They have already said that they aren't looking at breaking the contract.I wonder if McLaren has CAD designs drawn up for their car to fit other engine options...
I wonder if McLaren has CAD designs drawn up for their car to fit other engine options...
They have already said that they aren't looking at breaking the contract.
Just pull out Honda, you are wasting your time and your money.
Looks like Haas still can't part with Brembo which means their braking problem is still not fixed according to Grosjean (article is in french, I didnt found it on the english part). Apparently they are trying to change to Carbon Industrie brakes but it's not done yet.
https://fr.motorsport.com/f1/news/grosjean-haas-freins-plait-pas-880811/
i'm guessing F1 contract are not that simple to break and would involve lots of money if done so. And Haas being in America probably doesnt help things (because of how laws works over there).Buy the freins, put them on, deal with the legal fallout.
If the brakes are so bad that it's a safety issue, they should be able to get out of it easily enough.i'm guessing F1 contract are not that simple to break and would involve lots of money if done so. And Haas being in America probably doesnt help things (because of how laws works over there).
Just pull out Honda, you are wasting your time and your money.
It smacks of marketing MuckLarun-Honda ZOMG!!!11!1! SeNNa!!2! instead of entering with a supplier you actually believe can and will deliver.
It was reckless to enter a 10-year deal (as has been said in this thread) with a supplier who hadn't built this type of engine before. Reckless.
Mercedes using the same strategy as in the past making Ferrari look like the team to beat. On the other side, Ferrari looks really good this year and as a lifetime Ferrari fan, there is always that hope that they really are that strong again. Can't wait for Melbourne...
With the regulation changes for 2017 there is a limit to how much Mercedes can sandbag their performance. I think they'll want to know the performance potential of the package.
Timing doesnt mean anything in term of who's fastest until FP3 at Melbourne really and even then, some teams will probably hide their pace still. Mercedes is knowned to have a qualification mode on engine that no one else have at least with a mercedes engine and they never use it before qualification.With the regulation changes for 2017 there is a limit to how much Mercedes can sandbag their performance. I think they'll want to know the performance potential of the package.
Edit: Mclaren has caused another Red flag.
There's a fundamental, inescapable truth at the heart of engineering problem: the move moving parts a thing has, the more there is that can go wrong with it.How does a car company with so much money do so poorly with reliability or whatever the problem is? The same can be asked with Ferrari and their performance in 2014.
... Because they're secretly the same company and all those non-descript Japanese businessmen are really just a front for the Illuminati/the deep state/SPECTRE/the Democrats?so it's not surprising to see Honda choking at this point.
Initially I saw it as nothing more than a hapless attempt to rekindle what used to be a powerful force in F1.It was reckless to enter a 10-year deal (as has been said in this thread) with a supplier who hadn't built this type of engine before. Reckless.
It smacks of marketing MuckLarun-Honda ZOMG!!!11!1! SeNNa!!2! instead of entering with a supplier you actually believe can and will deliver.
In all seriousness though, here's to hoping this is more like 2014 testing where the Renault engines kept dying and people thought Red Bull were screwed, then they won 3 races. It's Honda, though.