GM is more likely to pay out of their own pocket rather than rely entirely on sponsorships who might walk out if results aren't produced after the first year, and thus they can be charged whatever is demanded for the privilege of feeding the other hogs at the trough. Also they're probably more receptive to buying out a team like Audi did and thus not upsetting the status quo.I'm just curious as to why Michael Andretti was the problem. Now that it's just GM, things seem to be progressing all along 🤔. I just saw an F1 article able the statement on GM joining in 2026 and from reading it, it sure sounds like a done deal.
Funny, Andretti tried to buy out Sauber, didn't work...GM is more likely to pay out of their own pocket rather than rely entirely on sponsorships who might walk out if results aren't produced after the first year, and thus they can be charged whatever is demanded for the privilege of feeding the other hogs at the trough. Also they're probably more receptive to buying out a team like Audi did and thus not upsetting the status quo.
Herta was always spoken about by Andretti.Let the driver speculation commence. They'll obviously be talk of Sargeant returning but I don't he's good enough. Maybe they poach someone from Indy. Of the current grid most of the good ones are under contract for 2026 already, I think Russell is the only exception.
They'll get good experience of Q1 and Tequila.If they want experience Checo will almost certainly be available.
Again, that's because Andretti was living off sponsorship money and isn't a manufacturer with a (theoretically) limitless bankroll. Both Audi and GM have deeper pockets and the ability to write off their expenses, so they're far less likely to go bust after the first season if it doesn't pan out well.Funny, Andretti tried to buy out Sauber, didn't work...
Michael Andretti was '48 hours' away from agreeing Sauber takeover
Although Michael Andretti did not get his purchase of Sauber over the line, he came close - within "48 hours".www.planetf1.com
No wonder there was so much reluctance to accept the Cadillac effort as long as Andretti was involved.Again, that's because Andretti was living off sponsorship money and isn't a manufacturer with a (theoretically) limitless bankroll. Both Audi and GM have deeper pockets and the ability to write off their expenses, so they're far less likely to go bust after the first season if it doesn't pan out well.
The Renault F1 team's lack of results doesn't mean everyone in the team was incompetent. All F1 teams, even the backmarkers, have loads of talent. But a lack of resources or mismanagement will stifle their potential.AndrettiCadillac F1 really turning into a Renault reunion
Not sure that's a good thing.
Yeah Abiteboul is a clown, his new team has never won anything. Oh wait...Now all they need is Abiteboul to complete the circus.
Which colour scheme is better?
I agree.Blue with white nose looks way better to me. I always associate yellow and black with Corvette racing, it doesn't really fit the Cadillac brand in my opinion.
View attachment 1408467
He is even further away from a superlicense regarding the needed points than Herta who'd also need to finish Indycar 2025 in 4th or better after 10th - 10th - 2nd in the last 3 seasons.Bring in Kyle Larson to put in his money where his mouth is!
If I remember, Cadillac's ALMS prototypes in the early 2000s were gunmetal grey top and black bottom.I always associate yellow and black with Corvette racing, it doesn't really fit the Cadillac brand in my opinion.
View attachment 1408467
To be honest, i think using Corvette (and therefore yellow) rather than Cadillac is a better fit in F1. Corvette as a brand has much more kudos outside of north america, but i guess its a marketing thing with GM wanting to push the Cadillac brand into new markets.Blue with white nose looks way better to me. I always associate yellow and black with Corvette racing, it doesn't really fit the Cadillac brand in my opinion.
View attachment 1408467
I think it's very similar to how for Toyota, they use Lexus branding for GT3 and Toyota for LMH. Or how Honda raced in GT3, whereas Acura is in LMDh.To be honest, i think using Corvette (and therefore yellow) rather than Cadillac is a better fit in F1. Corvette as a brand has much more kudos outside of north america, but i guess its a marketing thing with GM wanting to push the Cadillac brand into new markets.
Well, don't forget Cadillac is a luxury oriented marque which fits the opulent image of Formula 1 more. AMG, Aston Martin, Alpine, Audi, and previously Alfa Romeo (god that is too many A's) are all upscale brands that people associate with people who have money to burn. Sports car oriented Corvette branding in F1 would kinda stick out awkwardly, like Camry branding does in NASCAR now among the Mustangs and Camaros.To be honest, i think using Corvette (and therefore yellow) rather than Cadillac is a better fit in F1. Corvette as a brand has much more kudos outside of north america, but i guess its a marketing thing with GM wanting to push the Cadillac brand into new markets.