I assume the the point is related to...
Level 50 feels like a non-achievement within GT7.
Its incredibly easy to achieve this and just sort of happens when you are around completing the cafe menu's. It feels like collector level has no meaning after a certain point: IE, you receive literally nothing for gaining levels.
Most would expect that you would receive something for leveling up something like this and its odd that it doesn't and odd that it just ends. Personally I think the fact that the stop giving you anything at the end of this game, including collector levels, is a purposeful design decision made to slow down your credit earning potential and to push people to MTX.
It looks like PD have seen the backlash here and are looking to amend some of these design decisions but are yet to do enough to completely fix the issue yet.
An easy fix for this would be to continue the levels from 50- to infinity by adding a fixed amount of spending per level from 50 onwards. Each level rewards you with a roulette ticket and every 10 levels is guaranteed to be a 6 star.
-This would also help fix the RNG gated items within GT7 (there are much better fixes for these but if PD continues to keep this system, they need to give out more)
Hey Mr. Sheep that’s a plausible explanation what the Thread Creator most probably could have meant.
Makes Sense looking at it from that Point of View.
Although I have a different experience with the Collector’s Level.
When I finished the Cafe Books,I was just sitting at a shy CL of 26, so far off of that Level 50.
On the other Side i never expected to “get“ or felt the Need to have earned something when Leveling up and therefore having the urge to be gifted with some Reward like Credits or anything.
The Up leveling in itself is a reward for me.
Yesterday i bought almost all Cars there are available in the Game, except the really expensive ones ( the 1Million + ones )
My Collectors Level is still just at Level 42, so I still have a way to go to reach Level 50.
Not that I care if I do so, because like i said to me i don’t look at it the way you described it.
But yes it might be that’s what OP meant 🙂