2017 F1 Pre SeasonFormula 1 

  • Thread starter RX-7_FD3S
  • 386 comments
  • 22,226 views
I wonder if McLaren has CAD designs drawn up for their car to fit other engine options...

Under Ron Dennis I'm sure they would have - in the event of Honda getting close to breaking any performance clauses it's the kind of thing he'd wave around in a meeting. At exactly 21C.

They have already said that they aren't looking at breaking the contract.

Of course they have. Do you believe them?
 
Buy the freins, put them on, deal with the legal fallout.
i'm guessing F1 contract are not that simple to break and would involve lots of money if done so. And Haas being in America probably doesnt help things (because of how laws works over there).
 
i'm guessing F1 contract are not that simple to break and would involve lots of money if done so. And Haas being in America probably doesnt help things (because of how laws works over there).
If the brakes are so bad that it's a safety issue, they should be able to get out of it easily enough.
 
Just pull out Honda, you are wasting your time and your money.

It was reckless to enter a 10-year deal (as has been said in this thread) with a supplier who hadn't built this type of engine before. Reckless.

It smacks of marketing MuckLarun-Honda ZOMG!!!11!1! SeNNa!!2! instead of entering with a supplier you actually believe can and will deliver.
 
It smacks of marketing MuckLarun-Honda ZOMG!!!11!1! SeNNa!!2! instead of entering with a supplier you actually believe can and will deliver.

Absolutely... but it was most likely backed up with proper thought and due diligence. Honda clearly assured McLaren that they could build a competitive F1 engine and return to the days of when they could win stuff (ignoring the days when they shut teams, lost stuff or melted down).

The contract built on that conversation needs a sensible length and proper performance clauses that each side has clearly understood.

It was reckless to enter a 10-year deal (as has been said in this thread) with a supplier who hadn't built this type of engine before. Reckless.

Yup :)
 
I still won't put any weight on these times. We'll see about the pecking order in Melbourne. :)
 
Mercedes using the same strategy as in the past making Ferrari look like the team to beat. On the other side, Ferrari looks really good this year and as a lifetime Ferrari fan, there is always that hope that they really are that strong again. Can't wait for Melbourne...
 
Mercedes using the same strategy as in the past making Ferrari look like the team to beat. On the other side, Ferrari looks really good this year and as a lifetime Ferrari fan, there is always that hope that they really are that strong again. Can't wait for Melbourne...

With the regulation changes for 2017 there is a limit to how much Mercedes can sandbag their performance. I think they'll want to know the performance potential of the package.
 
Trust me on this, every time we have seen so far is not close to what we will see from these cars, Autosport has picked up on erratic lifting on all the top teams when doing fast times, so my guess is they haven't shown it all yet.

Edit: Mclaren has caused another Red flag.
 
With the regulation changes for 2017 there is a limit to how much Mercedes can sandbag their performance. I think they'll want to know the performance potential of the package.

Sure, but that is possible without seeing it on the timing board. Just like Vettel did his 1:19,3 on Supersofts just now while coming pretty slow out of last corner and not pushing it at all until the timing line.
I remember a few years ago, Ferrari did their own timing sectors, e.g. Last part of sector 1 + First part of sector 2 = Ferrari sector 1. They pushed only for that part and Ferrari could assemble their own sectors to see the true speed. For the public it looked like a normal lap because they did slow down for the rest of the lap.

As mustafur just said, we won't see the true pace until Melbourne. We can only assume who did a good or a bad job. And for that, both Mercedes and Ferrari engines look pretty bulletproof in the settings they have tried so far.
 
With the regulation changes for 2017 there is a limit to how much Mercedes can sandbag their performance. I think they'll want to know the performance potential of the package.
Timing doesnt mean anything in term of who's fastest until FP3 at Melbourne really and even then, some teams will probably hide their pace still. Mercedes is knowned to have a qualification mode on engine that no one else have at least with a mercedes engine and they never use it before qualification.
 
Good thinking by McLaren, they've extended their corporate Orange makeover to the breakdown trucks.

McLaren.png
 
How does a car company with so much money do so poorly with reliability or whatever the problem is? The same can be asked with Ferrari and their performance in 2014.
 
How does a car company with so much money do so poorly with reliability or whatever the problem is? The same can be asked with Ferrari and their performance in 2014.
There's a fundamental, inescapable truth at the heart of engineering problem: the move moving parts a thing has, the more there is that can go wrong with it.
 
Never been a better time to post this.

AF5UT6.jpg


In all seriousness though, here's to hoping this is more like 2014 testing where the Renault engines kept dying and people thought Red Bull were screwed, then they won 3 races. It's Honda, though.
 
Last edited:
It's been a while, but did Toyota ever accomplish anything in their last attempt at F1? I remember they had a pretty phenomenal budget and just didn't get anything done - so it's not surprising to see Honda choking at this point.
 
so it's not surprising to see Honda choking at this point.
... Because they're secretly the same company and all those non-descript Japanese businessmen are really just a front for the Illuminati/the deep state/SPECTRE/the Democrats?
 
It was reckless to enter a 10-year deal (as has been said in this thread) with a supplier who hadn't built this type of engine before. Reckless.

It smacks of marketing MuckLarun-Honda ZOMG!!!11!1! SeNNa!!2! instead of entering with a supplier you actually believe can and will deliver.
Initially I saw it as nothing more than a hapless attempt to rekindle what used to be a powerful force in F1.
 
That lap Bottas did on the supersofts, looked pretty much within himself and the car.
I'm sure there is quite a bit left in the bag. But that goes for all of them really.

Barcelona's temps will be very different to Melbourne's. Looks like about 10 deg hotter.
Which may change the difference between the closely matched times that the ultras/supers and softs are producing.
https://www.timeanddate.com/weather/australia/melbourne/ext
 
In all seriousness though, here's to hoping this is more like 2014 testing where the Renault engines kept dying and people thought Red Bull were screwed, then they won 3 races. It's Honda, though.

Red Bull were a front-running team for the preceding seasons though. McLaren... eh, not so much now. Not since 2012/13.
 
Back