shemWhat, what, what? I can't see the video.
EDIT: I'm assuming it's the little girl driving her dads car, right?
ninemsn.com.auMore than a dozen passers-by ignored a two-year-old girl as she lay critically injured on a street in southern China after being run over twice, according to the state news agency Xinhua.
The incident has sparked outrage on China's hugely popular social media sites.
Graphic surveillance cameras showed a series of people walk past the girl, named Yue Yue, after she was hit first by a van and then a truck outside her family's shop in the southern Chinese city of Foshan.
Xinhua said a rubbish collector who finally came to the girl's aid, moving her to the curb and shouting for help, was ignored by several shopkeepers before he finally tracked down her mother who took her to hospital.
In response, one netizen on Sina Weibo, a Chinese micro-blog similar to Twitter, wrote: "This society is seriously ill. Even cats and dogs shouldn't be treated so heartlessly."
But others linked the incident to an earlier case in which a man who tried to help an elderly woman after she fell over was prosecuted, apparently because his intervention broke government rules on dealing with accident victims.
Doctors said Yue Yue was in a coma and unlikely to survive the ordeal.
"She would not be able to survive any operations. She's very close to brain death," a spokesman for the hospital treating her told AFP yesterday afternoon.
Police have detained the drivers of both vehicles involved in the incident, Xinhua said.
Man, I feel so bad for China. Communism really destroyed them.
And that has to do with this... how, exactly? I'm sure something similar could've happened anywhere, including non-communist countries.
And that has to do with this... how, exactly? I'm sure something similar could've happened anywhere, including non-communist countries.
But in what country would they say a person that helps an injured person was the right one that caused the injury.
The problem was, in that case, that the person who helped the lady would have been interfering with the situation.
It's the same for traffic accidents, even a small fender bender requires that both cars remain untouched in the middle of the road until the police arrive, even if it's holding up the whole road.
They say that interfering stops the police from effectively assessing the situation and interferes with their work. It's crazy but not down to the countries political standing. It comes down to provincial law usually and most of them are just plain stupid.
That has to be dumbest thing I've ever heard, implying that the person who comes to the aid of another must be the aggressor. Common sense should be taught in school.Speedy SamuraiGood article on CNN (imagine that) about 'bystander dilemma'.
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/10/18/opinion/kreuger-china-incident/index.html?hpt=hp_c2
Also, I believe it was last year in China were a judge ruled that the person who came to the aid of a woman hit by a vehicle must have been the driver because 'only the driver would come to the aid...' and the samaritan ended up in jail. Precedent has been set. In China, helping someone might be the worst thing you can do.
It should, but it isn't like many things.That has to be dumbest thing I've ever heard, implying that the person who comes to the aid of another must be the aggressor. Common sense should be taught in school.
McLarenIt should, but it isn't like many things.
The sad thing is that the "bystander effect" is an issue in the US as well, although nowhere as extreme as what happens in China. But thanks to so many people being sue-happy here, it only takes a quick second for a victim to turn around and sue the person that helped them, knowing they can make an attempt at a quick buck.
It can be a real shameful society we live in at times.
Except those laws do not apply to the entire US & the details of them vary by state. In some, the laws only protect those trained to administer aid & in others, they protect first responders because the law requires them to give aid to a certain degree.In the US we have the Good Samaritan Law which gives immunity from lawsuits for helping someone. It allows people to give basic first aid but does not cover you if you're going to get crazy and try to perform surgery or something along those lines. The biggest problem you would have to deal with is exposure to bodily fluids, who knows if the person bleeding out has some kind of disease.
I just did a little research and you are absolutely correct. I was thinking everywhere else was like Arizona but some states only cover you if you have received certain training or are a first responder. I think regardless of the laws a person should at a minimum call for help, especially if no one else is around!McLarenExcept those laws do not apply to the entire US & the details of them vary by state. In some, the laws only protect those trained to administer aid & in others, they protect first responders because the law requires them to give aid to a certain degree.
The laws help, but they do not protect bystanders completely. There are several loopholes for a victim to sue their rescuer, unfortunately.
Good article on CNN (imagine that) about 'bystander dilemma'.
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/10/18/opinion/kreuger-china-incident/index.html?hpt=hp_c2
Also, I believe it was last year in China were a judge ruled that the person who came to the aid of a woman hit by a vehicle must have been the driver because 'only the driver would come to the aid...' and the samaritan ended up in jail. Precedent has been set. In China, helping someone might be the worst thing you can do.
Please post some type of warning before videos like that, I'd really rather have not seen it at all.At first I was thinking this was a prank, but then I was like, no this is China!