GTPNewsWire
Contributing Writer
- 21,833
- GTPHQ
This is the discussion thread for a recent post on GTPlanet:
This article was published by Kyle Patrick (@SlipZtrEm) on February 1st, 2017 in the Automotive News category.
If you mean real world car show news you'd be right.It seems the news is starting to pick up again.
If you mean real world car show news you'd be right.
Nope, just in the past day Pikes Peak is returning to the series and a new car was announced. So it's news for Gran Turismo in general after going months without anything major.
I think Johnny's point is that direct news on the game hasn't picked up, PD are still silent.
Exactly, this isn't PD news it's Geneva Car Show/Pininfarina news. Same with the Pike's Peak information "leak", not from PD either.I think Johnny's point is that direct news on the game hasn't picked up, PD are still silent.
Nope, just in the past day Pikes Peak is returning to the series and a new car was announced. So it's news for Gran Turismo in general after going months without anything major.
Strictly speaking, that's not true. We don't know when/if Pikes Peak is returning to the series: all we know is that Polyphony has locked it up so that other developers no longer have access to it, exactly how EA handled Porsche.
I mean, yeah, it's assumed that the track will arrive in a game—probably GT Sport—but so far, we've had no word from Polyphony, only from other developers.
It's only been almost two months since PSX, and over five since the delay announcement. In GT terms, those are both very short amounts of time.
Exactly, this isn't PD news it's Geneva Car Show/Pininfarina news. Same with the Pike's Peak information "leak", not from PD either.
I'd say that a Vision Gran Turismo car tease is some Gran Turismo news but maybe I'm just missing something here.
Even when they want to hire, they don't speak too loud. And IMO, it's a big news that English speakers can work at Poly. But no, a simple line on the frontpage of Poly's website. No fb post, twitter or on the official GT website. Still in the 90's...Strictly speaking, that's not true. We don't know when/if Pikes Peak is returning to the series: all we know is that Polyphony has locked it up so that other developers no longer have access to it, exactly how EA handled Porsche.
I mean, yeah, it's assumed that the track will arrive in a game—probably GT Sport—but so far, we've had no word from Polyphony, only from other developers.
It's only been almost two months since PSX, and over five since the delay announcement. In GT terms, those are both very short amounts of time.
Yes, "PD News". ie, news directly from Sony/PD/Gran Turismo about the game. The point was simply that these two news items are a coincidence occurring at the same time, it doesn't mean we're suddenly going to get an influx of news related to the game because PD themselves are still silent.
People said this would be the case with Standard cars before GT5 releasedts not like you are forced to pick them,
And why isn't it?I get excited when real world car manufacturers make a concept car i can drive in a game, it's not like a random dude made a concept car
Its not like you are forced to pick them
but wont make because of price, regulations etc.
it's not like a random dude made a concept car
For people saying it's a driving simulator, true PD want to be a simulator but also want to satisfy all kinds of gamers, with different content, from rally, gokart, pikes peak (hopefully in GTS), le mans, formula 1, road cars, old cars new cars, concept cars, vgt cars, even moon cars lol.
News pedant
In my case, and from what I've read others say on this forum, a big part of the objection is that the resources used to create the VGT's could have been used to create other, more popular cars. Glaring omissions from the GT lineup like a premium version of the Supra, BMW E30, classic F1 cars that appear in other games, and many, many other popular cars, are being supplanted by fantasy cars that have no emotional connection to many GT fans.Why do people hate VGT cars? Its not like you are forced to pick them, I like the idea of driving cars which different manufacturers have dreamed of but wont make because of price, regulations etc.
It's a game and work like this that manufacturers put behind is only a bonus for me, i get excited when real world car manufacturers make a concept car i can drive in a game, it's not like a random dude made a concept car
For people saying it's a driving simulator, true PD want to be a simulator but also want to satisfy all kinds of gamers, with different content, from rally, gokart, pikes peak (hopefully in GTS), le mans, formula 1, road cars, old cars new cars, concept cars, vgt cars, even moon cars lol.
Well thats something else, because there were 200 premium cars and 800 standard cars in GT5. 200 cars for a GT game is not much, if you only could pick premium cars. So if people didnt pick the standard cars, they could only pick 20% of the cars in GT5. There are not many VGT cars, its not like people are missing out 80% of the cars in the game. There are only 20 VGT cars for now, so why not let people enjoy those 20 cars? It was another story if 80 cars were VGT and 20 were real cars, then we could compare with your GT5 example, but thats not the case.People said this would be the case with Standard cars before GT5 released
And why isn't it?
Because PD made agreement with the manufacturers and not a random dude that made a concept cars ... Why u asking?
No it's not. The game this car might be in is so unknown that we don't even have a release date. How can you claim "just don't use it" when we have no idea if you can actually have that choice?Well thats something else,
You already said that. Why is that actually different from if a game developer or independent artist, who in 2017 would have likely gotten the same formal training as one who worked in an automotive design studio, came up with something?Because PD made agreement with the manufacturers and not a random dude that made a concept cars ... Why u asking?
No it's not. The game this car might be in is so unknown that we don't even have a release date. How can you claim "just don't use it" when we have no idea if you can actually have that choice?
You already said that. Why is that actually different from if a game developer or independent artist, who in 2017 would have likely gotten the same formal training as one who worked in an automotive design studio, came up with something?
What is the difference to me and you, the end user? It's still just a fantasy machine, whether a manufacturer designed it or a random joe.
No difference to me once I'm on the track, they're both fantasy, fictional batmobiles that doesn't exist properly in reality and I wouldn't care about either of them.