- 33,155
- Hammerhead Garage
Most drivers pay these days.That being $18 million or there abouts?
The point is that while Palmer is GP2 champion, it took him a long time to get there in a sport where the best talent tends to show itself very quickly.
Most drivers pay these days.That being $18 million or there abouts?
Basically, Vandoorne coming 2nd was a higher rated performance since he did that on his rookie season, and effectively dominated the 2nd half of the season.Most drivers pay these days.
The point is that while Palmer is GP2 champion, it took him a long time to get there in a sport where the best talent tends to show itself very quickly.
Indeed, Sainz showed "instant performance" in GP3... oh wait, he floundered.Also Sainz won F3.5 on his first Full season of the series.
Instant performance is the clear definer of Talent that teams look for.
That is true, however the cars change from series to series and the fact he struggled in GP3 doesn't mean much when he performed instantly in the vastly more powerful F3.5 car.Indeed, Sainz showed "instant performance" in GP3... oh wait, he floundered.
Must be average then.
He beat a few decent but unexceptional big-car rookies, journeymen and a DTM-reject to the title in the lead DAMS. For me, it wasn't the most convincing of titles.That is true, however the cars change from series to series and the fact he struggled in GP3 doesn't mean much when he performed instantly in the vastly more powerful F3.5 car.
He is lucky to be given the chance to get to F3.5 but the objective was clear at that point win or your out, and he did.
That's one way to put it. Or you could say that Nasr was a title protagonist in both his second season and third season in GP2. There was no shame in losing out to talented and experienced veterans like Bird and Leimer. By comparison, his third season was perhaps underwhelming, even though he won races for the first time.Compare that to say Nasr who had a more impressive early career but then slowed down once he hit GP2, in his first season he came 10th(at this point he was the same age as Sainz is now) and then after 2 more seasons got a 3rd in the championship.
Doesn't seem to apply to Nasr really, as he dominated Frijns and Juncadella in his first year of cars (Formula BMW) and then beat teammate Kevin Magnussen to the British F3 title.The level of competition enviably gets higher as they step up the ladder and if they struggle on the way to the top then domainate once they get there is a stronger sign of potential and talent then, dominating your way to the top to only go medicore.
Many drivers beat other drivers early in their careers only to end up worse then them when they get to their peak performance(Ricciardo lost to Alshin in F3.5 says alot about that).He beat a few decent but unexceptional big-car rookies, journeymen and a DTM-reject to the title in the lead DAMS. For me, it wasn't the most convincing of titles.
That's one way to put it. Or you could say that Nasr was a title protagonist in both his second season and third season in GP2. There was no shame in losing out to talented and experienced veterans like Bird and Leimer. By comparison, his third season was perhaps underwhelming, even though he won races for the first time.
Doesn't seem to apply to Nasr really, as he dominated Frijns and Juncadella in his first year of cars (Formula BMW) and then beat teammate Kevin Magnussen to the British F3 title.
We're gonna make it out of Q1! We're gonna make it out of Q1! We're gonna... awwwwwwwww.Oh Mclaren
Oh that was close , good reply from Nico to a great Lewis lap, Kimi will not be happy.
Agreed, he has been faster than Bottas today in general @LMSCorvetteGT2 . Mercs got this in the bag for tomorrow now I guess.
Considering the track was getting faster I think Hamilton could of improved on his best lap as well..9+ over the field. Safe to say we'll all be watching mid -field cars racing tomorrow.
.9+ over the field. Safe to say we'll all be watching mid -field cars racing tomorrow.
Most drivers pay these days.
The point is that while Palmer is GP2 champion, it took him a long time to get there in a sport where the best talent tends to show itself very quickly.
Kind of depends, usually those that are considered bad before flourishing had have titles won in lower formula just had a rough last stage.Different drivers develop differently. Some excel in lower formula and flop in F1, other drivers don't do much in lower formula and flourish in F1.
Yeah that second nearly is quite scary but the issues Lewis is having are just as worrying. And Rosberg is the one with a target on his back.
Kind of depends, usually those that are considered bad before flourishing had have titles won in lower formula just had a rough last stage.
Kobayashi for example had a Rubbish GP2 compaign for two seasons, but had done exceptional in F2.0 and GP2 Asia, although I wouldn't say he is top talent he defintely was at an F1 journeymen level atleast.
But all Top drivers(Such as Hamilton, Alonso, Vettel, Ricciardo etc)currently in F1 have atleast done exceptional in Lower formula or showed Potential at a really early stage to warrant promotion.
Can't and don't agree with this, from everything seen soo far, Hamilton is more skilled then Rosberg.I agree. And thing is, Nico is even in skill with Lewis. It's not like Schumacher/Irvine or Hakinnen/Coulthard. This is like Hill/Villenueve. Glad I'm not too fussed about it. I'm happy in my corner with Honda for the moment.
Given he has Outperformed 1 of them at the peak of their powers for an entire season basically I think it will prove in the long run that Ricciardo is with these guys.I'd say Ricciardo has it the toughest. The other three are multiple championship winners. He proved his worth in two underperforming cars with little experience. While I'm educating myself on these newer drivers, it's tough for me to judge them based on this new equipment. If they can stay on the circuit and bring the car home, good on 'em.
Can't and don't agree with this, from everything seen soo far, Hamilton is more skilled then Rosberg.