- 3,587
Okay going to edit the above so give me a sec
Okay edited.
Okay edited.
Last edited:
No matter how you define it, it is not a monopoly by definition. It is an exclusive system, exclusive because it is using hardware built to a specific specification for specific purposes. The same reasons why you are buying a game console to begin with are what make them have to use an exclusive system built specifically for them. It is not a monopoly, it is the nature of the product.Once you purchase a PS3, Sony owns PSN and it is the only server you can use. I understand you don't have to buy one but if you buy one specifically for, let's say, GT5 (since it's an exclusive), you're stuck with Sony no matter what happens. You can't choose the parts, the servers the games use, or anything else really. Sony monopolizes the system and all components, by nature (because it is their product). You're stuck with Sony no matter what silliness they come up with, how long they take to respond to their customers, what security risks they take behind your back, etc. You can build a PC from parts manufactured by companies you trust and enjoy, separate companies for each component, each chosen by you. You can choose which online servers are run by companies that represent your point of view and style of gaming, you can customize pretty much anything.
You don't nor did you ever have to support them to play games.I'll probably continue to play GT5 for my friends on GTP and the leagues I'm in, but I'm pretty disgusted with Sony in general and I don't want to feel like to play games I have to support them.
First off, that is only snippity if it is a direct answer to a question. As it was in a paragraph giving more information than was requested, that was their way of saying they understood that the delay in notifying customers of the information that was taken could be interpreted to be in violation of the law. This is actually a very professionally written letter that looks as if it were gone over by about a dozen lawyers. Keep in mind that in Japanese culture they do show more humility, so saying of course in that way is a way of saying "yes I understand my obligation." Cultural difference must be taken into consideration when dealing with international business, a lesson I am having to learn in my current job.As for the law breaking, I'm not saying that's what Sony was doing. I was referring to their response in the letter stating that Sony is "of course" (sounds a bit snippity) aware of the many business regulations requiring them to do such and such regarding users' personal info, however since they're an international company they compromise between the regulations and they even called the regulations "conflicting" or "contradictory" or something to that effect
How do you reach your speculation? Their own internal investigation isn't complete, they found further breaches a week after they began investigating, and they aren't finished. Divulging anything now could be incorrect, harm their investigation, harm any legal investigation, and possibly lead to a bunch of copycats.However they are liable to their customers and groups representing their customers, and "we didn't want to compromise the investigation" is a line police agencies feed the media meaning "we're not ready to talk." There is a legitimate time period during which certain aspects of a criminal case shouldn't be divulged, of course. This is a dirty situation for the company and they're covering themselves, if I could speculate, not merely protecting the integrity of a legal case.
Keyser Soze?“Whether those who participated in the denial of services attacks were conspirators or whether they were simply duped into providing cover for a very clever thief, we may never know. In any case, those who participated in the denial of service attacks should understand that – whether they knew it or not – they were aiding in a well planned, well executed, large-scale theft…”
That should be their top priority. That is the number one motivation to keep a company honest. That is why any company does anything they do, including philanthropy. I trust a profiit-driven company motivated by the desire to have me want to shop at their store far more than one that will work with the government to bring about change to improve the world.I just don't buy that Sony is spic-and-span and that they give a too much a hoot about their customers except that they want people to keep spending money at the playstation store.
Where are they trying to sweeten you up? It is all basically PR and legal statements. The only persona I see is that of a victim, which they are.I know my analogies aren't perfect but rather than have everyone pick at them let me ignore the analogies a second and just say what I'm trying to say:
Sony's persona to the public right now is easy to see through and I strongly feel the nature of the company is not necessarily in our best interests despite their outward political smile.
No matter how you define it, it is not a monopoly by definition. It is an exclusive system, exclusive because it is using hardware built to a specific specification for specific purposes. The same reasons why you are buying a game console to begin with are what make them have to use an exclusive system built specifically for them. It is not a monopoly, it is the nature of the product.
You don't nor did you ever have to support them to play games.
Still not sure why you are disgusted with them. Read the Kotaku article I posted earlier. An expert says it could happen to anyone, and happens daily. This one just happens to involve a company and industry the media has an obsession with.
First off, that is only snippity if it is a direct answer to a question. As it was in a paragraph giving more information than was requested, that was their way of saying they understood that the delay in notifying customers of the information that was taken could be interpreted to be in violation of the law. This is actually a very professionally written letter that looks as if it were gone over by about a dozen lawyers. Keep in mind that in Japanese culture they do show more humility, so saying of course in that way is a way of saying "yes I understand my obligation." Cultural difference must be taken into consideration when dealing with international business, a lesson I am having to learn in my current job.
That said, they did not say they ignored any one law, but in order to work within the framework of all the laws they are covered under they could not release information to customers regarding their personal information being stolen until they had confirmation that what they reported was taken. They weren't compromising, they were acting in a way to follow all relevant regulations.
How do you reach your speculation? Their own internal investigation isn't complete, they found further breaches a week after they began investigating, and they aren't finished. Divulging anything now could be incorrect, harm their investigation, harm any legal investigation, and possibly lead to a bunch of copycats.
Keyser Soze?
EDIT: Just saw this bit added.
That should be their top priority. That is the number one motivation to keep a company honest. That is why any company does anything they do, including philanthropy. I trust a profiit-driven company motivated by the desire to have me want to shop at their store far more than one that will work with the government to bring about change to improve the world.
Where are they trying to sweeten you up? It is all basically PR and legal statements. The only persona I see is that of a victim, which they are.
I am confused by this statement and maybe I am missing something but you can upgrade hard drives in the PS3 on your own and it doesn't break the warranty of the system. You can use any brand hard drive that meets the size requirements. That isn't true of their main competitor though. And if you are going to send something to them for repair, of course they are going to charge you. Try taking your system to a local gaming shop for repair and see if they do it for free. Again, maybe I misunderstood and if I did I apologize ahead of time.I'm using the term monopoly much more loosely than its specific business practice definition, and the one you're probably referring to. I mean they "monopolize" such as "To dominate by excluding others" (dictionary definition). They control the manufacture of their system and make it all but useless to upgrade or alter the system's components. I doubt you could even swap a dead harddrive without paying Sony an arm and a leg by shipping the system out to their headquarters. I'm just saying you have more choices as a consumer with PC gaming. With a PS3 you're stuck with however Sony chooses to run their business.
Here is one of the pages by Sony answering questions.
....
Very interesting. I already read comments about this 8 pages-long document but so far didn't actually see any of it. Do you have a link to the other 7 pages?? If you do, can you share it?
Very interesting. I already read comments about this 8 pages-long document but so far didn't actually see any of it. Do you have a link to the other 7 pages?? If you do, can you share it?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/playstationblog/sets/72157626521862165/
I wasn't going to post this but just some of my perspective on business in general and Sony....
Side note; My 1st gen ps3 died, I'm not as enthused with gt5 as I was with earlier installments, I'm in no hurry to see psn back up and running nor in a hurry to buy another ps3.
Where's your source?this is just.....harsh
We discovered that the intruders had planted a file on one of our Sony Online Entertainment servers named “Anonymous” with the words “We are Legion.”
- Or maybe you should understand what a DOS attack is before you enlighten us with that nonsense. DDOS which is just flooding a server with so many packets it can't handle it and crashes, any one of the 9000+ people that participated that day had nothing to do with the actual intrusion.those who participated in the denial of service attacks should understand that – whether they knew it or not – they were aiding in a well planned, well executed, large-scale theft
this is just.....harsh
We discovered that the intruders had planted a file on one of our Sony Online Entertainment servers named “Anonymous” with the words “We are Legion.”
I have seen stories now on the web stating:
"Sony confirms that Anonymous hacked the PSN"
When in fact the file was found on the SOE servers as your quote states.
- Or maybe you should understand what a DOS attack is before you enlighten us with that nonsense. DDOS which is just flooding a server with so many packets it can't handle it and crashes, any one of the 9000+ people that participated that day had nothing to do with the actual intrusion
Well written piece. My first $600 fat 80gig died too, in 13 months.
And after 13 months you got a different referb from Sony or had the ps3 reballed or bought a new one? That bothers me 👎
Where's your source?
If that really happened then my 🤬 hats off to them. They warned and warned Sony that a big attack would happen and Sony shrugged it off. If a file was left with this name then that's a big win for Anonymous.
They have been touted as 15 year old's launching Botnet DDOS attacks, if this really was the case this shows while majority of members are under 25 they have shown to have some real capability ( DDOS doesn't require capability )
Or maybe you should understand what a DOS attack is before you enlighten us with that nonsense. DDOS which is just flooding a server with so many packets it can't handle it and crashes, any one of the 9000+ people that participated that day had nothing to do with the actual intrusion.
That's why Anonymous is so effective, it's not just 2 or 3 consumer's writing a letter of complaint , as the Mantra states " We are legion " they have thousands upon thousands of willing participants . It's the start of the consumer revolution.
The DOS attack being regarded as the main threat whilst being a cover for the actual operation is just plain clever, if i had participated in a botnet that ultimately in the end brought down Sony for over a week i'd be even happier knowing that.
.There is nothing illegal about a DOS or DDOS attack - yes they are slightly different. There is plenty illegal about theft of information though - but Anonymous whilst some of you perceive them to be - they aren't stupid, they will not un-neccesarily attract the attention of the F.B.I , there isn't going to be any stolen credit card's used or any of that other hysteria you created amongst your internal dialogue.
# May 2 (Monday) - Sony receives Congressional inquiry; Sony issues a statement that 12,700 credit cards and 24.6 million accounts were compromised in SOE data theft
Its about " the free flow of information " It should NOT be illegal to post a " how to " video on the internet. Information is free and everyone has a right to it and SHOULD be protected.
Are you talking about a vid Geo Hot posted? I've not seen it so I don't know if it was simply showing how to modify the ps3 physically or what.
I don't think you are entirely correct about the legality though, surely it is illegal to make a "how to vid" if on that vid you are commetting a crime? As in it would be legal to show a vid on how to murder if it showed a mock murder performed on a dummy rather then a live person who died?
EDIT: oops dp
Any may i ask WTF do you care if a few people hack it and get stuff for free? Million's of people are still going to do the right thing and buy console's,buy games,get raped for DLC, buy accessories. Your a bit naive if you think console games are going to die out and not be profitable because a few people are jailbreaking them jesus christ.
Perhaps the vid is not illegal but the crime is and you can be prosecuted for that, after all it's pretty clear evidence.
Its about " the free flow of information " It should NOT be illegal to post a " how to " video on the internet. Information is free and everyone has a right to it and SHOULD be protected.
No one should have the right to censor information - if you believe this, i couldn't care less about trying to convince you otherwise.
If governments or company's control information, then they control you - think about it ?
Your ignorant if you think this is all about hacking a PS3, the issue is deeper.This is about human rights and the free flow of information.They not only removed the information they demanded to know the IP of all who viewed the information. This is not acceptable.
The internet is one of the last bastion's of free flow of information, through the internet everyone in the world has access to information, when we information we are strong and can make a difference.
This is why the Government is moving on Wikleaks, this is what they fear ,they fear our power when we unite. Do not forget that.
-Yes, we are free to publish information for public consumption. But the PS3 root key was coded by and is property of Sony. In other words, you are giving people something for free that someone else spent millions of dollars developing. Not that I am naive enough to believe that such things could be kept secret forever, but Sony has a right to protect their investments.
-
Really, would you feel the same if it were a starving indie music artist and someone had just released their entire catalog for download on the internet? This is less "Ve haf ways to keep joo quiet" and more like: "Dude! You stole my code!!!"