Would you rather?

  • Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 963,852 views
MX-5 because it's the only car that is actually a sports car, unlike the rest which are just everyday FWD buzzboxes and don't resemble a sports car in any way possible.

Plus, because potential race car.
 
206, such a gorgeous looking car.

800px-DB4GT_Zagato_at_Goodwood.jpg


or

Zagato.jpg


or

db7_zagato_exterior.jpg


or

640px-Red_Aston_Martin_V12_Zagato_fr_IAA_2011.jpg
 
Jeez, that's a tough one!! Good comparison! I think, right now at least, I'd go with the Zagato as it's been my top Aston to drool over since it was revealed.
 
Wow... Just wow. What are you two doing on a motoring forum again?

XS just won the award for the most gloriously ambiguous post in history...
You don't post the names of the cars when you post them so I assumed that the 1st Aston is a nornal one not a zagato.
 
There's 2 Zagatos.

No, there are 4 Zagatos in that post :D

DB4 GT Zagato, V8 Zagato, DB7 Zagato, and V12 Zagato. All of them have bodywork by Zagato.

I think I'm gonna go with the DB7 Zagato. The DB7 Vantage has been one of my favorite cars since I saw it in the game Midtown Madness 2 when I was little. I think it's also the first Aston Martin I knew.

Yes, this one is the DB7 Zagato, but it has similar contours to those of the DB7 Vantage anyway, and it has the same engine. I found it not as pretty as the normal DB7, (the styling may feel "different" but that doesn't make the whole thing prettier) yet I'm still gonna take it.

Yes, some people may find it a questionable choice with the cheap feel of the center console panel and things like that, but whatever.
 
Wow... Just wow. What are you two doing on a motoring forum again?

XS just won the award for the most gloriously ambiguous post in history...
I keep things mysterious... But seriously, I know they're all Zagatos, the Z emblem gives it away, I thought I put V12 Zagato, sorry it's been a nuts day, I've just been super distracted. I literally thought I put V12...
 
They all look the same to me except the blue one. First one looks old, that's about it.
 
1989 Dodge Dynasty

Dodge_Dynasty.jpg


Or

1989 Chevrolet Cavalier

88-90_Chevrolet_Cavalier_sedan.jpg



I can tell you from experience (more experience with the Dodge, however) that both of these are extremely terrible. Which one is better less awful, though?

You probably don't need me to tell you that to see that they are crap. :lol:
 
Cavalier. Aunt had one. It was red. It was a pile. Then it got totalled.


For some reason I thought it was cool back then too lol


@Custom878

That video (Peter) is how I feel lol
 
The Dodge Dynasty, so I can remove some of the decals on the trunk lid to say: "DO NASTY", then pimp it out like all the other Dynasty's around here lol.
 
Aston Martin DB4GT Vantage vs. Aston Martin V8 Zagato vs. Aston Martin DB7 Vantage Zagato vs. Aston Martin V12 Zagato - V12, although I originally wanted to pick the DB4.

Results:
1. Aston Martin V12 Zagato
2. Aston Martin DB4GT Zagato
3. Aston Martin DB7 Vantage Zagato
4. Aston Martin V8 Zagato

Dodge Dynasty vs. Chevrolet Cavalier - Cavalier, because it looks a little less like a piece of crap. Still resembles one though.
 
I think I'd probably most want the DB4 Zagato actually. Though I like both the DB7 and V12 I prefer the oldest of the breed. V8, well...I'd never heard about it until now, but it seems merely alright.

Would you rather:

ferrari_288_gto-hr-manu-02.jpg


Ferrari GTO or:

Lamborghini-Countach-LP5000-QV_1.jpg


Lamborghini Countach LP5000 QV.

I'd take the Countach because what 'QV' actually stands for sounds very silly, plus it does look the part. But the GTO is still a great car no matter what.
 
God damnwhy you doing that to me. Ugh. Lamborghini but only because three 4 barrels.
 
288, no contest.

Hmm...The Peugeot would be the better looking car if it weren't for that hideous, hideous front end, but it's apparently as fast as the TT-S but with better fuel economy, so I'll go with the good fuel economy of the Peugeot.
 
Back