- 22,551
- Arizona
- HamiltonMP427
What idiot at Coke signed that deal?
How are they idiots, these deals are to get exposure on a global level and considering the rate the car shows up on screen good or bad, that's always good for Coca Cola.
What idiot at Coke signed that deal?
I would so love to see a livery based on Coca Cola as the major sponsor.
It’s got potential......if it’s a title sponsorship.Yeah totally agree, can't stand the product but as a livery reckon it would look the goods.
Ferrari update is pretty big aero wise
You'd think that Fanta would go better with McLaren.I imagine if they sponsor the undertray, a nice big Coca Cola logo would look good as the car is hoisted on television during a yellow flag session.
-
I would so love to see a livery based on Coca Cola as the major sponsor.
You'd think that Fanta would go better with McLaren.
I don't know, Coke are the producers of Zero, a significant statistic for McLaren in recent years
Hmmm..the bizarre Rich Energy front comes back into play.
It's just another energy drink company
I'm with you. I smell a rat.Are they? One would think that if they have enough cash to sponsor an F1 team there would at least be some evidence of them actually existing that isn't published by them. Seriously, google image search "Rich Energy Can", I can't find a single image that wasn't originally posted by them. Their is also no evidence to suggest their "partnerships" are real things. Surely something as big as becoming the exclusive energy drink of 2 major hotels would generate an article or two besides the one they published?
The whole thing seems very odd and sketchy.
Are they? One would think that if they have enough cash to sponsor an F1 team there would at least be some evidence of them actually existing that isn't published by them. Seriously, google image search "Rich Energy Can", I can't find a single image that wasn't originally posted by them. Their is also no evidence to suggest their "partnerships" are real things. Surely something as big as becoming the exclusive energy drink of 2 major hotels would generate an article or two besides the one they published?
The whole thing seems very odd and sketchy.
I read the "Testimonials", they're telling people to supply it in their stores...
Up until 2016 I went from working in pubs, classy nightclubs to student nightclubs, and also a lap dance club - none of which sold this drink or ever had the option to order it.
I'm in retail at the moment, have worked for 4 different major retailers the past two years whilst moving about, I saw/still see every product coming in because it's me who puts it on the system - this drink has never been listed in any of the retailers I've worked at. Nor can we order it.
On the subject of the "testimonials" someone on Reddit did some digging when they were trying to buy Force India and the only one that checked out was the sponsorship one.
Does their pricing seem normal? I obviously have no clue what energy drinks go for across the pond, but I'd imagine most sell for more than the £.83 they are asking.
I mean, if they have money they have money.Monster usually goes for £0.90 to £1.50 - Ultra and Absolute Zero usually get pinned at the £1.00 mark and this is the general rule for all of the more popular drinks.
Red Bull will set you back about £1.50 for a slim can, but all of the no-name drinks such as Boost go for the same price as a can of Rich.
I would therefore come to the conclusion that Rich might be awful. I also dislike that they only sell to consumers and only on their website.
All-in-all, Haas has got some funny dealings ahead.
In the event that they have money, it's all fine. However, their use of the market at large seems incredibly suspect to me. In my opinion, the side of a Haas machine is infinitely less valuable a place to put your logo than the shelves of Sainsbury's.I mean, if they have money they have money.
Haas, like most businesses that need large amounts of money don’t worry about who’s offering it or where it’s coming from.
Like I said before in this thread, Rich Energy seems more like a money laundering front, rather than an actual drinks company.In the event that they have money, it's all fine. However, their use of the market at large seems incredibly suspect to me. In my opinion, the side of a Haas machine is infinitely less valuable a place to put your logo than the shelves of Sainsbury's.
Case in point - I was still buying loads of Monster before they started sponsoring Mercedes, purely because they had the sense to sell their drinks in shops.
Like I said before in this thread, Rich Energy seems more like a money laundering front, rather than an actual drinks company.