport known as Rollerball represents the world, and one of its powerful athletes is out to defy those who want him out of the game. This movie portrays a dark and disturbing look at a future that doesn't really seem that far off, showing a cold, sterile society where humanity is completely absent and where corporations rule the world. The rollerball scenes get more and more violent as the film progresses and also quite disturbing. The citizens in this dystopic future also lack feelings and humanity, and as it came out a bit after the Vietnam war ended, it really ties in with the overall sense of cynicism which so strongly existed in society. The thugs have taken over the smart, and violence rules the world. The movie is also very dated and, aside from the actual violent moments, it gets very boring and seems like an over and over scenery. Enjoyable, if it had only lasted 40 minutes less, yet it really hasn't stood the passage of time. Still amazing to see the BMW and Audi buildings as part of the view of what the future would be like. 5.5/10
 
Last edited:
Synecdoche, New York (Charlie Kaufman, 2008)

I watched this on a plane years ago and from what I recall it left me thinking it was a tragically honest allegory of life (e.g. do we live in a world imitating itself), depressing mostly, but equally thought-provoking. A great performance from Seymour Hoffman I recall.

I think it's time for a rewatch soon 👍
 
Waking Life (Linklater, 2001)

Waking-Life-Poster.jpg


I'm not sure how to really describe this film, but will give it a go as such:

The story is of an unnamed person, who lives in an existence that one is not quite sure is ethereal/ a dream, or waking reality. The movie is rotoscoped to emphasis the surreal nature of his existence, and this visual effect immensely emphasises the dream like quality of the story.

Through each mini-story of his current life, he first observes conversations of random people, friends and scholars on subjects of free will, existentialism and luxid dreaming. Gradually he starts understanding he may be dreaming and starts interacting in his dream with his dream characters. I wont go any further as it may spoil it, but it is a very thought provoking concept that delves into rich topics of whether life is punctuated by dreams or dream are punctuated by life. 8/10
 
@Mike Rotch - first time seeing Waking Life? Classic, one of the movies that makes Linklater great. Well, that and Dazed and Confused, Before Sunrise, School of Rock, a Scanner Darkly, Fast Food Nation, and the fact that he refuses to leave Austin to make movies (so no Hollywood.)
 
@Mike Rotch - first time seeing Waking Life?

I'll be watching it again :). I'm a big fan or Before Sunrise/ Sunset, although haven't seen Before Midnight yet.

I did watch A Scanner Darkly a long time ago which was my first rotoscope experience, but having just finished the book recently, I will want to watch it again 👍
 
Riddick (2013)

I was a huge fan of Pitch Black and Chronicles of Riddick. With that said, this movie was TERRIBLE. Almost an entire cast of no name actors and a lot of terrible acting. I don't recommend ever seeing this movie at all. 👎
 
Last edited:
I enjoyed the action of Riddick. I am pretty sure I have not seen Pitch Black and it has been so long since I have seen Chronicles that I was completely do not remember the story of the movie. So I was pretty much lost the entire time during Riddick. I am not really sure it tied into the other two movies at all.
 
Riddick (2013)

I was a huge fan of Pitch Black and Chronicles of Riddick. With that said, this movie was TERRIBLE. Almost an entire cast of no name actors and a lot of terrible acting. I don't recommend ever seeing this movie at all. 👎
The first 20-30 minutes were awesome. It was pure Riddick at his best. There is something incredible about an entire act of a film where almost no dialogue occurs but you know exactly what the story is telling you.

I enjoyed the action of Riddick. I am pretty sure I have not seen Pitch Black and it has been so long since I have seen Chronicles that I was completely do not remember the story of the movie. So I was pretty much lost the entire time during Riddick. I am not really sure it tied into the other two movies at all.
The old guy was the father of the bounty hunter from Pitch Black. The Karl Urban flashbacks connected the end of Chronicles to Riddick.


The ultimate failure of Riddick, and the biggest shortcoming of Chronicles, is that Vin Diesel wants Riddick to be a good guy. They have gone out of their way to make him the lone survivor of genocide justified in his actions. Pitch Black was awesome because you liked him the way you like Billy the Kid, Bonnie & Clyde, or Al Capone. They are clearly bad people with ultimately bad motives, but they are just so cool you want to see them keep going. It's the same reason some Transformers fans like Megatron or some other Decepticon. Riddick in Pitch Black was just portrayed as a psycho who was just cool. A far future Hannibal Lecter.

Now, you almost expect him to have a good cry between killings. He had a growth moment in Pitch Black. That was all we needed. But no, he has to be like Batman.
 
Waking Life (Linklater, 2001)

8/10

@Mike Rotch - first time seeing Waking Life? Classic, one of the movies that makes Linklater great. Well, that and Dazed and Confused, Before Sunrise, School of Rock, a Scanner Darkly, Fast Food Nation, and the fact that he refuses to leave Austin to make movies (so no Hollywood.)

I'll be watching it again :). I'm a big fan or Before Sunrise/ Sunset, although haven't seen Before Midnight yet.

I honestly didn't like Waking Life. 30 minutes into it and I still didn't know what it was about, just people talking about existentialism, which made it sound like more of a documentary to me. I've liked the Before series as well as A Scanner Darkly, but none of the others mentioned have really been my cup of tea. Scanner I did watch twice.

In other news, my computer blew up (power surge + no voltage protection) and I've been relying on my back-up hard discs, which although had most of my movies, the 'next ones to watch' are still in the 'maybe you can get them back' stage. Last night I saw:

TAt0QVU.jpg


21 Jump Street (Phil Lord, Chris Miller, 2012) -- The perfect movie for a Sunday night, about a pair of underachieving cops are sent back to a local high school to blend in and bring down a synthetic drug ring. Car chases, funny moments and a smartly written screenplay, along with a really great cameo that had me wondering just 'why?' and later found out. I was expecting this to be the same stupid movie as The Hangover Part II or The Change-Up, but it was actually something very different; pretty much the movie's greatest value is both Jonah Hill's dialogues, and his chemistry with Channing Tatum, both of which had me rooting for the characters and looking forward to each new scene. Good work, as long as you're not expecting too much. 7/10
 
Last edited:
I honestly didn't like Waking Life. 30 minutes into it and I still didn't know what it was about, just people talking about existentialism, which made it sound like more of a documentary to me. I've liked the Before series as well as A Scanner Darkly, but none of the others mentioned have really been my cup of tea. Scanner I did watch twice.

I must admit to almost turning off around the 40 mins mark, but at about the hour mark a few "a-ha" moments started arising and then it all came together. Not a fan of the ending, mind you.
 
The World's End 9.5/10

Because the music choice was superb, the movie itself was well paced and the jokes were cleverly placed. Also the references to their previous films were perfectly nestled in the movie. And the fact that I'm a massive fan of Nick Frost/Simon Pegg.
 
The first 20-30 minutes were awesome. It was pure Riddick at his best. There is something incredible about an entire act of a film where almost no dialogue occurs but you know exactly what the story is telling you.
I agree. The first 20-30 minutes were the ONLY enjoyable part of the movie. Basically when he was by himself trying to survive the brutal planet and training the dog like creature. THAT is the Riddick I have always enjoyed from Pitch Black and Chronicles of Riddick. Once the mercs started landing on the planet it just got TERRIBLE and I mean VERY TERRIBLE. One of the worst movies I have seen in years. Which is so painful for me to say considering as much as I like Pitch Black and Chronicles Of Riddick. I bet I have watched Chronicles at least 15 times. Chronicles of Riddick is actually one of my favorite movies.
 
Just watched The Sting (1973), my brother recommended it to me whilst i was watching Oceans Eleven. Really liked it, never really watched a movie with Paul Newman starring in it other than Road to perdition. I going to buy the blu-ray version now :)
 
21 Jump Street

Saw it too (21 Jump Street), 8/10, good movie I found it enjoyable to watch and the little jokes here and there were very fulfilling. Though in general the movie was forgettable. I was going to give this movie 7/10 but Ice Cube and Korean Jesus made me change my mind.

I also saw Sex Drive I'll give it 6.5/10 I didn't like the actors and the movie just seemed to drag itself on, but again, there were a few alright jokes.
 
Due to somebody's recent mention, finally just saw Chronicles of Riddick (poster reminded me of how I feel about Conan the Barbarian, so thought I'd give it a try.) Must say I was pleasantly surprised! Pretty good all around action/adventure movie, but biggest surprise was that it was clearly Fantasy vs Science Fiction. Don't get too many fantasy movies, especially not with a futuristic, intergalactic type setting. Overall solid 7.5/10, and 9/10 for the geek in me that knows the difference between sci-fi and fantasy. (for those of you who don't know but are interested, sci-fi makes everything pseudo-scientific, possibly explainable, someday, without refuting everything currently understood about science. Fantasy throws that out the window, and says let's have magic, let's break understanding and leave things unexplained. In other words, sci-fi is a possible extension of the world we know now, fantasy is some other world.)
 
Saw it too (21 Jump Street), 8/10, good movie I found it enjoyable to watch and the little jokes here and there were very fulfilling. Though in general the movie was forgettable. I was going to give this movie 7/10 but Ice Cube and Korean Jesus made me change my mind.

Korean Jesus ain't got time for your problems. He busy with Korean (stuff).
 
Watched 3 movies this weekend.

1. Star Trek Into Darkness - 3D
Great movie. I like the first one better but this was still really good. Most of the movie was quite predictable.

2. World War Z - 3D
This was surprisingly an EXCELLENT zombie movie!! It was like a perfect mix between Resident Evil 1 and Dawn of the Dead 2004. Excellent movie with a nice little twist at the end.

3. G.I. Joe: Retaliation
This was okay. Not that great at all. First one was a lot better.



Due to somebody's recent mention, finally just saw Chronicles of Riddick (poster reminded me of how I feel about Conan the Barbarian, so thought I'd give it a try.) Must say I was pleasantly surprised! Pretty good all around action/adventure movie, but biggest surprise was that it was clearly Fantasy vs Science Fiction. Don't get too many fantasy movies, especially not with a futuristic, intergalactic type setting. Overall solid 7.5/10, and 9/10 for the geek in me that knows the difference between sci-fi and fantasy. (for those of you who don't know but are interested, sci-fi makes everything pseudo-scientific, possibly explainable, someday, without refuting everything currently understood about science. Fantasy throws that out the window, and says let's have magic, let's break understanding and leave things unexplained. In other words, sci-fi is a possible extension of the world we know now, fantasy is some other world.)

Yes I truly love "The Chronicles of Riddick [2004]" and suggested it to everyone. Glad you enjoyed it. 👍 You should also check out "Pitch Black". Its the prequel to Chronicles of Riddick.

I don't recommend "Riddick [2013]"
 
Last edited:
Back