- 2,176
- United Kingdom
Any pictures of the Forza chicane?
I wonder if they'll fill the run off with quick sand so it matches the game
Any pictures of the Forza chicane?
It's not Pole. It's not qualifying.
ACO french twitter account4m ACO ‏@24heuresdumans
L'Audi n°2 ne repartira pas. #LEMANS #24LM #WEC
6m ACO ‏@24heuresdumans
LAudi n°2 pilotée par Allan McNish est arrêtée au Tertre Rouge. Elle est endommagée. #LEMANS #24LM #WEC
8m ACO ‏@24heuresdumans
La Toyota n°7 de Kazuki Nakajima est au ralenti sur le circuit. #LEMANS #24LM #WEC
10m ACO ‏@24heuresdumans
Fin de séance pour la Lola-Toyota n°12 : suspension cassée. #LEMANS #24LM #WEC
Interesting test day anyway so far, confirms Toyota can match the Audi's for speed, but as in '98, reliability will be the issue.
WardezWell they're not matching, a second off, but that's a massive effort for their first time out for sure, it won't be a stretch for them to up the pace a bit to really run at the same pace.
This is bad, now I'm gonna go through testing withdrawls till the practices.
Well, until the past hour or so, it was pretty even, and this morning it was practically the same, which is I agree a decent achievement. I might get RLM withdrawal symptoms too, decent commentary as always.
Yeah, free practice isn't till the 13th
Here's the full schedule:
http://www.lemans.org/wpphpFichiers...s-du-mans/2012-schedule-24-heures-du-mans.pdf
Highcroft Racing ‏@highcroftracing
Close to the end of the day.
@SatoshiMotoyama finishing out the day.
Every lap but 1 on wets on the same 4 Michelin tires. #nissandeltawing
Go to this site.
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/
Fill in your name and e-mail address and you can download a PDF Le Mans Special.
It gives you a good idea about the subscription version of the Race Car Engineering magazine.
http://www.racecar-engineering.com/news/formula-1-powertrains-for-le-mans-in-2014/
Interesting article about 2014 regulations and the possibility of F1 engines debuting in the same year being compatible to use in WEC. They may have even drafted up the rules to accommodate this from the start. Interesting since, as they say in the articles, it'll be a great mix up between the two disciplines and get, at least engine, manufacturers looking at each other more so it's nothing but good.
Although the promised new regulation details for 2014 won't be released for at least another week, there have been a lot of informed speculation saying they're going to increase maximum engine capacity in LMP1 to 5.0 liters. Of course, 2014 spec's for F1 are V6 1.6 liters but they are turbocharged so they'll produce the same, even more, than what the propitiatory LMP1 engine makers will peak at with their take on the new engine rules.
They're going to ban variable geometry turbo chargers that are on the Audis currently for 2014.
The article also states that maximum boost pressure will be 4 bar, which is 58 PSI. So the F1 engines shouldn't be limited at all by that stipulation since I expect F1 turbos to put out around 30PSI, but won't need to go up past 50 (which is what they used to click the turbos up to back in the nutty '80s there for reference).
But they may be limited by the fact that there will be a maximum fuel flow rate. So that may more become the equalizer. But I expect them to do really well. As far as who would use them... that's the clincher, 'cause none of the top teams will right away, so it may be the LMP1"B" cars that pick them up initially. It'll definitely be an interesting sound and test for what are inherently sprint race engines compared to Le Mans.
The last time F1 and LM converged on engines it killed the WSC. These are different circumstances though.
It killed Group C as all the manufacturers just migrated to F1 or left entirely, and the privateers couldn't afford the development costs.
wikipedia page on Group CRise and fall
By 1989, the Group C series popularity was nearly as great as Formula One. When C1 cars were found to be breaking over the 240 miles per hour mark at Le Mans' Mulsanne Straight — the WM-Peugeot recorded the highest 407 km/h (253 mph) — the FIA revolutionized the class by attempting to turn it into a formula series to replace the C2 category (after they proved to be unreliable at endurance races). The new formula restricted the performance of cars built to the original rules (such as the Porsche 962 used by many privateers) and benefited teams using F1-sourced 3.5 L engines — these latter teams being effectively the large manufacturers alone, as the new formula cars were more expensive than the C1 cars. What followed was the quick downfall of Group C, as Ford, Mercedes and Peugeot elected to either concentrate on or move to F1 directly, while F1 engines were unaffordable for privateer teams like Spice and ADA. A lack of entries meant the 1993 Sports Car World Championship was canceled before the start of the first race; however, because the Le Mans 24 hour race had become a non-championship race the previous year, the ACO still allowed the Group C cars to compete (albeit with restrictions). Nevertheless, the race still witnessed protests against the new state of affairs, as spectators placed cloth banners in fences expressing their feelings.
I don't have much knowledge of pre-Group C sportscars thats why I ask.
Oh no, if this is true then it is bad. I see a repeat of the Group C debacle ... the 90's all over again ...
Just for reference, a quick look on wikipedia. Sounds confusing, but there's no doubt on how low things went.
I feared this when the new ACO-FIA friendship was announced. And posted accordingly.