Did a plane crash into the Pentagon?
- Thread starter bustwave.
- 71 comments
- 5,151 views
- Status
- 29,984
- Cuddington, Cheshire
- JDA1982
I second that, I also asked Neon why he closed the thread and suggested it shouldn't be closed but it's dropped right into retardedness. I had questions which were answered to my satisfaction in another thread, my advice to anyone who's after proper info on this subject, do a search for all the info, and only use reputable sources, it was a plane that hit the Pentagon, the pentagon vid clearly shows an object lager than a missile, so thats out the question straight away. As for the eye witnesses, when people panic they see all sorts of things, a lot of people relate to an object flying into something and explodig with missiles and rockets, and anyone that didn't get a clear view may use that logic, or lack of it. Find and read Famines post regarding the width of the object since it clipped streeet lights and it matches a plane like 757 or which ever number the plane name has.milefile
- 5,677
It's amazing what people will believe.Lets look at this from a simple perspective. How many of you have taken high school cemistry? Even those that haven't can do a simple google search and find the melting point of aluminum, (660*C for those of you too lazy and 1220*F for those who don't know how to convert) Now, if the fires in the twin towers were hot enough to melt steel (Steel melts at around 1370*C 2500*F) don't you think it would also be hot enough to fry the plane in the pentagon?
5 days after the collapse of the twin towers (on Sept. 16) NASA used an AVIRIS (Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer) to locate and measure the sites hot spots, the east corner of the South Tower had a temperature of 1,377 degrees F was recorded. This is 5 days after the collapse and it's still hot enough to melt the aluminum on a plane.
How many of you know even basic physics? You have to be a complete idiot not to realize that most of that airplane ended up in the Pentagon and not outside it. You didnt find much debris of the TWO airliners that plowed into the towers afterwards why would you expect a lot at the Pentagon?
Lets look at the explosion shall we? Notice that other than the first initial blast of white hot gases, the explosion is composed of flaming red and orange fire with billowing black smoke around it. This is indicative of a jet fuel low-energy explosion and not a high-energy white burst from an explosive on a missile.
But a plane couldnt penetrate that far into the building right? Yeah right gimmie a break, a peice of styrofoam blew up the space shuttle. It is documented through a scientific test that the lightweight Styrofoam can blow a massive hole in the wing edge. Its called momentum. The speed of the object greatly increases its ability to penetrate. If you throw a bullet at someone it wont do much now will it? now shoot it at them and it tears through. Also look at the contruction of the pentagon, it's built in rings, giving the plane greater penetration. How is this possible you say? Well take a peice of paper and stab your pencil into it, it goes through easily right? well now take 100 peices and stack them together, it doesn't work right? well now take those 100 papers and split them into small bunches like the pentagon, its alot easier for the pencil to penetrate when there is space.
How about the tons of eye witnesses that saw the plane? Here are quotes WITH sources, somethign this video has yet to provide.
http://www.dragonslair.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/77/pole_reports.htm#walter
No wreckage eh? http://www.hamptonroads.com/pilotonline/special/911/pentagon3.html
I especially like this quote " Shaeffer stood on a service road that circled the Pentagon between the B and C rings. A chunk of the 757's nose cone and front landing gear lay on the pavement a few feet away, resting against the B Ring wall."
lets look at some pictures:
notice the rivet holes in the picture below
lage chunks of metal and aluminum
Oh look a peice of an engine! and some more of the rivet holes seen in the yellow metal to the right
chunk on landing gear
TLC showed a program named "pentagon under fire" here is a screen shot of one of the landing gear wheels
Here is a pic of actuall landing gear to compare it to
more landing gear
but I guess all that stuff was planted right?
Blackbird.
Premium
- 9,347
- Bay Area
- BlackbirdGTP
- Blackbird5150
I'm confused now. So much evidence to disprove it was a Boeing and now evidence it was a boeing...
Blackbird.
Premium
- 9,347
- Bay Area
- BlackbirdGTP
- Blackbird5150
M5Power
I never said a 767 I just said a Boeing in general.
- Status
