2017 Formula 1 Azerbaijan Grand PrixFormula 1 

  • Thread starter Jimlaad43
  • 952 comments
  • 52,129 views
1478779115881.jpg
He was 28th in his first season of GP2 and won in his fourth. Palmer is no Lewis Hamilton but he is a known quantity and the way he is treated by the F1 community is ridiculous.
 
He was 28th in his first season of GP2 and won in his fourth. Palmer is no Lewis Hamilton but he is a known quantity and the way he is treated by the F1 community is ridiculous.

While I usually detest a certain users better than thou thoughts on most drivers in F1, I will say that like Paul Di Resta, Palmer also had this thought of he was an amazing driver before ever seeing or driving the car. This attitude and approach seems to be the fuel that drives the hate for him. Stroll I have a hard time seeing justified hate, because most people use his Monza wreck in the junior series. However, Stroll for the most part this season has been a victim when it comes to DNFs and has actively been trying to learn and seems to be humble and not big headed.
 
Hamilton sounding unbelievably chill for a man who's lost a sure podium here for the second year in a row...

EDIT: Vettel presenting us with 'alternate facts' where there wasn't a side-to-side collision...
 
And Lewis with a blank stare when being asked about his brake check so...

What blank stare? I just watched the Sky interview they asked him what happened he said he didn't know, and then talked about being hit on the side. Even Vettel believes that Lewis didn't actually brake check him and rather slowed up to allow distance on the SC. But also believes as many that it wasn't the right area to do it. Look you clearly think Lewis was malicious, stewards have data they can garner from the teams. You're clips of data show he slowed up but doesn't prove he did after being hit or before or whatever. Nor does it prove a brake check as has been stated.

Ryk
Ban them both - Double points finish for Sauber and McLaren

Ban both for what?
 
So Sauber and McLaren have a double points finish. Seems like a valid reason.

Build a better car and engine, then you wont need hand outs.

Toto Wolff is not a happy man and letting Ted know.

I mean Sky and BBC always do this crap, where they jump to a narrative (much like some on this forum) when it doesn't work out for Lewis and it's stupid. Some places that would cost a person their job, and livelihood for something that was a simple mistake or fault. Mercedes don't know yet and for Sky to press on after being told they don't know, is typical Ted Kravitz. Glad Toto told him to shove off.
 
What blank stare? I just watched the Sky interview they asked him what happened he said he didn't know, and then talked about being hit on the side. Even Vettel believes that Lewis didn't actually brake check him and rather slowed up to allow distance on the SC. But also believes as many that it wasn't the right area to do it. Look you clearly think Lewis was malicious, stewards have data they can garner from the teams. You're clips of data show he slowed up but doesn't prove he did after being hit or before or whatever. Nor does it prove a brake check as has been stated.
If you think I am multi-quoting this mess you are crazy.
 
I think that Vettel drove into Lewis because he let go of his steering wheel. So I think it was more of a whoopsie than a deliberate bump.

I totally disagree with you, Vettel 'wheel-butted' Hamilton deliberately and should be DQ'd.
He shouldn't have retaliated whether Hamilton slowed down or not.
 
If you think I am multi-quoting this mess you are crazy.

Okay so once again you're doing this song and dance of, can't supposedly discern it so why bother. I don't see malicious acts on either driver, I see a misjudgment on one and a heat of the moment mistake on the other. You have an issue with either of them and not just you but anyone, then speak up and we can debate it until the next gp. However, don't do some deliberate "you're crazy" asinine crap cause you think a few screen clips validate your argument.
 

Latest Posts

Back