![]()
Just ran 1:09.594***
For what it is worth, I used my 70 Challenger R/t RM to win the historical cup the first time. And actually here is a picture of it!
![]()
Impressive... well still working on mine, back and forth between the woods and laguna seca < camber tuning track... ran a 1:22.833 there with 532hp, which is about a second faster than I when it got there so if it carries over to deep forest should get another second, then I can tune that drivetrain up to max.
Kalmiya117, here's an idea for this thread, since you started it. If you feel like changing the first post and topic, perhaps convert this to a Tuner's Garage Time Trial Battle... put a few formal rules in place, like new time submissions must include a screenshot (ideally in frame with your psn id at top of screen, if it is... i cant recall... but if so we can verify it goes with submitted ghost) and ghost replay, then we can post the ghost replays in the top 10 it was a clean valid run and have our own leadersboard event.
Racers should be honest, and if they used a garage's tune mention it, then we have a column for a tuner credit also next to each entry. [Tuner X's; Personal; Modified from Tuner X's; etc.] If you have a super secret personal tune it doesn't have to be made public but just mention it's yours or the garage's (or modified from).
Be a fun way to keep an ongoing long running event format where tuners aren't having to meet a deadline for an entry, and test drivers can drive multiple tunes at their leisure.
Tuned mine myself and after that 1:09.594 last night I'm almost certain I can get at least 0.200 faster. I have to fix a little oversteer on corner exits.
One main problem I was having on DeepForest was the front end losing a lot of traction over the bumpy sections and especially topping the hill just after turn one(1). Its never good for your front tires to come off the ground*
Yep. Well that's grip for you, that means you have plenty of it on the rear tires which is good. Double clutch and semi-race flywheel make that wheelie popping more evident, too bad you can't down spec it on RM cars but on many standards, a sports flywheel and/or single clutch could possible give better lap times. Modify your driving and let off throttle for a fraction of a second at crest probably be best if it don't slow you down too much. I took a nice photo from one of my lap replays with mine launching off the top of that crest with all four wheels off the ground, it'll go with the tuning data when I post it, it just looks badass.
Are you driving with with pad and AT shifting, pad with MT shifting, or pedal and wheels? That would be useful to know as well for comparing our lap times. I'm only using DS3 with AT.
I'm on a wheel. Big difference. Better lines.. etc.
You need to run with Manual Trans. You'll be able to brake later with downshifting.
this is my set running 1:09 *DFGT*
If you have some free time today (or anytime, it's a bit lengthy) would you mind reading the following write up I did and then run through it with your DFGT and report back your findings as to whether or not the results experienced with DS3 pad and AT shifting are reproducible with clutch pedal and MT shifting?
How to select and optimize drivetrain components, and the not so obvious effects.
![]()
Just ran 1:09.594***
Purpose would be to determine if you can notice any discernible difference in shift performance or engine braking by using the single clutch over the double clutch, or if the semi-race flywheel has a similar impact on your driving ability with a wheel. The results of testing with DS3 w/ AT was that the combination of single plate clutch with sports flywheel was superior to every other combination I tested (for supplied test car spec).
On the RM Camaro when you do the RM it gives you the racing clutch and flywheel and will not allow you to equip or even buy the lower pricesd ones fyi.
I am aware of this, but I was pointing out my test conditions for standard cars that can be down spec'd and just wanted his feedback on those scenarios.
And for his setup... he already did post it.
Although I am starting to believe that micro tuning does not change that much with the suspension. Anything less than .5 increments seem to have little effect other than looking important. Thoughts?
And I do encourage everyone to post a picture of their camaro! These cars look awesome in many flavors!
So I guess the camaro does prefer a soft setting.
And isthedream, that time is pretty good! I snagged a 1:10:763 today online with new-er setup but I will try yours out for sure! I would imagine with the wheel it is much easier to control and fine drive the car. I myself have never used AT. Can't stand it. I really wish my real life car was equipped with optional manual.
Maybe we can all set a date for perhaps, a Track day? That would be cool. Or, We have it setup where we each run say, 6 laps. And the others just watch. And overall see who can run the best laps?
Although the whole having a wheel deal does help out alot.
Some people think MICRO changes help 'when really... they only run a better lap than that of the previous'.
...
The only reason I lowered my front springs/dampers is because on deepforest the front end tends to come off the ground on key sections of the track.
...
edit!(* From my experience from using DS3 before I got my wheel. I used R2/L2 for Accel/Braking. Gives you so much more control over your throttle and braking since you can be on them both at once. It really helped me out once I changed it up. *)
Well I'm more specific in micro tuning than to look for previous lap over next lap, but new high lap time can be an indicator, so can my speed through the last bend on deep forest, and speed into the deep U with the concrete run-off if utilized correctly.
For fun, try putting stupid amounts of camber on your car... I was getting full four wheel jumps off the top of the hill crests for some great Hazard County Derby style action, lol... only now gotta tune the Dodge Charger RM for the Duke boys to run.
The bit about L2/R2 makes sense I have played it that in the past with previous GT titles and other racing games but I had just gotten accustomed to the controller defaults using stick now. I might go back to L2/R2 and give it some tries for lap time comparisons.
Very interesting, I like your approach to tuning. Out of curiosity, how do you go about setting up initial spring rate? I usually end up having a soft roll bar up front 9/10 times and I didnt really think it was necessary but it was giving me the best results. If there is a better way to find optimal spring rate, I would be very interested to hear about it.
All aids off, ABS 1
Best lap: 1.11.044 with consistent 1:11.1 laps (only ran about 5-6 laps)
Aero: 18/45
Trans: 186 mph
LSD: 10/25/15
Brakes: 6/5
Suspension:
RH: -12 / -10
SR: 11.0 / 10.0
Ext: 7 / 7
Comp: 7 / 7
ARB: 3 / 3
Camber: 2.5 / 1.0
Toe: 0 / .20
I left a tiny bit of understeer in the tune and the front end is still a bit twitchy (seems to be the nature of this car).
this is my set running 1:09 *DFGT*
Aero:
Front(20) Rear(47)
Suspension:
Ride- (-13) / (-11)
Rates- (7.1) / (7.9)
Ext.- (4) / (5)
Comp.- (3) / (4)
Roll- (3) / (5)
Camber- (2.1) / (1.9)
Toe- (-0.21) / (-0.04)
LSD:
Torque (9)
Accel (34)
Braking (8)
Brakes
Front(4) - Rear(7)
*Depending on the track I swap there where front(7) rear(4)