Tired Tyres
Premium
- 12,605
- West Yorkshire
- Tired_Tyres
- Tired Tyres
They would to get the diffuser to work properly with their cars though, and with no testing that is no small task.
It's rearranging the rear end of he car - gearbox, suspension et al - that it most likely going to provide more problems.
Super-soft and Medium tires are going to be used at this weekend's Grand Prix. Unbelievable![]()
Double world champion Fernando Alonso is 'very worried' about Bridgestone's decision to bring super-soft compounds as the option tyre for this weekend's Chinese Grand Prix, the Spaniard saying it is entirely unsuited to the abrasive nature of the Shanghai circuit.
The Renault driver claims that the use of the tyre makes the drivers 'look ridiculous' because of the time differential between the option and prime rubber - which was as much as six seconds when the super-soft and hard tyres were used in Australia.
"I think it is the worst decision they made in a long time, because it is a ridiculous tyre for here, for Shanghai," he said.
"I don't know if Bridgestone made the decision or the FIA, but they have to reconsider this type of decision because we look ridiculous on television and we look ridiculous for the spectators, and it is a joke to be in front of TV six seconds slower.
"We will need to change the tyres after five or six laps, is our calculation, because this track is harder than Melbourne and there we only did eight or nine laps.
"And if they want to be funny and mix the results and have overtaking, they can do a better job a funny solution, maybe they can put us on the wet tyres or something. Like this it looks more spectacular the difference in the speed. I don't know...
"I'm very worried about this and I'm very sad about this, because we look strange in front of people."
Alonso also revealed that the drivers have not been consulted on which tyres should be used, and added that the Grand Prix Drivers' Association (GPDA) expressed their fears over safety on the issue following the Australian Grand Prix, when Robert Kubica and Sebastian Vettel collided while contesting second place.
"We expressed our concerns after Australia, after the accident of Robert Kubica and Sebastian Vettel it was due to the difference of the speed," he said.
"He (Kubica) tried to overtake, Vettel was not in control of the car with that tyre, you cannot brake, you cannot turn-in, you cannot do anything. And then Robert had a big crash after that because he damaged the car.
"Then we expressed our concerns and now in the third race we have the same tyre at a worse circuit. This is something that we need to change immediately."
Alonso added that he considered both the super-soft and the hard tyres to be unsuited to Shanghai.
"I think the super-soft on this type of circuit with long, high-speed corners... in Turn 1 it will be destroyed and in Turn 10 there will be no more left tyre.
"One will be too hard and one will be too soft. The right tyre is at home! The soft tyre is at home, and this happened in Australia as well. And the understanding that this is for a better show, for overtaking...
"As I said, for a better show, maybe we can pick up our number and then whoever picks up number 15 can put on wet tyres, or whatever, and it is a better show and it's funny. Like this it is not funny."
I would have to agree with you to an extent, although the Brawn chassis is a far superior design to anything Honda had produced in their F1 days. It's been said that the Honda chassis would had made it to Q3 pretty consistently last season, had they had equal power to that of Ferrari and Mercedes/Mclaren. I believe they were down ~35-40hp last season. So power was definitely a main issue as to why they were no where near competitive in their later years. But it must be said that it was likely not all of their inferiorities, as their aero was still inferior to what Macca and Ferrari had produced, as Do You Race touched on.
Aren't Brawn's current engineers and designers former engineers from Honda? They bought the team didn't they? Brawn's car is a honda chassis with a mclaren engine isn't it?
The Honda designer was an idiot though and he has rightly disappeared along with Honda.
Shuei, "the man with the anti-midas touch", the only man who could look at a car and cause it to lose 20% of it's downforce, the man responsible for the RA07 and RA08 fiascos, disappeared between 2007 and 2008 - and the Honda engineers responsible for the RA09/BGP001 are still present.
He very quietly jumped ship four days before Honda officially withdrew. Before that he'd mostly been involved in deigning Honda's racing bikes, but he had played a part in Honda's still-born RA099 project. Maybe the RA107 and 108 would have been competitive then ...Shuei, "the man with the anti-midas touch", the only man who could look at a car and cause it to lose 20% of it's downforce, the man responsible for the RA07 and RA08 fiascos, disappeared between 2007 and 2008 - and the Honda engineers responsible for the RA09/BGP001 are still present.
Actually, I think there's one or two major guys that they poached from the likes of Williams and BMW when they realised the RA-series was ging to need all the help it could get.But technically they aren't from Honda, they are mostly the BAR-staff some are probably even ex-Tyrrell staff, as in, they've always been there and Honda has little to do with it.
He very quietly jumped ship four days before Honda officially withdrew. Before that he'd mostly been involved in deigning Honda's racing bikes, but he had played a part in Honda's still-born RA099 project. Maybe the RA107 and 108 would have been competitive then ...
Actually, I think there's one or two major guys that they poached from the likes of Williams and BMW when they realised the RA-series was ging to need all the help it could get.
Wasn't Willis the designer of the RA106 who left mid-season after a spat with Nick Fry - before Button's maiden victory in Hungary - and was replaced by Nakamoto when he was snapped up by Red Bull? Nakamoto developed the RA107, but when it performed so poorly, Honda scrambled to find people who could rectify the problem (I'm not sure how true the story was that the car's bad aerodynamics were a byproduct of a poorly-calibrated wind tunnel), and they got Loic Bigois and Jorg Zander, the latter of whom was promoted to lead designer for the BGP-001.Yup - Geoff Willis, Williams designer. Quite a good one, at that.
[FPV]Rusty;3367334most the drivers set their fastest lap times earlier in the session, and couldn't better them in their final runs.
Wasn't Willis the designer of the RA106 who left mid-season after a spat with Nick Fry - before Button's maiden victory in Hungary - and was replaced by Nakamoto when he was snapped up by Red Bull? Nakamoto developed the RA107, but when it performed so poorly, Honda scrambled to find people who could rectify the problem (I'm not sure how true the story was that the car's bad aerodynamics were a byproduct of a poorly-calibrated wind tunnel), and they got Loic Bigois and Jorg Zander, the latter of whom was promoted to lead designer for the BGP-001.
No diffuser for Ferrari? Massa had an awful practice...
And quicker than both Ferraris, both McLarens, both BMWs, both Renaults and only three hundreths of a second short of being quicker than both Toro Rossos.In other News, Sutil in 10th!