Veinz
Premium
- 5,221
- Ontario
FIA considering Colton Herta’s F1 superlicence credentials
www.motorsport.com
In other words, the FIA is waiting for the check to post to their bank account.FIA considering Colton Herta’s F1 superlicence credentials
www.motorsport.com
[...]the FIA will have to be careful not to set a precedent by bending its own rules in order to help Herta’s case.
[...]
One paddock source closely associated with young drivers told Motorsport.com: “If he gets a licence we might as well all stop investing F3 and F2.”
They didn’t have a problem with this last year[...]the FIA will have to be careful not to set a precedent by bending its own rules
Implying that the new races in Vegas, Miami and Saudi Arabia don't already make the FIA look money hungry.The push for an American driver is completely disingenuous, and really just makes them look money hungry.
Piastri seems like a done deal for McLaren. Alpine will get whatever money they invested in him, and then some. That money will go to buying out Gasly.It could be that Herta is in the frame for McLaren rather than Alpha Tauri ... I mean McLaren would need a back up plan if Piastri gets locked out, and they have already released Ricciardo ??
Well this is my hope anyway as I want Liam Lawson given a shot at F1 !!
It's not meant for you, you're already watching F1. Herta is meant to suck in the average American, who doesn't know that it's borderline impossible to win if you don't drive for the big three teams and has never seen IndyCar. Basically the same people that started watching in 2016, excited to see an American team compete in F1 (lol).As an American, I don't care about an American driver unless they're competitive. I don't care about an 'American' team unless they're competitive. Would I like to see an actual American based team, running American engines and drivers? Sure. But I don't immediately align with a driver because they come from my country.
Norris ended up just fine. If Piastri disappoints, it'll be because of his own shortcomings.I'm glad Piastri is finally getting his chance (did it have to be at the expense of Dan though? 😅 ). Almost feel like he would have been better off staying in the Alpine fold. Especially after the way Dan was treated. There's probably going to be a lot of pressure on Oscar to get some good results early.
We don't want to create a system where you try to pick out series that have the least resistance, where the scoring ability is the highest.
I think the F4/F3/F2 echelon is something that works for Europe
All of this.I really don't get some of the arguments being thrown around against giving IndyCar (and SuperFormula) more points to at least make them even with F2.
Like this one from Wolff
If IndyCar was indeed super easy to score a championship, why do those that hold super licenses not instantly dominate when coming over? I do find it funny how F1 seems to still feel threatened by IndyCar (and it's various predecessors) even though it stopped being a threat nearly 30 years ago.
A yes, F2 (and formerly GP2), the series where the champions more often than not amount to nothing in F1...
Between the Andretti thing and the super license scenario I really question how F1 can be the "pinnacle of motorsport". How can you be the top level of competition but have insanely restrictive requirements for entry?
We can argue the toss about which one is the least inept in any given period but Formula One always has always had pay drivers and will always have pay drivers. That is a simple fact everybody needs to accept.Plus let’s not forget about the pay drivers. The Stroll situation alone makes F1 look ridiculous. Latifi is hands down the worst driver on the grid. And it took a war to get rid of Mazipin, who should never have been in an F1 car to begin with.
My issue is if you’re going to allow people to pay for seats, why put up walls that may block other talented drivers from joining the same series? It creates the notion that money is more important than talent, which doesn’t seem consistent for something that’s calling itself ‘the pinnacle of motorsport’We can argue the toss about which one is the least inept in any given period but Formula One always has always had pay drivers and will always have pay drivers. That is a simple fact everybody needs to accept.
Pay drivers have to jump through the same hoops though.My issue is if you’re going to allow people to pay for seats, why put up walls that may block other talented drivers from joining the same series? It creates the notion that money is more important than talent, which doesn’t seem consistent for something that’s calling itself ‘the pinnacle of motorsport’
This is kind of my point though, the experience in those feeder series hasn’t done a whole lot for them in F1. Yes Stroll has 3 podiums, but he’s 18th in points this year. Latifi is the only driver on the grid without points.Pay drivers have to jump through the same hoops though.
You can't get to F1 without the required super licence points (or special dispensation for equivalent experience, as will be required with Herta), so while Latifi and Stroll are only still there because money keeps them there, they did get the super licence points to qualify in the first place: Latifi raced three seasons in F2, won six races, and finished second in 2019 behind Nyck de Vries; Stroll won F4, Euro F3, and TRS.