Where is the world now?

  • Thread starter Joey D
  • 102 comments
  • 2,378 views
Status
Not open for further replies.
BlazinXtreme
We would have a lot, we have the means to make things....you don't know much about America do you?

Like what............. what raw materials do you have and are you really saying you guys can grow all the plans and other stuff in your back gardens. You might be able to grow most things in greenhouses but that will make your production extremly expensive. I obviously see that your living in LA LA LAND.
 
Young_Warrior
America only got involved in WWII because the germans were gunning down ther ships full off suplies for the allies which america was getting rich off and then america also decided to send their slaves over to fight but the slaves werent allowed to fight along their white americans.

We got rich off of the supplies, eh? Nevermind that Europe is still indebted to the US for billions upon billions upon billions upon billions. We're just going to take your word for it because hey, a guy who hates America is obviously going to be totally unbiased towards them.

You guys are just drowned in propaganda just watch your americans most wanted show and your news channels. Surely the whole world cant be wrong. The american media doesnt show the full picture of the stories which us europeans actually get alot more balanced reports on the situation and thats why even americans allies the British people and the british government critiscise america so much.

(See previous post)
 
BlazinXtreme
We would have a lot, we have the means to make things....you don't know much about America do you?

You dont know much about trade and the rest of the world, if you think the rest of the world will suffer with out US to trade with.

Do you realise just how much stuff the US imports?
 
BlazinXtreme
Don't be an ass, we haven't has slaves for 200 years. NOT ONE PERSON TODAY WAS AFFECTED BY SLAVERY!!!!

Less than 200 hundred years and dont tell me your trying to say that even when slavery was abloshied your nation didnt take advantage off all the black people by paying them meandering fees for their work and sending them off to die for crimes they didnt commit. Its because of slavery why america got so rich so fast.
 
Ghost C
I'm aiming my statements at the citizens of every country. Not the governments - The governments are probably more than willing and ready to send the US aid.

I'm speaking of the biased citizens, the ones who believe that America owes the world something so much that they believe the rest of the world should refuse America aid in it's time of need. The completely biased people who think that America is corrupt, and for that reason we deserve no help - But we should help everyone else, because as we all know corrupt national leaders are always in to forking over billions of dollars in foreign aid EVERY. YEAR.

Basically, the people like Young Warrior or TheCracker.

Get your ****ing head out of your ****ing arse and read what people are saying

I've never said that 'the rest of the world should refuse aid to America - all i've said is that you don't need it

I've never said that 'America is corrupt, and for that reason we deserve no help'

I have, however stated that the rich should help the poor - do you disagree with this?
 
Ghost C
We got rich off of the supplies, eh? Nevermind that Europe is still indebted to the US for billions upon billions upon billions upon billions. We're just going to take your word for it because hey, a guy who hates America is obviously going to be totally unbiased towards them.



(See previous post)

Europe is indebted to the USA because of a certain treaty which forced european counteries to borrow money from the united states to pay each other.

BTW america is in debt for billions and billions and billions and billions too.
 
Small_Fryz
You dont know much about trade and the rest of the world, if you think the rest of the world will suffer with out US to trade with.

Do you realise just how much stuff the US imports?

Do you realize just how much stuff we don't have to import? We import things because we're nice and want the world's economy as a whole to prosper. If one day we felt the urge to cut the rest of the world off, we would begin making everything we import on our own.

Cost, you say? Keep in mind that the creation of all these new jobs would mean that the US economy would be better, all of our money would stay here and every citizen who could work would have a job.

Once again, for the last time. THE US DOES NOT NEED THE REST OF THE WORLD, THE REST OF THE WORLD NEEDS THE US. END OF DISCUSSION, PLEASE RETURN TO THE TOPIC AT HAND.
 
Ghost C
Do you realize just how much stuff we don't have to import? We import things because we're nice and want the world's economy as a whole to prosper. If one day we felt the urge to cut the rest of the world off, we would begin making everything we import on our own.

Cost, you say? Keep in mind that the creation of all these new jobs would mean that the US economy would be better, all of our money would stay here and every citizen who could work would have a job.

Once again, for the last time. THE US DOES NOT NEED THE REST OF THE WORLD, THE REST OF THE WORLD NEEDS THE US. END OF DISCUSSION, PLEASE RETURN TO THE TOPIC AT HAND.

No you IMPORT THINGS BECAUSE IT IS ALLOT CHEAPER FOR YOU TO DO SO.
 
TheCracker
I have, however stated that the rich should help the poor - do you disagree with this?

No. But it doesn't stop there. I think the poor should help the poor, and the poor should help the rich, and everything in between.

If you were walking down the street behind Bill Gates, and somehow he fell and broke both of his legs and arms, would you refuse him help just because he's wealthy?
 
Ghost C
Do you realize just how much stuff we don't have to import? We import things because we're nice and want the world's economy as a whole to prosper. If one day we felt the urge to cut the rest of the world off, we would begin making everything we import on our own.

Cost, you say? Keep in mind that the creation of all these new jobs would mean that the US economy would be better, all of our money would stay here and every citizen who could work would have a job.

Once again, for the last time. THE US DOES NOT NEED THE REST OF THE WORLD, THE REST OF THE WORLD NEEDS THE US. END OF DISCUSSION, PLEASE RETURN TO THE TOPIC AT HAND.

Boy the media sure got ther claws into you and made you into a sack full of propaganda and patriotism of lies.

Hey you guys never found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq but never mind because you sure found the oil.
 
Ghost C
No. But it doesn't stop there. I think the poor should help the poor, and the poor should help the rich, and everything in between.

If you were walking down the street behind Bill Gates, and somehow he fell and broke both of his legs and arms, would you refuse him help just because he's wealthy?


How old are you?

It wouldnt cost anyhting for me to help clinton so yeah I would.
 
Young_Warrior
Hey you guys never found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq but never mind because you sure found the oil.

Yeah, we found the hell out of it. Which is why gas prices are skyrocketing in the US because we lost a major chunk of our refining capabilities.

Stab __ ___ dark. Fill in the blanks.
 
Since this is going nowhere fast, this discussion is over.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back