Would you rather?

  • Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 955,023 views
Have fun.

IMG_0567.jpg
 
Rover Mini (2000).

Now this one is a little tricky... Definitely between the 959 and F40. 959 is probably easier to live with, I'll go with that.
 
Cizeta for me.

MINI: Then and Not so Now...

1959 Morris Mini Minor (MK I)
848cc Inline 4 makes 34HP/ Weight: 585Kg (1,290lbs) / 0-60: 26.5 sec. / MPG: 43.5
mini-throwback-3187.jpg


OR

2000 Rover Mini Cooper (MK VII)

1275cc Inline 4 makes 62HP / Weight: 696Kg (1,534lbs) / 0-60: 12.2 sec. / MPG: 38.6
5215224_orig.jpg

Ideally, an Austin Mini/Early Rover Mini :P.

Out of those two, 2000 Rover Mini please.
 
Two-Seaters of 1955

1955 Chevrolet Corvette (C1)
4344cc V8 makes 195HP / 0-60: 8.1 seconds / Trans: 2-Speed Auto / Weight: 2,910 LBS (1,320 KG) / Value: $130,000
c6bdadbcf70e1d853b23fe760e36e223.jpg


1955 Porsche Pre-A 356 Speedster

1290cc Flat 4 makes 50HP / 0-60: 18.5 seconds / Trans: 4-Speed Manual / Weight: 1,675 LBS (760 KG) / Value: $150-200,000
xl_52_749.jpg


1955 MG MGA (MK I) Roadster
1489cc Inline 4 makes 68HP / 0-60: 14.9 seconds / Trans: 4-Speed Manual / Weight: 2,030 LBS (930 KG) / Value: $48,000
autowp_219179234.jpg
 
I have to go with the Speedster. I'm just too much of an air-cooled Porsche/VW fanboy to say no.
@Xavier2342 I'm not seeing photos, but I'd much rather have a CTS-V coupe than a Camaro.
 
1955 Sports Cars - Porsche 356 Speedster, but the C1 Corvette was a close second.
GM Performance Coupes - Cadillac CTS-V, mainly because I think it would be better to live with.
 
Back