What movies have you seen lately? Now with reviews!Movies 

  • Thread starter scentedsoap
  • 8,208 comments
  • 484,251 views
Personally, the same thing happened with The Dark Knight than with the original Batman (1989)... everyone told me it was the best thing since sliced bread, and it all created such a level of expectation that by the time I saw the movie, I was expecting something it could never be.

In the end it wasa good movie, but not the best by far.
 
On Saturday I watched Slumdog Millionaire. While a good movie, it is nothing spectacular. A good majority of the flashbacks portraying parts of Indian life I already knew about and was not as surprised as someone who may not have known such things about India. With that said, the movie is well put together and the flashbacks do a very nice job explaining how Jamal knew the answer to each of the questions. I was not overwhelmed by the movie and at the same time, I was not disappointed. I enjoyed watching the movie, but I would not go out of my way to watch the movie again.
 
Also I recently watched James Clavell's Shogun, not sure if any here know about it. It was actually a mini series in 1980 about a English/Dutch ship that landed in the 'Japans' in 1598 (loosely based on a true story). I have it all linked together so it is like a 8.5hour movie, very interesting drama and very educational on Japanese langauge and customs.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0080274/

HIGHLY recommended

loosely based is correct. ;) The best part about the Shogun mini-series is that it stars Toshiro Mifune. But the mini-series is quite bad compared to the book.

Hey Diego,

That Miike Takeshi flim, like a dragon, is it Korean? The movie poster you posted has Korean characters on it. Perhaps it's a joint venture with a korean company. Not the first time that sort of thing has happened with a Japanese director. (Kurosawa for Dersu Uzula)
 
loosely based is correct. ;) The best part about the Shogun mini-series is that it stars Toshiro Mifune. But the mini-series is quite bad compared to the book.

Speaking of Toshiro Mifune I am partway through watching Red Sun right now :D
 
Hey Diego,

That Miike Takeshi flim, like a dragon, is it Korean? The movie poster you posted has Korean characters on it. Perhaps it's a joint venture with a korean company. Not the first time that sort of thing has happened with a Japanese director. (Kurosawa for Dersu Uzula)

I wouldn't think so... I just google image the name of the film and link the first poster that looks nice. According to IMDB the movie is purely Japanese, though there are a couple of Korean characters and they speak Korean between them.
 
20jjxo9.jpg
 


Ong-Bak (2003) -- Alright, so this is a fighting movie, much like Bloodsport or Rumble in the Bronx, with a bunch of amazing choreographies and little in the way of acting or anything else. When the head of a statue sacred to a village is stolen, a young martial artist goes to the big city and finds himself taking on the underworld to retrieve it. The storyline is predictable, but the visual and the fights makes up for it. There's the amazing flexibility and fighting sequences as well as outstanding acrobatic movements when running from the bad guys in the street and it was good to see the shots from different angles. Another good point of the movie is that the sequences are real... no wires, no CGI, (I think) no doubles. If you like martial arts films, then you'll sure to like this. 7/10
 
On Saturday I watched Slumdog Millionaire. While a good movie, it is nothing spectacular. A good majority of the flashbacks portraying parts of Indian life I already knew about and was not as surprised as someone who may not have known such things about India. With that said, the movie is well put together and the flashbacks do a very nice job explaining how Jamal knew the answer to each of the questions. I was not overwhelmed by the movie and at the same time, I was not disappointed. I enjoyed watching the movie, but I would not go out of my way to watch the movie again.
I thought the same thing. I can understand why it won all those Oscars for cinematography, music and directing but I didn't really find the story was anything amazing. Yeah it was interesting to see how Jamals unique experiences led him to know all the answers but like you said, it was nothing spectacular.
 


Ong-Bak (2003) -- Alright, so this is a fighting movie, much like Bloodsport or Rumble in the Bronx, with a bunch of amazing choreographies and little in the way of acting or anything else. When the head of a statue sacred to a village is stolen, a young martial artist goes to the big city and finds himself taking on the underworld to retrieve it. The storyline is predictable, but the visual and the fights makes up for it. There's the amazing flexibility and fighting sequences as well as outstanding acrobatic movements when running from the bad guys in the street and it was good to see the shots from different angles. Another good point of the movie is that the sequences are real... no wires, no CGI, (I think) no doubles. If you like martial arts films, then you'll sure to like this. 7/10

Sounds like I need to see this. I have seen the ending to Bloodsport about 865,493 times and seemingly for whatever reason enjoy it each time. How lame of me I know! :lol:
 
Sounds like I need to see this. I have seen the ending to Bloodsport about 865,493 times and seemingly for whatever reason enjoy it each time. How lame of me I know! :lol:

While I can't say Bloodsport was a good movie, I watched it a lot when I was a kid and enjoyed it very much. I recently saw it again and thought it was crap.



Rabid (1977) -- A classic Cronenberg film and pretty much one of the greatest of the B-movie zombie-like genre. It's amazing how many parts of this movie are referenced later in great horror and suspense movies like 28 Days Later and any other semi-holocaust movie. Despite being a 1970s movie, b-type and highly predictable, the movie had me jumping a few times, carried a lot of suspense and the shock is still there. After watching this movie, I'd say Cronenber is definitely one of the most underrated and underestimated craftsmen. 6.5/10 (for the film graininess, thugh 8/10 if you're a Cronenberg fan)
 
Shallow Grave - 1994 Suspense/Drama Staring Ewan McGregor, Kerry Fox and Christopher Eccleston

Three flatmates are tempted by a suitcase full of cash left behind by a new flatmate who dies of a drug overdose on his first night.

Slowly, this group of obnoxious (Ewan), pompous (Christopher) and arrogant (Kerry) flatmates and friends will do just about anything to each other for a suitcase filled with stolen money. A bit eerie as they slowly break down and behave in disturbing ways when faced by temptation.

As dark as it sounds, there are a lot of laughs along with shocking moments. All assembled, acted, edited and presented in excellent form. An entertaining story that is told very well. A real 'must see.'

Definitely one of my favorites. 9/10
 
The Devil Wears Prada - (4/10)
The devil made this film and then made my wife rent it.

Is it supposed to be funny? I couldn't tell. Bad writing, bad acting, predictability out the butt.
 
Are "Forgetting Sarah Marshall" and "My Best Friend's Girl" funny movies or there's something wrong with me? Because I laughed my ass off watching them. I got these movies just to please my girlfriend but ended up enjoying it just as much as she did.

7/10 for both. 👍
 
Are "Forgetting Sarah Marshall" and "My Best Friend's Girl" funny movies or there's something wrong with me? Because I laughed my ass off watching them. I got these movies just to please my girlfriend but ended up enjoying it just as much as she did.

7/10 for both. 👍
My Best Friend's Girl was OK and was doing fine in the humor department, until it hit the same problem nearly all Rom Coms hit, no romantic comedy writer knows how to keep the comedy going the moment it gets into serious relationship problems time. Nor do they know how to not make it predictable. This movie was a bit worse as the setup leading up to it was the funniest part.

Oh, and it is just Hitch redone without Will Smith and a different angle on the matchmaker thing.

I haven't seen Sarah Marshall yet.
 
My weekend was pretty nice in terms of movies:



Shivers (1975) -- Another David Cronenberg classic; this one is perhaps weirder than Rabid, though not in the terror form. The residents of a suburban high-rise apartment building are being infected by a strain of parasites that turn them into mindless, sex-crazed fiends out to infect others by the slightest sexual contact. With that in mind, this movie is certainly 'out there'. The direction is obviously not as polished as in later features, but you can begin to see his signature style translated well into a full-length format. With all that, the movie isn't really that good, but a must for Cronenberg fans. 6.5/10



Frog River (2002) -- Kind of a very underground movie, it's about a record shop clerk and aspiring DJ who searches for his masculinity when challenged to a kendo duel. The movie is Japanese and I have to say that despite its shortcomings, it was quite enjoyable. The music's cool and the acting's alright, though the movie falls short of being anything epic because ofthe insignificance of the final scene. Still, it's a light movie that can be enjoyed when you have a couple of hours to kill. 6/10



The Seven-Ups (1973) -- It's pretty much your average mob vs. police crime movie of the 1970s, except for one little thing: BEST CAR CHASE EVER!!1!. A tough detective who is part of an elite New York City unit is trying to find out who killed his partner, but uncovers a plot to kidnap mobsters for money. The movie itself has been very underrated and Roy Scheider's acting is above par in it. But yet in a time when almost every movie was about crime in some major US city, the car chase wasn't enough toset this one above the rest. However, the car chase is amazing! 7/10



Days of Heaven (1978) -- Back in college I remember watching The Thin Red Line and thinking it was one of the best movies around, and why hadn't the director made more movies?! In the last couple of years I've looked for (and eventually found) Terrence Malick's previous movies: this one and Badlands. Although Badlands and Red Line are amazing movies, this one falls short of anything amazing and maybe it was one of the reasons why Malick deisappeared for so long. Despite having an okay cast at the time (Richard Gere, Brooke Adams and Sam Shepard), none of them helped the movie be any good, though the writing was petty good. Perhaps it was too romantic for what happened in the end of it. 6/10



[REC] (2007) -- Alright, I'm sure some of you have gone and seen Quarantine in theaters... Well, following in Hollywood's amazing creative talent, Quarantine is a remake of this movie. And this movie is amazing. It has the horror/suspense movie I think was missing in most so-called terror movies... and it was made on a very low budget. You can always reference it to Blair Witch Project, but I was much more scared in this one. I guess it has a lot to do with the fact that once you knew the 'secret' behind BWP, it was all pretty funny. Still, REC is amazingly scary, even though it's abut an overly exploited topic (zombies). It may also be because I'm living in Spain and the production and people's reactions are very typical of Spanish documentaries, and the movie starts up as one. I haven't seen Quarantine, though I don't think I want to. Honestly, between this movie and El Orfanato, horror is back... Spanish style. 9/10
 
Last edited:
My Best Friend's Girl was OK and was doing fine in the humor department, until it hit the same problem nearly all Rom Coms hit, no romantic comedy writer knows how to keep the comedy going the moment it gets into serious relationship problems time. Nor do they know how to not make it predictable. This movie was a bit worse as the setup leading up to it was the funniest part.

Oh, and it is just Hitch redone without Will Smith and a different angle on the matchmaker thing.

The Hitch comment definitely applies. I watched My Best Friend's Girl probably a month ago and thought the exact same thing. I think I laughed more at Dane Cook's shirt on the date with the blonde girl he took to the pizza place more than anything else in the movie.
 
Watched my new King Kong blu-ray last night, and just wrote this review for Amazon...

Rating: *****

As a newcomer to the Blu-ray format, and not having this film on DVD already, I thought this would make a good purchase, and I was proved right last night. The film looks absolutely stunning in HD, and the sound is equally superb.

The disc comes complete with two versions of the film - the Theatrical Version and the Extended Version, which adds about 20 minutes of additional footage not in the Theatrical release. The Blu-ray also boasts some cool new types of feature, notably the ability to make your own clips and watch "My Scenes", as well as making your bookmarks, so you can jump to your favourite bits of the film. The extra features come in the form of "U-Control", which enables you to see original concept artwork and/or "picture-in-picture" clips of footage of the film being made, both of which you can watch without interrupting the film, or access from the main menu. There is also the obligatory Feature Commentary with Peter Jackson and Philippa Boyens.

For those who haven't seen the film, I can recommend it whole-heartedly - performances throughout are excellent, and the CGI is convincing and (especially in HD) sometimes truly amazing (particularly the early scenes including Kong himself). The film is a tad long, and it is a bit slow getting going, but the flipside is that you get more involved in the story and understand just how and why this bunch of hapless filmmakers find themselves in their dire predicaments later on...

All in all, a great purchase - I can't say whether movie purists will approve entirely, but in my opinion, this is one remake certainly worth having. The quality throughout demonstrates Jackson's obvious passion and love for the original, and I think he's done a superb job in 'restoring' a classic.
 
Dune - The Extended Cut - (5/10)
I absolutely love the David Lynch version of Dune, but Lynch took his name off of this, and rightly so. The changes make no sense. Typically an extended edition would make more connections to the book. These changes are actually further from the book.
 


10 Items or Less (2006) -- Morgan Freeman having a go at an indie movie, and acting like he's havign a go at an indie movie... you have to see it to understand it. Paz Vega is pretty hot in it, though I'd never consider her for a poor type... she looks to upclass for it. It's a nice story about befriending a complete stranger and making their life better. But nothing too deep. 6/10



He Was a Quiet Man (2007) -- Normally I wouldn't want to watch a movie starring Christian Slater, especially because the movieshe's in could be good except for one detail: Christian Slater... he always acts the same and tends to make all characters seem stupid. This time, he outdid himself... I guess playing a social outcast isn't somethign he's used to and he actually nailed it pretty nicely. The movie is excellent, and probably one of the best I've seen this year, until about 70 minutes in; then it gets a bit weird. Nevertheless, it's a pretty enjoyable movie and I would recommend it. 8.5/10



Chromophobia (2005) -- Kind of a weird story about a bourgeois family slowly coming apart. There's some very good acting in it and many known faces, but nothing too trascendental. 6/10



My Name is Joe (1998) -- Pretty good movie, thuogh the last 20 minutes leave kind of wondering what the hell happened to the story. It's enjoyable and very, very funny. But, keep in mind, the movie is Scottish and the language is... very Scottish. If you're American and want to see it, I strongly recommend subtitles. 7.5/10



The China Syndrome (1979) -- Kind of a made-for-tv air in it, it's a movie about the potential horrors of nuclear energy... funny that it was yars before Chernobyl, and the incident in it is very similar to that. Though it was nominated for 4 Oscars... not bad, but not great by today's standards. 6.5/10



Charlie Wilson's War (2007) -- For a biographical movie, this one's pretty out there. Based on Congressman Charlie Wilson's covert operations in Afghanistan during the 1980s, and his adventures with women... which are very hot, I might add; except for Julia Roberts. Philip Seymour Hoffman is great in it. The movie is part drama part comedy... the comedy part is pretty witty; the drama is biographical in a very Hollywood way. 7.5/10



Cloverfield (2008) -- Meh... as far as hand-held-camera movies go, REC is much better. I actuall laughed out loud during the final credits when the Director or Photography comes up... director of photography? srsly?? Anyway, the whole 'no-explanation' trend in movie monsters lately has me pretty sick of it... I yearn for th return of explained horrors. Also, I didn't feel any tension in the movie... predictable to the end. 4/10
 
FALLEN - 1998 Thriller/Suspense Staring: Denzel Washington, John Goodman, Donald Sutherland and James Gandolfini

Police Detective Hobbes (Washington) tracks down a 'spirit' that murders innocent people.

First off, this story is extremely silly and I just couldn't take it serious enough to give it high marks. The story ruins what is a well assembled cast playing great characters.

As far as a 'thriller' is concerned, I found it too predictable, which completely kills the thrill or suspense factor. It's not horrible, just not as thrilling as it should have been.

The story of 'biblical spirits' just ruins this one for me and is far too silly to completely enjoy. But, the cast is great and so are the characters. 6/10
 
Knowing - A movie about a sheet of paper full of numbers that corresponded to specific dates and the number of deaths on that day. There were three predicted tragedies that haven't happened yet.

The movie was full of action but was pretty graphic at times (watching people burn is not pretty :(). There were some really freaky scenes that were unexpected walking into the movie (dont think i'll be able to sleep tonight). I thought the cast did a spectacular job portraying the roles of the characters. The acting really sold it for me. So...a pretty good movie im my opinion.

8/10

P.S The special events were simply jaw dropping =D..Also dont think you should bring children to the movie. The movie can get quite graphic
 
Last edited:
Nicolas Cage doing some good acting? I like the guy, I really do, but he likes to act the same way just as Shatner likes to talk, like this, all, the time.

I may see it, though.
 
My Name is Bruce - (6.5/10)
Bruce Campbell is recruited to do a new movie, but realizes that it is a real monster. This is a movie written and rected by Campbell so that he can make fun of everyone he has ever worked with. It is ablout as good as it sounds. It had the opportunity to be bad or awesome. It was more bad than awesome.
 


Duck Soup (1933) -- probably one of the Marx brother's finest films. The setting is as absurd as you'd expect: Rufus T. Firefly is named president/dictator of bankrupt Freedonia and declares war on neighboring Sylvania over the love of wealthy Mrs. Teasdale, blah blah blah. Though it has great acting abilities by the brothers and surprisingly funny dialogues, keeping in mind the movie is from over 70 years ago, it's amazing how they exploited the comedy value trying to make a musical and showing how inept the actors can be at it... but in a very funny way. It's #193 in IMDb's Top 250. I give it 8.5/10



A Night at the Opera (1935) -- Another Marx Brothers classic, this one isn't as good as Duck Soup, mostly because the sound annoyed the hell outta me, thanks to the quasi opera that is sung all around. Still, Duck Soup is only a tenth better than this one, so definitely not a movie to be discarded. 8.5/10



Swingers (1996) -- Pretty funny and good movie, with the stylish dialogues that have made other movies famous enough. This one's about wannabe actors who become regulars in the stylish neo-lounge scene, and all the mishaps that are bound to occur when you have a night out on the town with your friends. Kind of a more serious and less tragic take on the Vegas scene in Go.



The Corpse Vanishes (1942) -- Bela Lugosi at the top of his mediocrity and spewing such gems as "I find a coffin much more comfortable than a bed." And with a strong plot like: A scientist, aided by an old hag & her two sons - a malicious dwarf and a brutish moron, kills virgin brides, steals their bodies, & extracts gland fluid to keep his ancient wife alive and young. Thankfuly, this was a MST3K episode, so it made ti worth it. However, since this one's from the first season, the sarcasm wasn't so thick and it was more of letting the movie go on and make a smart ass comment here and there, rather than the more terrorist action they took on crap movie in later seasons. 3/10 for the movie. 5/10 for the MST3K episode.



Robot Monster (1953) -- Thankfuly another MST3K episode, and this one done much better than the previous one, though still part of the 1st season and all the normalcy in it. This movie was actually used in some parts during the Under Pressure music video from Queen. Nevertheless, make no mistake, this is one of the worst moviesin history... but it's great if you're a MST3K fan :) 2/10 for the movie, 7/10 for the episode.



The Hard Way (1991) -- Too hard an attempt to make yet another of the classic 1980s movies, this one with James Woods and Michael J. Fox, both of whom probably weren't the best options, though at the time Woods was a semi action hero. Despite IMDB not referencing it, I'm pretty sure the Eddie Murphy/Robert de Niro movie Showtime is a remake of this one. All in all, an overdone effort to make a so so movie. 6/10



État de siège (1972) -- Really, really good movie, se in Uruguay in the late 1960s, when kindnappings of international ambassadors and embassy figures by the Tupamaros took place and their subsequente torture and death; though the movie is a political thriller. Starts out in a set time and the movie goes back from that time, making references in time to both the future (present movie time) and the past. Very well edited and fast paced, making it not slow at any time, despite being a European movie from 1972. Directed by Costa Gavras! 8.5/10
 
wall-e.jpg


Wall-E 👍👍

After reading some of the reviews from GTPlanet folks I was ready to nix this one from the netflix queue. Somehow I never got around to it and it showed up. Neither I nor the wife were excited about seeing it, but we decided to give it a spin last night.

The movie was preachy - as some here had mentioned. Not only was it preachy, but it was preachy in very silly ways. The notion that we generate enough trash to destroy the planet, or enough satellites to make it impossible to get through orbit without hitting a few is just silly (you'd need soooooo many satellites, and soooooo much trash). I also think the explanation for where everyone went is also quite silly. Of course, there's an element of truth in all of this preachyness, but it's not close to realistic.

The live action mixed in with animation (which some didn't notice, I had several people tell me that just wasn't the case) was annoying. It was almost as though Pixar was claiming their animation was just that good - which it wasn't. Honestly there was no reason for it, and it only served to take me out of the movie. Another element of Pixar over reaching was the roach pet - which was just gross. No Pixar, you can't make just anything cute.

So I noticed the problems. The storyline was linear, the plot was contrived, choices in the effects took me out of the movie, and yet... it still worked on some level.

I have seen Iron Giant, which Duke said was a far superior film... and I think it was and desreved more credit than it got. But Wall-E wasn't junk either. It had some very touching moments, and some good themes (courage, determination, big picture non-conformity). The silliness of the environmentalist message served only to make it easier for me to bear. In the end I think Wall-E was just a fun, cute little movie. Not perfect, certainly it has things that you have to overlook, but it wasn't bad either.

I came to a similar conclusion about Cars - which has about 15 minutes of unmitigated preaching about the evils of progress. Funny how liberals seem to like to preach the small town life and rail against big cities - but none of them actually want to go live in a small town ("No Starbucks!?!"). And despite that Cars was a cute, fun movie - much like Wall-E. I prefer Monsters Inc. or the Increadibles to either one though. Pixar has definitely started to fall off a bit by inserting poorly thought-out politics into their movies. But they still make a product that's watchable and enjoyable.
 
I watched Cadillac Records this evening, the history of Chess Records and the discovery of Blues greats such as Muddy Waters, Little Walter, Howlin' Wolf, Chuck Berry and Etta James. A good storyline and a great movie for people with a real interest in music and it's history.
 
i saw friday13 last week at the movies it rocks i did not mind it going to buy it on dvd when it comes out


I also went to the cinemas over the weekend to watch Friday the 13th, as my wife has been hassling me to take her to watch this latest installment of the series. I had heard from some source (can't remember where) that this was a remake of the original. Well, it wasn't even close to a remake. Jason has for some reason actually changed a little from his previous incarnations, he seems smarter (in the sense that he can now set up traps???) and there is one other notable difference which I won’t mention as I don’t want to spoil the plot….. haha yeah I said plot. It is probably the closest resemblance to a plot out of all the Jason flicks, but in reality each scene is just a setup for the next slaughter.

It is by far the best of the series albeit that is not saying much. It was predicable for the most part, suspense is built but then not used to full affect. I think this is probably because they tried to get too much screen time for Jason. I feel that he appears a little too early in most scenes. The director needs to watch a few Hitchcock movies to better understand suspense building.

Also I was just waiting for a Michael Bay “BOOM” to go off…. I was a little concerned that he wouldn’t be able to write an explosion into the movie but give credit where it’s due, Bay delivered on one explosion at least, although it wasn’t nearly as spectacular as what we are used to seeing from him.

I won’t give it a rating as I don’t think it’s fair to rate it against normal movies, but for a horror/slasher flick it was okay.
 
Back