- 24,644
- Anoka, MN
but with Nissan still seeing success elsewhere in GT3 and in LMP2 as a supplier they'll get over it.
I just hope those programs don't end up getting the axe as Nissan's interest in motorsports seems to be waning.
but with Nissan still seeing success elsewhere in GT3 and in LMP2 as a supplier they'll get over it.
Weren't they LMP2 champs?Hearing that KCMG have quit WEC.
No, G drive took them out at Fuji. http://sportscar365.com/lemans/wec/kcmg-drops-lmp2-effort-for-2016/Weren't they LMP2 champs?
You mean KCMG brake tested themNo, G drive took them out at Fuji. http://sportscar365.com/lemans/wec/kcmg-drops-lmp2-effort-for-2016/
“I have already spent a lot of money in FIA WEC and I wish to develop my business. KCMG will be present in ten championships this year
Well that's a good reason I suppose. Do they ever sleep?!Well no wonder:
No a moronic driver who should have never been signed decided to impersonate Pastor Crashonado and did a piece of driving that should have gotten a penalty.You mean KCMG brake tested them![]()
Well that's a good reason I suppose. Do they ever sleep?!![]()
Was that a joke?You could say they tend to work...around the clock
.....I'm not leaving.
I am hoping Toyota give us a couple of blurred spy-shots of the TS050-HYBRID from Aragon on Tuesday as it takes to the track for the first time. We got them when the TS040-HYBRID was been given it's initial shakedown.
I'll not get my hopes up but it would be nice.
Ah yes the old upshift to go slower and brake so we can lose the championship and destroy the car trick, how clever of them.👍You mean KCMG brake tested them![]()
You mean KCMG brake tested them![]()
No a moronic driver who should have never been signed decided to impersonate Pastor Crashonado and did a piece of driving that should have gotten a penalty.
I take it you read the stewards report which statesYeah, I've got to agree with catamount39 on this one. KCMG brought their data to the FIA for a reason. If they knew that he had brake tested the G-Drive car, then they wouldn't have presented it to them. For them to feel the need to bring data to the FIA means that they definitely felt that Richard (Who is an awful driver mind you) didn't do anything out of the ordinary. The more likely thing that happend was that there was a pretty hefty load of cash delivered, under the table, to the FIA from G-Drive to let that maneuver slide.
The report of the Technical Delegates conforms that the earlier braking of the car No 47 is the cause of the crash.
on the contrary of the 10 previous laps, the driver of the car No 47 shifted the 6th gear. That slowed down the car No 47 and caused a contact with the car No 28 behind.
that 4/10th later. the driver of the car No 47 begun his breaking zone 40m earlier than at the previous lap extending the braking zone from 150 to 190m.
That is this earlier braking that caused the crash and pit exit of the car No 47.
Watch from 6:22.35 and see the whole thing unfold or FF to 6:33.00,6:49.10 and the final assault at 6:54.36. I doubt it a accident that OnRoak is no longer working with G-Drive.
That doesnt surprise me at all.I'll go with the 2 seperate stewards reports thanks.
well they do have more facts than you get from a video.That doesnt surprise me at all.
Wire transfers too.well they do have more facts than you get from a video.
I take it you read the stewards report which states
There was probably a couple million waving in his face. I think any one would take that up. Mabby he will be back? Who knows.Well, that acting hiatus lasted about 8 months.