2015 Dodge Charger ( 707HP Charger Hellcat - World's Most Powerful Sedan!)

  • Thread starter RocZX
  • 342 comments
  • 24,708 views
I don't see any mention of it on the web, so I can only assume that Dodge doesn't expect their crown-jewel engine to be doing any hard cornering. It's pretty indicative of their intentions for the car.

This is in addition to how far forward this iron-block boat anchor is mounted.

This is a 700hp supercharged engine without a dry-sump?
It looks Wet sump to me. Are you really shocked that Dodge isn't gearing a 4500lb 700hp sedan towards cornering?
 
It looks Wet sump to me. Are you really shocked that Dodge isn't gearing a 4500lb 700hp sedan towards cornering?

No, but if I'm dropping 60 grand on a 707hp car I expect to be able to throw some sticky rubber on it and actually be able to use that power on a track without turning the engine into a grenade.
 
The interior seems to be a love-hate ordeal. I hate it. I'm sitting in a car, not a toy. Those interior plastics looks like classic Dodge though.

The exterior isn't bad. I'm glad they managed to make the new Charger actually look good.
The interior looks awful thanks to those seats, imo. Black leather with red felt/alcantara(?) material on the inset looks tacky as hell.



As for the car, it's cool to brag about 707Hp in a sedan, but I stand by my comments before; Porsche (& Cadillac) has already come & conquered the performance sedan market.
 
"According to our lead SRT Engineer who drove it, he hit 206mph one direction 202.5mph the other so they average it" a quote from Ralph's twitter page from earlier today."

Posted on Allpar.com
 
There is no more Charger Super Bee, the Charger R/T Scat Pack is Official and is taking its place


http://www.allpar.com/news/index.php...2015-super-bee


Good Luck Chevy SS

Good thing it doesn't need luck and even with less power will probably out perform the new R/T so not sure what your point is, since the SS is still basically in it's on grouping.

Also looking at the interior some more I can see how people don't like it, the leather does seem to clash with the alacantra if that is what it is. I'd think two tone of the same material would have been better.
 
The SS is also available with 6mt and MRC. So those who want manual are pretty much stuck with the SS.
 
The hood scoop looks nice on the charger, but not the challenger, and it's probably due to being use to it before they updated them without it for the past couple years.
 
Strangely awesome how in the exhaust video above the Viper is the least powerful in that sandwich....
 
I hope they never give the Viper the Hellcat engine, at least not until they make the block out of aluminum like a proper high performance engine and dry sump it.
 
Why does block material matter if it's a high performance engine or not? Sure there are the obvious benefits like weight and all that, but then there's also strength that needs to be taken into consideration. I find that to be a load of crap, IMO.
 
What is the point of a high performance engine that's so heavy it slows you down? Even if you're only going in a straight line, that weight will matter. As for strength, aluminum Viper and Corvette engines have been surviving with up to 1000 HP for years. They used iron because it's cheap probably.
 
What is the point of a high performance engine that's so heavy it slows you down? Even if you're only going in a straight line, that weight will matter. As for strength, aluminum Viper and Corvette engines have been surviving with up to 1000 HP for years. They used iron because it's cheap probably.
The Ford Teskid Aluminum modular blocks have been surviving 1000+hp as well.
There is a cost factor Aluminum.
 
I dont think a Manual for the SS would hit that car... I mean... Dodge still sells more SRT Chargers than SS's... Chevy sold what? 240 SS's in July??
 
And the SS has also only been out less than a year. :rolleyes:

Edit* They were averaging 300/month March through May which is actually ok since that's when sales typically pick up after the new year. July being low is normal; summer months are when dealerships stop ordering inventory in wait for the next MY. August-September is when sales will slowly pick back up as dealers start working to make deals on older vehicles & by Oct-Dec., sales should back to where they were, probably even more now that the production has had a full year.

In comparison, Dodge sold 5539 Chargers, but you'll have to show proof that Dodge sold 250+ SRT8s of that to make such a bold claim.
 
Last edited:
2006 - 4,719
2007 - 5,868
2008 - 3,416
2009 - 945
2010 - 881

Total - 15,829
Those are SRT8 sales. That's less than 100/month over those last 2 years & I highly doubt it's risen anywhere near the others; sales dropped 2,400 the 3rd year & 2,400 the following....

You want to back up that claim that Dodge sells more SRT8 Chargers now?
 
I dont think a Manual for the SS would hit that car... I mean... Dodge still sells more SRT Chargers than SS's... Chevy sold what? 240 SS's in July??

I don't get how when your pet Mopars can't keep up with the competition in terms of performance or generally being a good car, you turn to sales as some form of quality metric.

I don't care how much of a car is sold each year. I care if it's a good car.

Edit: I have a theory. Are car sales like a team sport for you? Like instead of talking about World Series wins for the Yankees do you talk about the quarterly salesreports for Dodge in the mid-size sports sedan market?
 
Last edited:
Uh.... I RARELY Bring up Car sales as a Measuring stick. The only times i had talked about Sales of a car is to defend a car that people say ISNT Selling as expected... (Dart, Viper). you got me confused wiith someone else
 
Yes its less than a year since production but Oct would be the Year Mark. it sold only 2300 Units so so far lol

Because that's all they brought over really...you know let me just pause for a moment before I continue. I must say it's quite irritating when you try to create parallels or comparisons out of your rear or thin air to defend a brand that really couldn't give two craps if you existed, I mean really how much have you invested into Chrysler/Mopar? I'm a Corvette/GM guy most days and love Mopar too and there are others here with preference but we don't ever go to bat for these cars unless they actually do a great job, and if not then we call them out for it.

My point with all that, if you actually stepped away form the Chrysler headlines and read about the SS you'd know that it is a limited edition car for the U.S., that as I said in another thread is only to be given to dealerships that have sold other upper levels of GM cars (Corvette and Camaro). The car isn't to be sent here to compete against the mass numbers of others that are similar to it (though I don't know of any) and GM has said that the car has met it's sales.

Also that's before we even talk about the MT that people want and the Magnetic suspension in the ZR1/ZL1

http://www.autoblog.com/2014/04/26/...agnetic-ride-suspension-report/?icid=autoblog
http://www.autoblog.com/2013/09/06/chevy-to-limit-ss-sport-sedan-dealer-allocations/
http://www.kbb.com/car-news/all-the...t-ss-stopgap-or-jumping-off-point/2000010802/

Next time research before you just randomly compare.

Why does block material matter if it's a high performance engine or not? Sure there are the obvious benefits like weight and all that, but then there's also strength that needs to be taken into consideration. I find that to be a load of crap, IMO.

If it's truely a high performance engine then a lighter and just as durable block with other great metallurgical properties over iron would bet better. The aluminum blocks of today and several years now are quite strong and on equal grounds to Iron, this old world thinking of the 70s and 80s and even early 90s that "real men use Iron blocks" isn't correct and just shows how little people tend to know. (not say you Slash just in general since this idea is still perpetuated)
 
Last edited:
I must say it's quite irritating when you try to create parallels or comparisons out of you rear or thin air to defend a brand that really couldn't give two craps if you existed, I mean really how much ave you invested into Chrysler/Mopar? I'm a Corvette/GM guy most days and love Mopar too and there are others here with preference but we don't ever go to bat for these cars unless they actually do a great job, and if not then we call them out for it.

This.

I am mainly a Mopar/Nismo guy but I'm not afraid to call out things that I think need to change. Brand loyalty and blind defense is very stupid to me. I like the designs of much of the current Dodges out there but the underpinnings just aren't comparable to their competition in some vehicles (Challenger I'm looking at you). A few Nissans are currently very bland in my eyes. I accept it, shake my head a few times, make a few criticisms and move on. Just because you like something doesn't mean you need to defend it to the edge of the earth.

The way you talk is like you are near the head of the company. I know dealers that pedal less blind optimism and they profit from talking up their product. I'll never understand how you (@psntomaz) and people like you can swear on a brand as it has little to no faults even in the face of many facts. (Not just in this thread). You are not alone though I know a few Ford and GM diehards too.
 
Uh.... I RARELY Bring up Car sales as a Measuring stick. The only times i had talked about Sales of a car is to defend a car that people say ISNT Selling as expected... (Dart, Viper). you got me confused wiith someone else

Is this a joke? Sales were literally the first thing you brought up when people mentioned the Chevy SS on this very page. Nobody said anything about sales except you. Do you think I'm blind or do you just not remember all the way back to half a page up?

2/10 at best.
 
Last edited:
Back