- 12,513
- Ireland
- The__Luke
Probably thinking of how the city of Liverpool refuses to sell that rag.Good move, honestly thought they did this years ago...
To be honest I don't see that much difference between this, Wikipedia banning the Daily Mail from being used as a source, and Donald Trump declaring CNN to be 'fake news'.
To be honest I don't see that much difference between this, Wikipedia banning the Daily Mail from being used as a source, and Donald Trump declaring CNN to be 'fake news'.
I disagree. There's a huge difference between people not buying or endorsing them due to what they think about their conduct or contents and organisations banning them. Okay, so Liverpool is a private body and is entitled to give free admission to whomever it wishes (though you'd think they'd have banned Sun reporters a mite sooner than this; perhaps Trump has emboldened them), but the message this sends over is 'it's okay when it's a news outlet we don't like, but not okay when it's a person we don't like doing the banning'. Imagine if Manchester United had banned the BBC... oh, wait.Principally yes, they're all taking newspapers/media outlets and not endorsing them any more. Good, that's how you should treat rags and hacks who are dishonest. Don't like? Don't buy.
I disagree. There's a huge difference between people not buying or endorsing them due to what they think about their conduct or contents and organisations banning them. Okay, so Liverpool is a private body and is entitled to give free admission to whomever it wishes (though you'd think they'd have banned Sun reporters a mite sooner than this; perhaps Trump has emboldened them), but the message this sends over is 'it's okay when it's a news outlet we don't like, but not okay when it's a person we don't like doing the banning'. Imagine if Manchester United had banned the BBC... oh, wait.
If you think the Sun was terrible with access to the source material, how much better do you think it will be without access to the source material and a grudge?
There's not very many steps between these kind of actions and the loss of free press. Banning accredited journalists never ends well, for anyone...
Yes, and for exactly the same reasons.Wouldn't it tax the definition of a free press if a private entity was ordered to allow a newspaper onto its premises?
Just as it is Wikipedia's - and Trump's - but they are all essentially saying 'this is a publication we don't like because it doesn't report what we say are the right facts'.But it's their decision to make.
Joel Veltman. What an absolute 🤬
Watch 16th century Calcio ( Calcio Storico ) instead then, you wont see any fairys there.Modern day football! One of the many reasons I've stopped watching that awful ****.
He did apologize for his ****** behaviour though.
If Clattenburg referees a match in Saudi Arabia, makes a mistake and ends up robbing a team of 3 points, will he have his hand cut off?
fined £35k