All of those have been released as new vehicles in the last five years or so. The G-class is essentially just a continually developed version of the car it was decades ago.And the current one is not massively outdated if you compare it to current mid size trucks (Ranger/Amarok/Hillux).
Heritage, beyond the badge on the nose, means diddly-squat to the sort of people who'll buy the X-class. Most of them will probably not even know the G-class exists.Unlike the G-Class it doesn't have any heritage to rely on either.
Really? You think it'd be cheaper to comprehensively redevelop a car that's massively out of date than to restyle what's essentially an existing Nissan pickup?I'm sure it would be cheaper to remodel the G-Class from the bottom than investing into this project.
Trust me, the G-class really isn't a good car, by virtually any metric by which things are judged. It rides and handles terribly, it's massive, thirsty, noisy, vulgar, poorly packaged, steers worse than any other car I've ever driven, and feels like a product of a different era. It was designed as a working vehicle, rather than a passenger vehicle, and it doesn't hide it very well. And it is not special, unless you mean "special needs".I'm sure the G-Class would appeal to wide range of customers if only MB would decide to fix the price range and fit in some weaker engines for casual buyers. The cheapest new G-Class in Croatia costs around €130k, for crying out loud!
It is a shame, the G-Class could really be what it's supposed to be. The X-Class wouldn't be necessary then.
There is no meaning in keeping the G-Class if profit-draining is the only purpose it has to fulfil. I would rather shut down the entire class than continue ripping off customers like that.
What else needs to be changed apart from steering and suspension? From my perspective, they just need to make it more friendlier to drive, everything else somehow fits the car given the class it belongs to. They could have done it by now, taking step by step each year/model update, thus reducing what potentially seems to be huge investment.Really? You think it'd be cheaper to comprehensively redevelop a car that's massively out of date than to restyle what's essentially an existing Nissan pickup?
I do agree with all that, it is just shame they have to rely on this cooperation when they could have used their own car to achieve the same purpose.Trust me, the G-class really isn't a good car, by virtually any metric by which things are judged. It rides and handles terribly, it's massive, thirsty, noisy, vulgar, poorly packaged, steers worse than any other car I've ever driven, and feels like a product of a different era. It was designed as a working vehicle, rather than a passenger vehicle, and it doesn't hide it very well. And it is not special, unless you mean "special needs".
I knew you're were going to say that. Kudos to planners, but I couldn't do it.And I bet Mercedes product planners are less concerned about how they are "ripping off" people who view the G Class as a car to aspire to and are happy to pay the absurd prices to get it.
You've literally just said you agreed with my list of all the things that are wrong with it...What else needs to be changed apart from steering and suspension?
It's inherently an old platform and no longer meets the basic standards required of a modern car - it'd be a far more involved job than simply bunging some new suspension on it. If that were the case then Land Rover would have a much, much easier job to replace the Defender - but that was supposed to happen years ago and they still haven't figured out a way of doing it suitably yet.From my perspective, they just need to make it more friendlier to drive, everything else somehow fits the car given the class it belongs to. They could have done it by now, taking step by step each year/model update, thus reducing what potentially seems to be huge investment.
The groups identified as being key to the Australian market include “families with an active lifestyle and an affinity to premium products” and “successful adventurers, who live in an urban environment”, and “business owners … who want to use their pick-up for commercial and private purposes”.
The other two groups not identified as being relevant to Australia include “trend-conscious individualists with an affinity to premium products” and landowners.
Head of Mercedes-Benz Vans Volker Mornhinweg said the X-Class will appeal to buyers that may not have previously considered purchasing a pick-up.
“We will open up and change the segment of mid-size pick-ups – with the world’s first true premium pick-up for the modern urban lifestyle,” he said. “Our future X-Class will be a pick-up that knows no compromise. Ladder-type frame, high-torque six-cylinder engine, and permanent all-wheel drive are compulsory for us.
“As an added value we bring safety, comfort, agility, and expressive design – in other words, everything that distinguishes vehicles bearing the Mercedes star. We will thus appeal to new customers who have not considered owning a pick-up before.”
Trust me, the G-class really isn't a good car, by virtually any metric by which things are judged. It rides and handles terribly, it's massive, thirsty, noisy, vulgar, poorly packaged, steers worse than any other car I've ever driven, and feels like a product of a different era.
I thought I did before I drove one. Then I realised I have limits to how much "character" I can accept in a modern car...And I still very much want one.
Can't believe people are citing Lincoln as a reason why Mercedes might fail. Chopping the back off a Navigator still makes it a Lincoln.
interior wise it looks completely Mercedes though and if that's the case, that's basically job done in that regard.It's because the Lincoln Blackwood was a truck by a luxury auto marker. If you'd like you could also consider the sales failure that was the Cadillac Escalade EXT. The market for trucks from luxury manufacturers, at least in the US, is almost non existent.
Plus Mercedes isn't doing anything vastly different than what Ford did, it's just instead of sticking some badges and bodywork on an F-150, MB is sticking badges and body work on a Nissan pickup.
Could it be successful in Europe? I have no idea what the market is like over there but I can't imagine pick ups are hot commodities.
You can get the new Navara with coil spring rear suspension.If it's using leaf springs like the Nissan it's not really Luxury. Leaf springs are basically the exact opposite of the word.
Navara suspension update
You can get the new Navara with coil spring rear suspension.
interior wise it looks completely Mercedes though and if that's the case, that's basically job done in that regard.
If it's using leaf springs like the Nissan it's not really Luxury. Leaf springs are basically the exact opposite of the word.
The Amarok gave businesses another Ute option. The X-Class is just another option. people will buy it just because.
That's their intention to sell it to places other than the USA. VW is a premium brand here. Just as Subaru has moved up scale. Here.If it's not using leaf springs it's even more useless than I thought it would be and would show that MB is simply trying to market it as a car with a bed for people that occasionally need to buy one bag of mulch. I see R1600 pointed out you can get the Navara with coils, so I'm guessing MB will use that.
The Amarok is not being built by a luxury/upscale brand though and can be bought it a really cheap commercial spec. And really wouldn't people just buy the Nissan if they were buying it for a business? They are going to want the least expensive option with the most utility.
It happened here in the states with the Mercedes Sprinter, companies just opted for the cheaper Dodge Ram Van because it was more or less the exact same vehicle with a few odds and ends that were different.
So, more power to MB going for it, I just think if they attempt to sell it in the states it will be a flop. Elsewhere in the world it might have more success.
No, and Hell no.That's their intention to sell it to places other than the USA. VW is a premium brand here. Just as Subaru has moved up scale. Here.
Well, someone needs to tell the dealer principles at the VW and Subaru dealerships I worked. As well as the customers that buy them.No, and Hell no.
VWs sell cheaper then Mazdas these days and Subaru sells plastic garbage, hardly premium.
All of those have been released as new vehicles in the last five years or so. The G-class is essentially just a continually developed version of the car it was decades ago.
You've not read between your own lines: There is middle ground between a work horse and a car to show off in. That is exactly where the X-class will sit.Thats why they are replacing it with a new model soon. I would have preferred for Merc to rather develop an truck on that platform! Its not like I can afford it, but if I could I won`t waste that much money on a rebadged Nissan/Renault. As a work horse I will rather buy the Nissan (or Ranger), to show off a GLE Coupe will do the job better.
Maybe off topic, but the G Class is not as terrible as you imply
You've not read between your own lines: There is middle ground between a work horse and a car to show off in. That is exactly where the X-class will sit.
In which currency is it 70k? The Nissan on which this Merc is based is £22k in the UK - even supposing there's some absolutely horrific Mercedes markup, I'd be surprised if it's more than say, £40k.A 70K+ car as a work horse? Hehe... I can`t imagine it having success in europe. In South America/Africa? Will potential customers prefer a Nissan based truck to a similar priced Merc SUV?
Mid Size trucks are terrible too if you compare them to modern SUVs. Terrible Engines, Terrible seats, terrible ride. We are talking about commercial vehicles, not family SUVs. You`re not comparing a Ranger to a Kuga, right?
I repeat myself: I am talking about a Merc truck based on the upcoming G Wagon successor, not on the old one. I would rather see that one coming to life