Aliens
- Thread starter Exorcet
- 2,385 comments
- 159,016 views
- 22,551
- Arizona
- HamiltonMP427
Castrol96
(Banned)
- 2,899
- Southampton, UK
- 22,551
- Arizona
- HamiltonMP427
Castrol96
(Banned)
- 2,899
- Southampton, UK
Well it's Bushes secret...
- 22,551
- Arizona
- HamiltonMP427
Dotini
(Banned)
- 15,742
- Seattle
- CR80_Shifty
It you can squint and make it seem like an insulation blanket, then okay. But this thing with its tiger stripes is maybe from a different zoo.
Could this famous UFO caught in the live stream have anything to do with the Black Knight? - This beautiful design is clearly from another world.
- 5,212
- Nicest part of hell
What's even more astonishing is how flat out terrible that anchor is.
The UFO sighting is pretty interesting, I've always found those light phenomenas to be the most believable UFO sightings. It seems to be similar to the incident where a Japanese fright jet was chased around by a large white glowing orb which could even be spotted on the radar. Too bad the pilot in this video did not mention radar sightings.
- 20,681
- TenEightyOne
- TenEightyOne
- 1,916
- Letchworth
- mistersafeway
I don't even see anything particularly alien about that design, it looks like what could pass for alien to most people, so still perfectly conceivable that it's from earth. It could still just be a case of convergent evolution, I guess. It also looks like it might not be real... [sarcasm]although that's obviously just the reality warping drive that can do anything but make it not be seen by humans, obviously 'cause we're special and stuff, which is why they're always watching us.[/sarcasm]
- 22,551
- Arizona
- HamiltonMP427
Wait...don't tell me, no it couldn't be!?
EARTH BASED AND DESIGNED IMAGE, OH THE HUMANITY
Castrol96
(Banned)
- 2,899
- Southampton, UK
What, so you think it's man-made somehow?
Why the hell did NASA cut the live feed the second it appeared!?
- 20,681
- TenEightyOne
- TenEightyOne
If it's an object in space then... yes, that's very likely. We've been shoving crap up there since the 40s.
What if it was never on the live feed? In this age of internets you seem very keen to believe. Why is there no video of it at all? I could imagine the whole NASA-deleted-the-top-secret clip but not that nobody at all had a video grab of it... especially given the huge number of UFO hunters out there waiting for just such a thing to happen. No video at all, just one clip from a conversation with an (apparently) dyslexic half-wit.
The feed goes on-and-off all the time, it's a development project by NASA, not a bulletproof GoPro. You'll know that if you ever watch any of it, of course. Another question... if UFOs are appearing as regularly on the feed as we're told then why are NASA even broadcasting without a 5 minute monitored delay? It's not like anybody would really know.
Dotini
(Banned)
- 15,742
- Seattle
- CR80_Shifty
Castrol96
(Banned)
- 2,899
- Southampton, UK
Why does the feed cut every time as soon as a UFO is caught. And, I've scene live-stream with UFO's flying (stopping and blasting off) by or 'debris' (whatever you think it is) and the Astronaut recording covered them with his hands as soon as they appeared.
So your saying its all just a loss of connection.
About that UFO, by far it can be a alien/man made craft. You must know about the experimental crafts.
That's strange...
- 20,681
- TenEightyOne
- TenEightyOne
Looks like a leaf to me. Interesting that (as you'll already know) it's yet another video-less still from the same person who posted the OMGZ ALYUNZ that got @Castrol96 so aerated initially.
You're right, I must know about them. Humouring you for a moment (and that's a moment more than one might argue is deserved) let's say we have "experimental crafts", why would we fly them onto live feeds?
I believe at this point that you're lying. That's a) against the AUP and b) utterly pointless. You should provide some proof to back up your claim.
So far you've based your case on a picture "snapped from the live feed" by a perennial UFO hoaxer. Not the most impressive argument, at least in my opinion.
Castrol96
(Banned)
- 2,899
- Southampton, UK
Lying! WTF - Here's the footage somebody thankfully addressed to Secureteam.
"Aerated!" - Where did I comment anything referencing me being aerated!!?
**** OFF! - Don't Quote Me!
- 20,681
- TenEightyOne
- TenEightyOne
Fair enough, I should say that I believed you were lying or incorrect. You were incorrect. There are no UFOs stopping or blasting off in that video.
There are over 500,000 known pieces of space junk and, given the lack of atmosphere (not for the want of us trying, eh? eh?), the reflections/refractions of such are visible from a long distance. Square that distance by the effects of fisheye lenses such as this one and you get some lovely curved "flight paths". Move the lens centre (as in this video) and it gets even crazier. That's optics for you. They don't even have to be within the visible cone of the lens to cause refractions, howzabout that then? I'll see if I can find my video of orbs in a church... they dance around in time to the music and everything... except they're an optical illusion.
I didn't say you did, you're mistaken.
That seems aerated to me.
Castrol96
(Banned)
- 2,899
- Southampton, UK
Oh, so you previously said I was "Aerated" by the footage and now I wasn't therefore saying now I am by a different means.
Don't Deny it ******!
Go and use software and watch in thermal view and you'll see them stop and shoot off.
Dotini
(Banned)
- 15,742
- Seattle
- CR80_Shifty
I am unaware of the provenance of the photo @Castrol96 posted. Maybe you or he can find the origin of it. I don't think it came from Streetcap1, but maybe it did!?
- 1,916
- Letchworth
- mistersafeway
Oh, so you previously said I was "Aerated" by the footage and now I wasn't therefore saying now I am by a different means.
He never said that you said you were aerated (whatever he means by that, I just woke up
), he said that you were aerated. Pretty big difference.The first part... just because you censor out the rude word, doesn't mean you didn't say it. If you have to resort to calling him a word like that, you've probably already lost the debate.
The second part, do you mean watch footage shot with a normal camera, but have it showing the heat signatures of objects as if it were shot with a thermal imaging camera? If yes, whoever told you that was possible was lying to you.
- 4,455
- Teesdale
- GTP_Vagabond
Dotini
(Banned)
- 15,742
- Seattle
- CR80_Shifty
@Castrol96
@TenEightyOne
No thanks to either of you, but I have been able to locate the provenance of the tiger stripe UFO depicted in post #1988.
Published on Jan 6, 2015
UFO Sightings NASA Shuts Live Video Feed As Massive UFO Appears! 1/6/2015 Toby Lundh ISS UFO Hunter Expert Manged To capture Stills Of A Massive UFO Just Outside The ISS During A Live Feed! Toby Claims The Live Video And Its Recording has Been Removed From the Nasa Archives! This comment can be public it you like. If this is ISS footage? There should be no problem...Toby said it was captured in 2015, that being said I will share your link in the description! When NASA Shares footage taken down, or not, if it's NASA Footage we the people have the right to share it. Thanks Secureteam10 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAsxf...
In short, secureteam10 and thirdphaseofthemoon both appear to be untrustworthy sources of anomalous material.
On the other hand, I find Streetcap1 a higher order source of anomalies.
@TenEightyOne
No thanks to either of you, but I have been able to locate the provenance of the tiger stripe UFO depicted in post #1988.
Published on Jan 6, 2015
UFO Sightings NASA Shuts Live Video Feed As Massive UFO Appears! 1/6/2015 Toby Lundh ISS UFO Hunter Expert Manged To capture Stills Of A Massive UFO Just Outside The ISS During A Live Feed! Toby Claims The Live Video And Its Recording has Been Removed From the Nasa Archives! This comment can be public it you like. If this is ISS footage? There should be no problem...Toby said it was captured in 2015, that being said I will share your link in the description! When NASA Shares footage taken down, or not, if it's NASA Footage we the people have the right to share it. Thanks Secureteam10 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAsxf...
In short, secureteam10 and thirdphaseofthemoon both appear to be untrustworthy sources of anomalous material.
On the other hand, I find Streetcap1 a higher order source of anomalies.
Dotini
(Banned)
- 15,742
- Seattle
- CR80_Shifty
Apollo 17, Necho crater
What is this, a contaminated negative?
Efecto: Negativo.
https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-136-20863HR.jpg
What is this, a contaminated negative?
Efecto: Negativo.
https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-136-20863HR.jpg
Last edited:
- 20,681
- TenEightyOne
- TenEightyOne
Film damage, according to the crew that scanned them. The three affected images were the last (proper) in the roll, technicians did try to clean the film back in those days but preservation of the film was paramount due to the incredible value... so it was always possible.
Here's another one from the same bracket.
- 22,551
- Arizona
- HamiltonMP427
Plasma monster from the 9th dimension.Apollo 17, Necho crater
What is this, a contaminated negative?
Efecto: Negativo.
https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-136-20863HR.jpg
- 5,212
- Nicest part of hell
