- 1,411
- Shaggy_Alonso
What's wrong with adding an extra person on his own team by himself?
Dunno, it's always been in the rules. But I personally wouldn't be against it. Obviously Kakundoo is the person to ask regarding it.
What's wrong with adding an extra person on his own team by himself?
Glad someone told us it was going to be raining, thanks kak, thats not how you run a tournament, you get to practice in the rain all week and dont say anything to us, that was BULL$%#T, then you take me out because i said something adout it
@Shaggy, congratulations on the win, a good points haul for Jordan.
But for the second time what you see on your screen can be completely different from that of others. Sorry but you're inadvertently adding to the flames in this argument.
Also I dont see Kak giving out to Rob after he moved across the track and straight into Kak, who then spent about 5 seconds doing 360s in a field way off the side of the track.
Also, I got your message Rob and replied, no hard feelings at all. 👍
Did Rob wait for Kakundoo? If he did then there is no issue here, that's all I'm getting at. And although I agree things sometimes aren't what they seem in this game online, Duck didn't punt off Kak and then drive on, that much is clear. For sure, in all probability he didn't notice, but he just should have checked, that's all I'm saying.
Kakundoo had the inside line going through the fast turn 5, side by side with Duck when he punted the latter off the track
No Rob didnt wait, although I think he did go wide in the following corner, and Kak may have gotten the place back as a result.
When you say this, do you mean Kak had the inside line, with more than 3/4 of his car alongside Zeroduck then as kak started to move towards the outside of the track he hit Zeroduck. If this is the case and Zeroduck had enough room to move further wide without running out of track, then what you describe is in fact clearing Kak of any wrong doing.
In Formula 1 you are allowed 'push' another car to the outside of the track, provided you have 3/4 of your car alongside them and you leave them enough room for their car to actually fit within the track. If the other car is less then half way alongside the other then they must yield if the car in the lead moves across.
Look, I had the inside of the track. And from where I was, I was hitting the apex. If I had turned in anymore, then I would have spun my car or would have got a penalty. I never turned right, because this would have screwed me over. The only person that could have turned left more into that corner was Duck as he was on the outside. This means that it is Duck that would have caused the collision. Personally, I did not feel or see anything because I was a little ahead and had the inside. So how could I have been at fault?
Genius, you can't say on one hand that what appears on screen is different from what is actually happening, and then suggest on the other that Kakundoo did nothing wrong because he 'appeared' to have left Duck enough room to fit on the track. I don't know if enough room was left for him, and if I said I did then everyone would just repeat the same thing that whatever you see isn't necessarily correct. That is a real life F1 rule which for obvious reasons is pretty hard to apply to our races. From my perspective, Duck didn't turn in to Kak, Kak took the inside line and although he didn't push to the right, there was a colision. When I say inside line, he wasn't hugging the apex, he was quite far wide, but whether or not he left enough room is open to debate. But really, when before has that not been a case for waiting for someone? We've always maintained that rule, even if you're not 100% at fault, for arguments sake you should wait in that type of incident. I'm pretty sure Ardius and Gyles would back me up on that.
And please don't get at me like I'm just adding flames to this, if someone is hard done by in a race I don't think it should just be brushed under the carpet incase some people end up having a disagreement over it. No doubt people will say "It's only a game" or "It's meant to be fun", but if that's the case then what is the point in applying so many rules in the opening post if in reality, anything goes?
Your right, that sort of precise decision making is impossible in our races due to the lag. Also I wasnt saying that we should not blame Kak for not waiting, based solely on how you explained it, I was just pointing out how what you said could have been interpreted.
Also I think in the first championship we had the rule that if the person very near you went off you would wait. But is this really fair? If someone drops it all on there own whilst being overtaken, or closes in on the other person too much should the other driver wait?
Although I dont think that scenario is fair, I do think it should be a policy we have in the future.
I apologise for accusing you of fanning the flames. I realise that you only want to get to the bottom of this and iron out these problems so as the dont affect the rest of the races.
I did let Kak back passed but no i didnt stop i slowed down a bit to let him catch up then let him past me it was a few corners after the incident
I think we're in complete agreement then. And I can understand your point of view and Kakundoo's; honestly a big part of me is in agreement that it is unfair that you have to wait if you're 100% convinced you're not at fault for an incident, but equally the other driver can be 100% convinced that you are at fault in this game. I think the best way around it is just to be polite. Sure if it means we have to race like a bunch of fannies, so be it. It's better than arguments every week.
I've just realised, I've never known your name. I'm Ben anyway. Where are you from down south?
Personally, I think we should just stop the arguments for now. I know everyone wants to get to the bottom of things, but there is no point lingering on about it.
On to Melbourne!
Not a great track for me
Okay then, that's fair. From now on we must note also how far behind a driver is from another at the end of the race. For example:
1. GT4 Genius
2. Rob101 +13.000
3. HEMIata +24.000
This way, if a penalty is to be imposed then we can change the order of the race.
1. Rob101
2. HEMIata +9.000
3. GT4 Genius +10.000
Obviously, the amount of time added to your race total would depend on the severity of the incident. And if it's done a lot of time by one driver in the race, then a starting grid drop may be imposed for the next race. These are now the rules. Final.
Oh and I'm Jamie.
Personally, I think we should just stop the arguments for now. I know everyone wants to get to the bottom of things, but there is no point lingering on about it.
On to Melbourne!
Not a great track for me
Okay then, that's fair. From now on we must note also how far behind a driver is from another at the end of the race. For example:
1. GT4 Genius
2. Rob101 +13.000
3. HEMIata +24.000
This way, if a penalty is to be imposed then we can change the order of the race.
1. Rob101
2. HEMIata +9.000
3. GT4 Genius +10.000
Obviously, the amount of time added to your race total would depend on the severity of the incident. And if it's done a lot of time by one driver in the race, then a starting grid drop may be imposed for the next race. These are now the rules. Final.
Oh and I'm Jamie.