- 29,166
- Glasgow
- GTP_Mars
Ooh, untested parts! Alonso must be cock-a-hoop.Some of the penalties arise from the fact that both drivers will use a new design of turbo and MGU-H, the motor-generator unit that recovers energy from the turbo.
Ooh, untested parts! Alonso must be cock-a-hoop.
17 laps for Alonso.
Stoffel out on the first.
My wife and I were in the UK for our 20th anniversary last June, and decided to check into the Inn and Pub early to be able to check out the race on TV. I walked from our adjacent room over to the pub to grab a nice cask Golden Ale, and got to see the Sky F1 commenting team in action for a nice change of pace.Azerbaijan GP advert:
Hi, do you like watching Formula 1 race cars? Do you like watching a city praise itself for putting on an event? And do you like sleeping? What would you say if you had them all at the same time? Well this race is the race for you! Join us on June 25th to sleep through the Azerbaijan GP.
Ooh, untested parts! Alonso must be cock-a-hoop.
And they were just sitting there on a workbench. They hadn't even been put into the car yet.Of course, all the tested parts have exploded.
"Both drivers have already used more than the permitted number of relevant parts after just seven races of 21."
Seriously?
Geez... I didn't realize Mclaren-Honda's situation was THAT bad.
I think they'll want to. They know he's good and they know he's been compromised by the chassis. And they might lose Alonso in 2018, so I think they'll do whatever they can to keep him. The only way they will lose him is if someone else picks him up.I hope Mclaren keep him around until they give him a car that lets him show what he can do.
Why is he compromised by the chassis? Alonso's statement of bringing McLaren 5 to 6 tenths nearly a decade ago has finally come to visible fruitation this season. Vandoorne seems a bit better than Stroll and Palmer, if with more experience in later part of the season he doesn't improve then I think McLaren will try and find a potentially better driver even if they keep Alonso. I think with F1 going to 3 PUs for next season, even if Honda find more performance, I'm sceptical they could have reliability of the others so I think McLaren will likely try and switch back so maybe Ocon or Wehrlein could have a chance if Vandoorne doesn't improve.I think they'll want to. They know he's good and they know he's been compromised by the chassis. And they might lose Alonso in 2018, so I think they'll do whatever they can to keep him. The only way they will lose him is if someone else picks him up.
Because the car is horrible.Why is he compromised by the chassis?
A bit better? If you watched his junior career, you'd know he's excellent.Vandoorne seems a bit better than Stroll and Palmer
In fairness, all they had to make was an internal combustion engine, Honda has to combine that in a hybrid system.My previous statement about Arrows F1 making better engines than modern day Honda from the Russian thread still holds true.
Mercedes in position 5 and 6? Pretty much clear now the Mercedes domination have come to an end thank god!
Mercedes down in 5th and 6th. The Mercs had traffic and, as usual, one can never usually take much from FP1 times.
The juxtaposition of these posts made me do a chuckle.Mercedes in position 5 and 6? Pretty much clear now the Mercedes domination have come to an end thank god!
It's one of the best chassis on the grid, PU is horrible though. Hopefully Honda make a decent step in performance and reliability for at least the final part of the season so McLaren can start scoring points regularly. Probably the worst chassis they had in the hybrid era was the 2014 one yet they scored the most points with it, what a difference a good PU makes... Since getting Prodromou back, they've become again a decent F1 chassis maker which is good to see.Because the car is horrible.
A bit better? If you watched his junior career, you'd know he's excellent.
Probably the most overrated driver in F1, he is quite a bit older than some of the established younger F1 drivers. If he was better than Verstappen, I think he would have been in F1 much sooner and also look more competitive relative to his teammate and more positive impressions like how Verstappen had after his second F1 qualifying, not get beaten comprehensively by Alonso but also got beaten by Giovinazzi in a Sauber and get told he needs to change his driving style...I stand by my assessment that Vandoorne is the best young driver in F1. Better than Verstappen. As PM says above, if you've followed his junior career, it's tremendous. He's a very, very far second driver at McLaren. That, compounded with the horrible Honda in the back, is why he's had a slow start to the year. When the car actually has a decent engine, and he's not the definition of a number 2 driver, you'll see what all the hype was about.
He would have been in F1 sooner had he not been signed to McLaren Young Driver Programme. He could have been signed like Wehrlein to Sauber, but McLaren kept a deathlock on him as he'd be in the team full time just one season later.Probably the most overrated driver in F1, he is quite a bit older than some of the established younger F1 drivers. If he was better than Verstappen, I think he would have been in F1 much sooner
Verstappen was in a much better car than Vandoorne is in right now, one that doesn't break down constantly and suffer from large power deficits. And Alonso is by far and away the number 1 driver at McLaren as they try to keep him as happy as possible. And let's not forget he's the best F1 driver on the grid. Period.and also look more competitive relative to his teammate and more positive impressions like how Verstappen had after his second F1 qualifying, not get beaten comprehensively by Alonso but also got beaten by Giovinazzi in a Sauber and get told he needs to change his driving style...
And with this quote, it all becomes clear. If you think Maldonado is a better driver than Vandoorne, you're absolutely delusional and have no clue what talent is.I would rate Maldanado as a quicker F1 driver than Vandoorne for the moment, he is out of F1 and brings decent money to team so I think Vandoorne will have a short career in F1 unless he massively improves.
It took Palmer four years to do it. Vandoorne won it in two.Remember you have an issue with how long Palmer took to win GP2
How is he supposed to beat drivers who have a vastly-superior car to him?He seems to be able to beat the drivers who won't make it as a F1 driver but has got defeated by younger drivers than him who made it into F1 like Kvyat, Sainz and Magnussen.
Let's not forget how he won it too. Absolute domination.took Palmer four years to do it. Vandoorne won it in two.