Originally posted by Jordan
Well, I admit, I'm running Windows ME. The reason? I always want the latest-and-greatest, and I picked up the OS when it came out. It's extremely unstable, and it owes me a lot of time for crashing my system in the middle of designing an image or web page (Dreamweaver is OK most of the time, but Fireworks really pushes the limit and you're lucky to get both to run at the same time, even for a few minutes).
I'm dying for XP. But, thanks to Microsoft's EULA enforcement, I'm only going to purchase one Pro Edition for my new system this Christmas. So, I've got to wait even longer. Ideally, I'd love to get a Mac G4 with the beautiful OSX, but Macs are just too expensive when I get more power and compatibility with a PC.
How about you, LoudMusic? (By the way, I added Windows ME to the poll options, in case you're wondering where that came from!)
Wow, I guess I subconsiously don't even give ME credit as an OS, HA HA! Thanks for adding it.
I've left the old Windows behind. I run Windows 2000 on my workstations (all three of them). I run Linux for file and web servers. I've got a couple Macs at work running OS 9, and one at home. My personal workstation boots Windows 2000, Mandrake Linux 8, and BeOS 5. At work I've got two Win2k servers, an NT4 server, a SCO Unix server, a Linux server, and a couple Mac servers. I haven't gotten a chance to play with the latest Amiga OS, but it looks pretty snazzy. My former room mate has a Sun Ultra 10 workstation, so I got to play with Solaris a bit when I lived with him.
My honest opinions/advice:
Windows 2000 (and possibly XP) makes the best desktop/workstation OS for any user doing anything right now. It has more options, software, and support than anything else. And I am including what people claim is best done on a Mac. You'll get that rant later, when I have more energy (:
Linux makes the best small shop server OS for any task. The price is right, the support is there, and the software and programmers are abundant.
Solaris on Sun's hardware, as opposed to Solaris X86 (the crap OS port that went 'pop fizzle') is by far one of the World's best high end "gotta have it, gotta have it NOW" operating systems. There are Solaris servers (and workstations ... ) that have uptimes reaching over three years. And the fact that Sun sells Solaris on servers with up to
106 processors and more than 1/2 TB of memory (over 5 million dollar price tag) ... you know it's some tasty stuff.
MacOS pre OS X was designed as a user friendly system. The idea of it being a 'graphic workstation' was introduced by the customers, not the company. The people that bought Macs in the early days were mostly the creative types. Also, Apple never claimed that Mac OS was stable, fast, dependable, flexible, or that there was a long list of software to go with it. It wasn't until OS X that Apple has used adjectives describing a 'quality' operating system (:
OS X ... time shall tell ... but I know Apple, and I think the future has a rotten core. (ouch, bad pun).
BSD is bad ass, but it takes a determined mind to get what you want out of it.
IRIX was left off the list because the guys that wrote it have all but abandoned it. IRIX is SGI's operating system. If you want a 3D graphic workstation to woop the living crap out of anyone, IRIX on an SGI system is the way to go ... better get out your checkbook, and call a loan officer though, these things don't come cheap.
NeXT got left off as well. NeXT was Steve Job's (CEO of Apple) failed attempt while away from Apple. NeXT was actually far superior to everything around during its time, but people say it was ahead of its time too. By today's standards, it's still pretty haus.
Well, does that answer your question, Jordan? (:
~LoudMusic