Both me and Agro are impartial and unbiased in this matter, as we where not near you guys, and you're both part of our team, why do you think we came to the same conclution?
And, if anything, I would favour you, and you know why.
It's not about favouritism, it's about fairness.
Evo rightfully got a time penalty - so should IP.
I got a grid penalty for Lap 1 and Lap 33 - one which was definitely not my fault (and UA should have got a penalty for it, unbelievable) and the first a racing incident at the most, given other incidents were called race incidents.
I saw a few bad things but no warnings, no penalties for those drivers and I barely looked at many laps.
If this stewarding is going to be who cried the loudest, or who's who's buddy, etc it is farcical.
I never even got a chance to challenge Lap 33 decision. I didn't even think about reporting UA for ignoring blue flags or for blocking me but clearly he plays by a nastier set of rules.
And the decision was to penalise me for that, I mean how? How can I avoid a car which suddenly brakes way too much in a corner. Who also was a backmarker and had ample space and time to let me pass. And because I didn't stop my car and swear in the room at another driver thus loosing time like UA did, a time penalty wasn't given, but a grid penalty - which benefits UA, who should have got a penalty.
And UA is a steward that is meant to review the other steward, he clearly hasn't reviewed the footage properly because lap 2 would at least be a warning or a penalty, or maybe he has, and it stinks.
Hoping for a clean race and a clean aftermath at Fuji.