2009 Nissan GT-R - Zero tolerance for asshattery

  • Thread starter emad
  • 3,050 comments
  • 152,302 views
The used Gallardo wouldn't be any faster. And it is a used Italian car.
but its a "lamborghini" and will sound better,go better,feel better to drive,more sense of an "occasion" when driving it and dare i say,more reliable,since this is nissan's first attempt at making a car of this standard.

if you ask people what they would rather own i could safely say 8/10 will go for the lambo.
 
but its a "lamborghini" and will sound better,
Probably true.
go better,
Patently false, assuming you mean acceleration.
feel better to drive,
Probably false.
more sense of an "occasion" when driving it
Probably true.
and dare i say,more reliable,since this is nissan's first attempt at making a car of this standard.
Could go either way.
if you ask people what they would rather own i could safely say 8/10 will go for the lambo.
I'd say that number is low. I'm guessing it is closer to 9/10.
Don't get me wrong, I wasn't arguing with you. I was merely stating some facts. I know that if I had GT-R money, I wouldn't buy a GT-R. I would buy a 512TR.
 
On the surface, the Lambo would be the obvious choice. On the basis of every day usability however, the Nissan is much better off, which is why I'd actually take the latter as an everyday car instead of having the Lambo and some cheap banger.
 
its est to between £55-60k


hmmm a GTR or this :D

And with extras I'm sure I could add quite a bit to the estimated price of the RS6.

The point remains that five minutes worth of work (at most) quickly shows that the most quoted estimated price for the GT-R is £55k, with the RS6 being a good £20k more. Hell even if you take the GT-R at £60k that's still a £15k difference, which is a long way from being close in price.


Regards

Scaff
 
not looking good for importers
Nissan to clamp down on ‘trademark violations’
Or, if they were being completely transparent: "Nissan to clamp down on GT-R grey imports"

Nissan has announced that its legal team has been in touch with several ‘Grey Import’ companies who are, “suspected of importing and/or offering for sale in the European Economic Area, Nissan vehicles originating from Japan and which are intended only for sale in Japan”

Nissan has warned them not to offer these vehicles for sale and, should they continue, the Japanese company has said it will “seek the support of the English courts in enforcing its legitimate rights against those businesses.”

Nissan may find this problematic though, since as far as we (or anyone we spoke to) is aware, there is no precedent for a case of this kind - that relates to the automotive industry at least - in UK law.

It seems pretty clear that this issue is centred on the GT-R supercar, with Gary Frigo, Nissan Motor (GB) Limited’s Managing Director, saying: “Nissan’s number one priority is to ensure that the GT-R and its dealer network are in optimal condition to facilitate and support our customers. It will take until start of sales in March 2009 to do this. Until that time the UK will have no GT-R trained technicians, no established GT-R parts supply and, most crucial of all, the GT-R will not be covered by a manufacturer’s warranty.”


This all seems like a bit of a kick in the teeth for the enthusiasts who cultivated the Skyline’s cult following in this country into something more akin to a legend. If it wasn’t for grey importers, it’s unlikely that the Skyline would have become enough of a well known and respected brand in key markets like the USA and Europe, to generate a potential customer base large enough for a model like the GT-R to be worth developing.

It seems a pity that they’re willing to risk alienating the people who made the brand a success, for the sake of gaining control of the car’s launch – especially given the tiny number of people willing to go to the trouble of importing the car early from Japan.

What sort of an impact will this have on the ‘Skyline Cult’? Who knows, but it probably won’t be good for Nissan if it starts throwing its weight around on this one.

Oh, and by the way, we’ve heard that the Skyline could come to Britain for as little as £55k.
theres already 2 dealers in scotland selling them for around £40k,still expect to see a couple show up at knockhill in the next year.
 
but its a "lamborghini" and will sound better,go better,feel better to drive,more sense of an "occasion" when driving it and dare i say,more reliable,since this is nissan's first attempt at making a car of this standard.

if you ask people what they would rather own i could safely say 8/10 will go for the lambo.
Only the Superleggera will be taking on the GT-R. A 2003 Gallardo, though, certainly won't, esp. not when its running now out-dated technology with a 500Hp engine. The 2008 models though, are much better, but probably not enough to really hurt the GT-R, even with 520 horses.

As for what you're asking, that's a situation that's not even fair. You can ask that question comparing the GT-R to any other car, the results will remain 7-9/10 for the other. Why? Because you're going to be asking folks to pick a Nissan or a Lamborghini/Ferrari/Corvette/Porsche. The latter will obviously be chosen based on brand.
 
As for what you're asking, that's a situation that's not even fair. You can ask that question comparing the GT-R to any other car, the results will remain 7-9/10 for the other. Why? Because you're going to be asking folks to pick a Nissan or a Lamborghini/Ferrari/Corvette/Porsche. The latter will obviously be chosen based on brand.
but at the end of the day you arent going to buy a car you dont like.Rough est for the GTR in the uk is £55-65k so say you had £60k to spend on a car.
if you wanting a sports/supercar you can have a Gallardo,Ferrari 360,audi R8(if you look hard enough),997 GT3(again if you look hard enough)996 GT3RS,
E92 M3,M6,CLK55,Z06,Viper,M12,Ultima GTR,diablo.

or if your wanting something abit practical RS6+,M5,E63 etc

call it badge snobbery if you wish but if you had £60k would the first thing you think be nissan? and would you go through with buying one? i mean look at the uk sales of the nsx and even though it wasnt brought over in huge numbers the R34 wasnt exactly a huge seller.

another interesting thing i read today.
Nissan expects the 30-49 age group to account for 35.2% of sales, the 50-59 age group 33.4% and 60-68 some 22.4% of sales.
 
call it badge snobbery if you wish but if you had £60k would the first thing you think be nissan? and would you go through with buying one? i mean look at the uk sales of the nsx and even though it wasnt brought over in huge numbers the R34 wasnt exactly a huge seller.

If I had the money to afford a Lamborghini Diablo over a GT-R, of course I would take the Lamborghini. Why? Because it's a Lamborghini, duh! I mean, c'mon, we're talking about owning a Lamborghini/BMW M3/Porsche etc. Everyone should know most folks would kill to own those cars. But what we need to realize is that we're talking about folks who will be using these cars as show vehicles, not for what the GT-R is built for.

Put it this way.
If you survey a random group of folks of whether they'll want a Nissan GT-R or a Lamborghini Gallardo, who will win? Lamborghini, duh. The folks you're interviewing won't even be thinking about tracking the car.

Now, survey a group of people who are centered around track racing. Who will win? Probably 50/50 since some won't want to pass up owning a Lamborghini. But for that other 50, you'll see folks actually picking the GT-R because it matches exactly what they need because their lives center around tracking.


This is why I said earlier Nissan made a good decision to market the car at $70K in the US. Low enough where a profit will be made, and not so high that brand snobs will stay at bay as they will be thinking, "Well, if Chevrolet can price a Corvette near a Viper, then I guess Nissan can too with a car that's the successor to the Skyline GT-R."
 
This is why I said earlier Nissan made a good decision to market the car at $70K in the US. Low enough where a profit will be made, and not so high that brand snobs will stay at bay as they will be thinking, "Well, if Chevrolet can price a Corvette near a Viper, then I guess Nissan can too with a car that's the successor to the Skyline GT-R."
but i was talking about the uk market :confused: and the gallardo isnt that bad around a race track and hopefully in the next year i can say how well the GTR can go round knockhill(although that being said knockhill doesnt favour heavy cars although lambos seem to go round fast enough.)
if you start to question people who want more of a track car then it does have a problem up against cars like the noble M12,M14,Ultima GTR,996 GT3RS etc.
 
A trio of track-built specials with little or no warranty or everyday usability, (Trailer queen, if you will, even though It can kinda be driven on a nice road on a good day) and an absurdly expensive alternative.

But, hey, You want to conduct this crusade against everyone who says something nice about the GT-R. Who's stopping you?
 
A trio of track-built specials with little or no warranty or everyday usability, (Trailer queen, if you will, even though It can kinda be driven on a nice road on a good day) and an absurdly expensive alternative.

But, hey, You want to conduct this crusade against everyone who says something nice about the GT-R. Who's stopping you?
plenty of people use nobles daily :confused: just because you dont see them being daily driven where you live doesnt mean they arent,ultima GTR is abit more questionable and they arent expensive considering how much the GTR is.Building a fast car is one thing but building a desirable car that has to sell considering the rivals the GTR has in the UK is a whole other ball game.It has a very hard job in front of it.
 
but i was talking about the uk market
:confused:
I don't know the prices of the GT-R in the UK market. I don't even know if they've been released.
and the gallardo isnt that bad around a race track and hopefully in the next year i can say how well the GTR can go round knockhill(although that being said knockhill doesnt favour heavy cars although lambos seem to go round fast enough.)
True, the Gallardo isn't bad, but it took it a few years until the extra 20 horses were added to really start being a competitive car.
if you start to question people who want more of a track car then it does have a problem up against cars like the noble M12,M14,Ultima GTR,996 GT3RS etc.
That's true, however, you'll see the GT-R will still stand a better chance of being chosen than the Lamborghini's or Ferrari's.

However, I was not talking about dedicated track cars. I was talking about if you compared the GT-R to a Gallardo, F430, or 911 Turbo. Normal folks will hurt the GT-R's chances of being picked b/c all they see is a Nissan & a Ferrari, not performance numbers. However, it'll become a 50/50 decision to track oriented folks b/c they'll be looking at stats, not badges. Anyways, I'm talking about them being asked on which would they rather have, the GT-R or the F430? Not, just pick any random car.
 
Oh...kay. But I do know what a Noble is, and I doubt it's very comfortable, or has any sort of a decent warranty. I don't remember, But I don't even think they come with engines. or you choose what engine they install for you. If they want to drive around in that everyday, fine, more power to them. But my Chevy Nova probably rides smoother.

and, given the gray-market R32s, R33s, and R34s already in the U.K., they should have no problem finding owners for the R35s. I mean, when people are importing a car from it's home market, doesnt' that say something about what might happen when it goes global?

I'm not going to say it's going to be a sensation, all I'm saying is that there is international demand for the GT-R, and Nissan thinks there's enough that there'll be a profit.
 
Oh...kay. But I do know what a Noble is, and I doubt it's very comfortable, or has any sort of a decent warranty. I don't remember, But I don't even think they come with engines. or you choose what engine they install for you. If they want to drive around in that everyday, fine, more power to them. But my Chevy Nova probably rides smoother.

and, given the gray-market R32s, R33s, and R34s already in the U.K., they should have no problem finding owners for the R35s. I mean, when people are importing a car from it's home market, doesnt' that say something about what might happen when it goes global?

I'm not going to say it's going to be a sensation, all I'm saying is that there is international demand for the GT-R, and Nissan thinks there's enough that there'll be a profit.
Nobles in the UK are sold with their engines. In the US, they were sold as kit cars so the engine had to be purchased at a different time making the car worth around $90,000. However, 3G (the importer) created Rossion, and will continue to sell the "M400" here under the Rossion Q1. That way, Americans can still get one without going through all the importing.
 
I don't know the prices of the GT-R in the UK market. I don't even know if they've been released
They havent been released yet wont be till the Geneva Motorshow but figures of between £55k-65k have been said so thats why i was using £60k as the in the middle figure.

However, it'll become a 50/50 decision to track oriented folks b/c they'll be looking at stats, not badges. Anyways, I'm talking about them being asked on which would they rather have, the GT-R or the F430? Not, just pick any random car.
but how many of the people that guy GTR's will track it? maybe 15-20%?

Oh...kay. But I do know what a Noble is, and I doubt it's very comfortable, or has any sort of a decent warranty. I don't remember, But I don't even think they come with engines. or you choose what engine they install for you. If they want to drive around in that everyday, fine, more power to them. But my Chevy Nova probably rides smoother.
nobles come with 3.0litre twin turbo V6's and do have a warranty,Ultimas you can choose what engine you want but there are factory versions (500/550/640/720/820) and nobles are surprisingly rather comfortible.

and, given the gray-market R32s, R33s, and R34s already in the U.K., they should have no problem finding owners for the R35s. I mean, when people are importing a car from it's home market, doesnt' that say something about what might happen when it goes global?
not much of a market though if you add up the numbers

there was only around 200 grey R32's,200 uk spec R33's and maybe another 200 grey's not 100% sure on R34 uk sales but i think it was around 300-400 cars and considering nissan are hoping to sell 2000 cars per year which is a rather tall order to do.

it does so how much of a rip off the uk is though £33,500 in japan,£35,000 in america but around £60,000 in the uk!
 
Ever tried shipping a car across two ponds or across the entire Europe Eurasia continents?

Cost of life is also much higher in the UK. Fits the market just fine.
 
but how many of the people that guy GTR's will track it? maybe 15-20%?
Why are you changing the discussion? I'm not talking about who will or won't track the car. I'm talking about the people who will know what this car is about compared to the random folks who would only buy a Ferrari over it because it's a Ferrari.
 
not much of a market though if you add up the numbers

there was only around 200 grey R32's,200 uk spec R33's and maybe another 200 grey's not 100% sure on R34 uk sales but i think it was around 300-400 cars and considering nissan are hoping to sell 2000 cars per year which is a rather tall order to do.

Wait... seriously? You brought up the Noble, and now are talking about how there isn't much of a market for the GT-R based on the couple hundred grey imports?

How many Nobles have actually been sold in the UK? I don't know if "plenty of people" really applies.
 
Ever tried shipping a car across two ponds or across the entire Europe Eurasia continents?
you can import a GTR to the uk and get all the tests done on it for under £40k so you cant use that as an excuse :rolleyes:

Why are you changing the discussion? I'm not talking about who will or won't track the car. I'm talking about the people who will know what this car is about compared to the random folks who would only buy a Ferrari over it because it's a Ferrari.
you were talking about people who are centered around track racing that would buy it aswell.

Wait... seriously? You brought up the Noble, and now are talking about how there isn't much of a market for the GT-R based on the couple hundred grey imports?
that was in reference to how many nissan are expecting to sell per year which is alot considering how many sales there was of UK spec skyline gtr's and the honda nsx.

How many Nobles have actually been sold in the UK? I don't know if "plenty of people" really applies.

there have been at least well over 500 nobles sold in the uk
 
call it badge snobbery if you wish but if you had £60k would the first thing you think be nissan? and would you go through with buying one? i mean look at the uk sales of the nsx and even though it wasnt brought over in huge numbers the R34 wasnt exactly a huge seller.

another interesting thing i read today.

Every single R34 that Nissan GB brought into the country (approx 200 of them) sold out before the boats landed, onto of that a substantial number came over as grey-imports (look for the oil cooler on the rear diff as the easiest way to tell the difference - true UK models have one fitted).

When I was working for Renault/Nissan the marketing department would regularly get calls asking if they wanted to sell the press fleet R34, all offers were well over the value of the car.

Its also incredibly disingenuous to say that Nissan has no experience is selling true sports cars, while the price point may be lower they have more than enough with regard to the 240Z, 350Z, etc.

I also find it a bit strange to imply that people will not take it seriously because it has a Nissan badge on it, given the reputation that the R32/R33/R34 have around the world that Nissan badge is exactly why they are taking it seriously. You can put money on Porsche taking it very seriously indeed. Just because the mainstream Nissan product is dull makes no difference at all, I happen to think that the mainstream Audi range is dull (well built but dull), that does not stop me thinking the R8 is an amazing car.

Simple point is that more than enough people are able to look past the badge and look at Nissan's history with what ws the Skyline range to be very excited about this car. Hell the first drives from magazines around the world are more than enough to clearly show that.

To dislike a car is one thing (and something I have no issue with at all), but to then use that as a reason to dismiss the car, which is how a lot of your comments read to me, is quite an other thing.


Regards

Scaff

BTW - Having had a very good look around last night the vast, vast majority of estimated prices for the GT-R put it at £55k, I've not personally found a single one putting it as high as £65k.
 
Every single R34 that Nissan GB brought into the country (approx 200 of them) sold out before the boats landed, onto of that a substantial number came over as grey-imports (look for the oil cooler on the rear diff as the easiest way to tell the difference - true UK models have one fitted).
And if they were confident in selling more they would have brought over more wouldnt they? so why didnt they? (genuine question)

Its also incredibly disingenuous to say that Nissan has no experience is selling true sports cars, while the price point may be lower they have more than enough with regard to the 240Z, 350Z, etc.
Never said they have had problem selling sportscars :confused: i was refering to to what they would class as a "supercar".i think i can safely say nissan doesnt have much experience in selling this kind of car after all this car has almost twice the power of a 350z,costs twice as much,goes twice as fast,does nearly 200mph.how many nissans have they tried to sell in the passed that does all those things?

I also find it a bit strange to imply that people will not take it seriously because it has a Nissan badge on it, given the reputation that the R32/R33/R34 have around the world that Nissan badge is exactly why they are taking it seriously.
So why on the R32.R33,R34 GTR's did they basicly take off the nissan badges and replace them with GTR ones 💡

To dislike a car is one thing (and something I have no issue with at all), but to then use that as a reason to dismiss the car, which is how a lot of your comments read to me, is quite an other thing.
ive not said that i dislike this car,it might not have many rivals in japan or in america compared with cost,but in the UK where it costs almost twice as much it does have a huge job in front of it and im simply trying to highlight that it isnt going to have a very easy life in the uk compared to other cars you can get for the same price with similer levels of performance and usability anyone that says it doesnt is lieing.
 
Do you need experience in selling a supercar to be able to sell one and to be a success. Let's take Pagani and Koenigsegg for example, neither of thoes companies had any image or any history until recently now they are regarded in the uppser bracket of the supercar world. Why? Because thier cars were damn good that's why. There will always be badge snobs around, but badge snobs do not account for all sales. There is a big enough market for fast cars that arn't Lamboghini's, Porsches and Ferrari's to survive in if the cars are good.
 
Do you need experience in selling a supercar to be able to sell one and to be a success. Let's take Pagani and Koenigsegg for example, neither of thoes companies had any image or any history until recently now they are regarded in the uppser bracket of the supercar world. Why? Because thier cars were damn good that's why. There will always be badge snobs around, but badge snobs do not account for all sales. There is a big enough market for fast cars that arn't Lamboghini's, Porsches and Ferrari's to survive in if the cars are good.
pagani worked for Lamborghini for a long time and his car wasnt really noticed till they built the C12 S 7.3 L version(almost over 10 years since he brought out his first car) and we all know koenigsegg build the most reliable cars in the world and are in a great financial situation.
 
And if they were confident in selling more they would have brought over more wouldnt they? so why didnt they? (genuine question)
Because Nissan dropped the ball on the R34, they didn't start importing until late in the cars life. The 200 odd they brought in sold very well, but this was also the time that Nissan as a company globally was in deep trouble, the R34 UK imports were stopped to focus on the mass market and try and make some money. They then got bought by Renault and a lot of stuff was put on hold at Nissan (I was working for Renault at this time), the company (in the UK at least) basically stood still for about 2 years.

The R34 into the UK was a victim of many, many factors; almost none of them to do with the car itself. When Nissan stopped genuine imports the grey-market picked up quite nicely once again, you still see plenty of R32/R33/R34s around, just go to any Japanese car show in the UK or Rally Day at Castle Combe to see more than enough to show that for a car that only 200 were officially brought into the UK we have rather more than that in the country.



Never said they have had problem selling sportscars :confused: i was refering to to what they would class as a "supercar".i think i can safely say nissan doesnt have much experience in selling this kind of car after all this car has almost twice the power of a 350z,costs twice as much,goes twice as fast,does nearly 200mph.how many nissans have they tried to sell in the passed that does all those things?
Some of the end of life R34 specials were a good halfway point between these two points on the map and they certainly sold well enough.

However that isn't even a valid point, Audi had no experience of selling cars in this market place prior to the R8, the same is true (as Dave A points out) about any company starting out in this market place.

Noble has been mentioned, they managed to do it from scratch, with no chance of selling the car as a loss-leader (as Nissan may very well be doing - Ford certainly did with the GT).

Your argument could well be attached to any company at some point in history, it could have been applied to Ferrari back in the late 40's. "Bloody jumped up bloke Enzo, all he knows is racing what the hell is he doing selling a road car, the 166 will fail" or how about that well known tractor maker, the one Enzo dismissed in the same way you seem to be doing.

As I said, you may not take Nissan seriously in this endeavour or question the experience or ability to do this; I however would put good money on Porsche and Audi taking it very seriously.



So why on the R32.R33,R34 GTR's did they basicly take off the nissan badges and replace them with GTR ones 💡
You seem to be mistaking what owners did as opposed to the factory, R32/R33/R34's carried the Nissan badge on the boot, certainly every UK R34 was badged on the rear as a Nissan. My bad just realised that not all R32's were badged as Nissan on the rear.

thumb-nissan.skyline.ztune.r34.500.jpg



ive not said that i dislike this car,it might not have many rivals in japan or in america compared with cost,but in the UK where it costs almost twice as much it does have a huge job in front of it and im simply trying to highlight that it isnt going to have a very easy life in the uk compared to other cars you can get for the same price with similer levels of performance and usability anyone that says it doesnt is lieing.
Do you honestly think that Nissan as a global company has not/is not looking at competitively pricing the GT-R in each and every one of its market places. Price for bhp it will most certainly have rivals in each market place and if Nissan are doing the job right is will be priced accordingly.

It may not have an easy life in any market around the world, Japan may well be the 'easiest' (and I use that term relatively), but the US has plenty of domestic rivals and a huge cultural barrier to overcome in some ways.

This entirely depends on the price point and sales volumes that Nissan set themselves to reach, if they match or exceed them ths car will be a success regardless of what you or I think.

Personally I don't think its going to be a major problem for Nissan at all, the R34 in the UK was expensive in comparison to a lot of other cars and it had no problem selling at all. As long as Nissan are sane with the expected volumes I don't think this will be a major issue at all.


Regards

Scaff
 
Because Nissan dropped the ball on the R34, they didn't start importing until late in the cars life. The 200 odd they brought in sold very well, but this was also the time that Nissan as a company globally was in deep trouble, the R34 UK imports were stopped to focus on the mass market and try and make some money. They then got bought by Renault and a lot of stuff was put on hold at Nissan (I was working for Renault at this time), the company (in the UK at least) basically stood still for about 2 years.

ah ok

The R34 into the UK was a victim of many, many factors; almost none of them to do with the car itself. When Nissan stopped genuine imports the grey-market picked up quite nicely once again, you still see plenty of R32/R33/R34s around, just go to any Japanese car show in the UK or Rally Day at Castle Combe to see more than enough to show that for a car that only 200 were officially brought into the UK we have rather more than that in the country.
yes i have seen a fair amount of skylines at knockhill and indeed at castle combe (great track) but my point still has value,nissan expect to sell 2000 per year in the uk,you dont see 26,000 r32/33/34 GTR's in the uk do you? (taking the number of 2000 per year from the years the cars were in production)

However that isn't even a valid point, Audi had no experience of selling cars in this market place prior to the R8, the same is true (as Dave A points out) about any company starting out in this market place.
Audi own Lamborghini and bugatti,expertise from lamborghini were heavily used in the development of the R8.

Your argument could well be attached to any company at some point in history, it could have been applied to Ferrari back in the late 40's. "Bloody jumped up bloke Enzo, all he knows is racing what the hell is he doing selling a road car, the 166 will fail" or how about that well known tractor maker, the one Enzo dismissed in the same way you seem to be doing.

exactly how many supercar makers was there back then? exactly basicly none,nowadays there is a huge amount of rivals and ferrari had the racing background,again the GTR might have a racing background but not in europe nevermind the UK.

As I said, you may not take Nissan seriously in this endeavour or question the experience or ability to do this; I however would put good money on Porsche and Audi taking it very seriously.
i never said i dont take nissan seriously i am simply pointing out they seem to be making it out to be easier than it will be.

You seem to be mistaking what owners did as opposed to the factory, R32/R33/R34's carried the Nissan badge on the boot, certainly every UK R34 was badged on the rear as a Nissan.
yes it had A nissan badge on the rear but it was mainly covered in GT or GTR badges.Why not keep the nissan badge on the front if nissan were proud of the car?
 
And once again five minutes with google shows this to be unchecked speculation

Estimated Nissan GT-R UK Price - £55k
Source - http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/carreviews/firstdrives/213240/nissan_gtr.html


Estimated Audi RS6 UK Price - £75k
Source - http://www.carpages.co.uk/audi/audi-rs6-05-09-07.asp

Now I'm sorry but an estimate £20k price difference the GT-R is a long, long way from costing as much as an RS6.

You have had this pointed out to you a number of times in the last week, and this will I hope be the last time we have to do remind you.

DO NOT POST SPECULATION AS FACT


Scaff
If what I posted is speculation which it is then so have you. No one here knows how much the GTR will cost in the UK or how much the RS6 will cost. We have only rough ideas based on what we have read in the media or on forums.

Who is to say your sources are more accurate than mine. Plus car pages really is the last place I would trust info from. From what I have read on audi forums the RS6 will be 65-70k. Well within the range of the GTR, and the saloon RS6 will be possibly cheaper anyway.
 
pagani worked for Lamborghini for a long time and his car wasnt really noticed till they built the C12 S 7.3 L version(almost over 10 years since he brought out his first car) and we all know koenigsegg build the most reliable cars in the world and are in a great financial situation.
And, just because the guy who had the car built used to work for Laborghini, Pagani still was a new company with no history, no reputation and yet managed to become a huge success. And no, Pagani was getting a lot of converage before they started using the 7.3, but even that arrived pretty early on.

And your comment about Koenigsegg is moot, most supercars break down and wear fast compared to regualr road cars, but the issue here isn't if Koenigsegg is reliable or not, it's that it's regarded as one of the top supercars in the world, and not just by the press. Just because Nissan don't do Supercars in general does not mean that this car cannot, or will not succeed. In contrast to Pagani and Koenigsegg the GT-R already has a hell of a following worldwide, I see no reason this car will not sell well.
 
And, just because the guy who had the car built used to work for Laborghini, Pagani still was a new company with no history, no reputation and yet managed to become a huge success. And no, Pagani was getting a lot of converage before they started using the 7.3, but even that arrived pretty early on.

But they werent a huge success before the 7.3 came out and even now they arent exactly selling a huge amount are they.

And your comment about Koenigsegg is moot, most supercars break down and wear fast compared to regualr road cars, but the issue here isn't if Koenigsegg is reliable or not, it's that it's regarded as one of the top supercars in the world, and not just by the press. Just because Nissan don't do Supercars in general does not mean that this car cannot, or will not succeed. In contrast to Pagani and Koenigsegg the GT-R already has a hell of a following worldwide, I see no reason this car will not sell well.
why cant i question koenigsegg's reliable :confused: if i buy a car i dont want it to break down every 5 yards and it isnt exactly regarded as "one of the best" they havent even sold what 50-100 cars?and only recently started selling them in the us.if it came down to people and you asked them would you want a koenigsegg no doubt a fair amount would say yes but if you asked them if they would buy it with thier own money how many do you think would still say yes? again i didnt say this car will not or cant succeed i said that nissan would have a very hard job to achieve what they want to and again the company isnt totally financial stable.
 
If what I posted is speculation which it is then so have you. No one here knows how much the GTR will cost in the UK or how much the RS6 will cost. We have only rough ideas based on what we have read in the media or on forums.

Who is to say your sources are more accurate than mine. Plus car pages really is the last place I would trust info from. From what I have read on audi forums the RS6 will be 65-70k. Well within the range of the GTR, and the saloon RS6 will be possibly cheaper anyway.

You posted no sources or prices, you simply said that the two would be closely priced, I at least quoted sources for both, you don't like the one I gave for the RS6, have a few more....

http://www.carenthusiast.com/news.html?mode=article&id=2061
http://cars.lycos.co.uk/cars/coming-soon/detail.aspx?page=174
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/coming-soon/Detail.aspx?page=174

...are they all wrong?

Simply put we have been down the route of your 'sources' before and someone on the German car fan forum posting something is not a credible source.

It wasn't then and it still is not, nor are these your 'sources', a phrase than implies you have direct contacts within Audi, rather than simply rumour posted by an unverifiable person.

Simply put you were banned last time for this kind of behaviour and the staff here will not hesitate to do so again, and I assure you this time it will be permanent.


All current estimated prices for both cars (as I have now provided a wide range of sources that people can go and check themselves) clearly show a significant difference in price (£15k - £20k) between the RS6 and GT-R, which means two things.

1. Your statement that they are to be almost the same price is incorrect and can not be confirmed by estimated prices.

2. You brought the RS6 into the conversation for no good reason at all, even if they had been close in price (which they are not - based on sourced estimated prices), they are two cars aimed at totally different market segments. Which makes your post borderline spam, and I'm certainly not the only one to think so.

In the past you did a lot of damage to Audi fans for simply bringing them up in conversations for no good reason, unfortunately that still seems to be the case. Had you brought up the Audi R8 as an expensive competitor to the GT-R (as it also targets and often beats the 911) then I could see some validity.

Think before you post in future, and that's not a polite request, be assured your future membership does depend on it.


But they werent a huge success before the 7.3 came out and even now they arent exactly selling a huge amount are they.


why cant i question koenigsegg's reliable :confused: if i buy a car i dont want it to break down every 5 yards and it isnt exactly regarded as "one of the best" they havent even sold what 50-100 cars?and only recently started selling them in the us.if it came down to people and you asked them would you want a koenigsegg no doubt a fair amount would say yes but if you asked them if they would buy it with thier own money how many do you think would still say yes? again i didnt say this car will not or cant succeed i said that nissan would have a very hard job to achieve what they want to and again the company isnt totally financial stable.

Actually Nissan is quite healthy given the current state of most in the Automotive market place, with the 2006-2007 financial period being the only time in the last 8 or so years they didn't reach target.

Currently Nissan are the ones helping out Renault, rather a different situation to the one shortly after the merger/take over.
Source - http://www.nissan-global.com/EN/IR/LIBRARY/AR/

In regard to your earlier point about Ferrari having no real rivals when it launched the 166, quite untrue. Cars in the same class back in the day would have included models from Alfa 6C 2500 (1947), Masserati A6 (1947), MG TC (1945) and Aston Martin DB1 (1947/48).

Very few cars are launched with no direct competitors and while the GT-R may not have had any factory backed race experience in Europe, it has raced in Europe (ADAC 24hrs - the Nurburgring has seen many GT-Rs - the Falken one from GT4 included) and Nissan is well enough known for racing in Europe.


Regards

Scaff

Scaff
 
Back