- 20,681
- TenEightyOne
- TenEightyOne
Horner says that signing a Renault deal for 2017 is now "a formality". What a difference a year makes
Horner needs to chill & wait until the results start showing a trend. He's drunk on Dan's Pole at the moment & clearly isn't thinking before putting his mouth in gear.Horner says that signing a Renault deal for 2017 is now "a formality". What a difference a year makes
Horner needs to chill & wait until the results start showing a trend. He's drunk on Dan's Pole at the moment & clearly isn't thinking before putting his mouth in gear.
Well, I imagine the guy at RB that's most frustrated of all would be Newey. He went through more of this later in the year last season & still managed to produce the RB12. It's not a bad piece of kit either.He doesn't have much time; two months from now would be too late to start designing around a different engine.
Renault have blown very few lumps up this year and they're clearly way ahead of last year's pace; do you see it as likely that RB would want to change?
Worst. NWA tribute band. Ever.So much love on this pic
Anything from the artist that is Giorgio Piola gets my attention.http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/125276
^New suspension upgrades at silverstone test
Williams upgrades, http://www.formula1.com/en/latest/technical/2016/7/tech-insight---williams-silverstone-aero.html
http://www.formula1.com/en/latest/technical/2016/7/tech-insight---austria-updates.html
Wasn't used in Austria but did turn up again in testing, the idea is to create efficient air flow in the rear, at a cheaper cost than top teams.
http://www.formula1.com/en/latest/t...ht---mercedes-add-strength-to-suspension.html
Restrengthened rear suspension to survive the bumps
http://www.formula1.com/en/latest/technical/2016/7/tech-insight---ferraris-silverstone-updates.html
Further aero work done from austria and carried over to the testing at Silverstone.
Also more on that double rear wing Williams has been messing with during in season tests, and believe it could be legal for 2017.
http://www.crash.net/f1/news/232099/1/double-rear-wing-boosts-corner-grip-bottas.html
It isn't, testing purposes only. Presumably it is the easiest way to simulate the extra aerodynamics and tyre grip expected in 2017.
Anything from the artist that is Giorgio Piola gets my attention.
As for that Williams double rear wing, I hope it isn't legal next year. It's absolutely hideous
No one asked the team to have that much setting available to drivers. It was asked to team to provide a hybrid system, they decide it was better to build a rather complicate system with lots of mode so they can tweak the car according to lots of stuff and because back then they could tell whatever they wanted to drivers. Now they have to adapt and probably will make them a bit simplier or simply teach their drivers how to resolve the most common trouble.
Hybrid systems are complicated to begin with, in fact I'd say these systems are probably more simple than those used in LMP1-H. The system and controls for the most part are not having anything to do with the hybrid. They can't make them simpler, if they could they'd have done it already. Hell the systems have been complicated for about 20 years now...so, also common trouble is what exactly?
I do think that they could have done simpler engine management but like I said complicate mode let them tweak the car more get more out of the engine and recuperation mode and back then they had the right to tell everything. But if you have some inside information or are a hybrid engine engineer, I'll gladly bow to your feet and apologize to you.
As for the comon trouble I'm not a race engineer and I have no idea what are the trouble that comes the most but I do believe there's some and that driver could learn a bit more about how the hybrid system work and what possibility they have with the wheel.
But this is entirely speculation country I admit.
Why would I need to be, yeah I do engineering, but I wasn't aware that there was a specialized class of engineers that work on solely hybrid ICU. I've got knowledge on ICUs in general which I why I can say what I have, any time you build a system that is meant to not only be fuel efficient at the capacity it's done in and the power being pulled without the electronic of hybrid it's going to be much more difficult than a small capacity V8 that doesn't adhere to such restrictions. And said V8 was already quite difficult.
I think a better question to ask is how exactly you expect a simpler engine management to come about?
If my comment suggest such thing then it wasnt my point, but I assumed there was recurrent problem that we dont know about. I wasnt aware they fixed some issue themselves my bad and when it's more serious they have to go trough the pitlane, where's the problem in that ?Yet your comments suggest that there is such a thing, and that clearly it must be black and white simple fixing, drivers do know the systems, as seen this season off the top of my head, Kimi, Lewis and Nico have all had to fix in car setting that went a miss because of team error without having team help. Nico has had to do it on a few more occasions than Lewis, and Kimi fixed his issue supposedly during the Baku gp where it happened.
Well by making simpler mode, I have not much idea on how they work but surely they didnt need to have system that complicate, couldnt they make a high power mode, a race mode, a recovery mode, a reset mode, a rain mode etc.. ?
If my comment suggest such thing then it wasnt my point, but I assumed there was recurrent problem that we dont know about. I wasnt aware they fixed some issue themselves my bad and when it's more serious they have to go trough the pitlane, where's the problem in that ?
I know you want engineer to tell them during the race but I'm against it, if your car have some sort of trouble, pit him, make it safe again and let it race again. We're back at square one yeah \o/
From me obviously.
So you're against most if not all forms of racing? There is nothing unsafe about a car on the race track that isn't close to failure or that can be fixed remotely. If the cars is facing acute failure then sure get the car off the track. My issue for the last time is, people okay with the FIA saying all problems are of equal measure is a problem
Sorry I guess my brain have trouble because I can't understand your argument. Mine is simple, if the car have any sort of trouble, simple or very complicate, put it in pitlane or into the pit if needed then sort it out and let the car run again. I dont see why it's such a problem for you.
It has nothing to do with racing. If others series have it and are successful then so be it, there's series with abs and tcs (maybe ?) and other aids and I wouldnt mind watching them as I dont mind watching tuned car run around tsukuba but I want f1 to be a driver sports where drivers do the job and not engineer. If the drivers can't do it then pit and let engineer sort it out. That's my argument.
I'm not sure why you're starting to insult me, we have two different view in the sports and both are valid. Neither of us is a part of f1 management so it's all about opinion. And I don't think your opinion is more valid than mine because Samus agreed to yours.
I never said well it's racing so driver are responsible, please don't quote stuff I never said or interpret what I said.
James Allison out at Ferrari. http://www.skysports.com/f1/news/12433/10513956/james-allison-leaves-ferrari
I'd be very happy to see James Key end up at Ferrari. He lead the design for some of the best midfield cars in recent years at Toro Rosso and Sauber, given the resources he could bring Ferrari back to the top step of the podium. The perfect replacement for James Allison, who is also an extremely talented person and I hope he's still in the F1 paddock for years to come.
First (but by no means final) glimpse of what the 2017 cars might look like:
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/125581/vettel-offers-glimpse-of-f1-2017-in-test
Vettel running an SF-15T with some 2017 parts.