- 40,743
It seems like a fairly straightforward solution instead of attempting (and almost certainly failing) to revive the Assault Weapons Ban would be to compromise and regulate the spooky scary features that they can actually defend the argument of like they already do suppressors and SBRs and shoulder stocks. It seems like it would be particularly applicable for high capacity magazines.
You want your KCI 50 round drum? No problem. Get a tax stamp. Maybe even apply it to receivers with pistol grips (though I'm less sure of the basis for that)? It's most likely not practical to apply that to ones already sold (nevermind the ludicrous idea brought up in the House to retroactively make them a felony to possess) but going forward I wouldn't have much issue with that.
You want your KCI 50 round drum? No problem. Get a tax stamp. Maybe even apply it to receivers with pistol grips (though I'm less sure of the basis for that)? It's most likely not practical to apply that to ones already sold (nevermind the ludicrous idea brought up in the House to retroactively make them a felony to possess) but going forward I wouldn't have much issue with that.
Last edited: