- 31,701
- Buckwheat City
- Dennisch
Not even Fuhrer Tinyhands McMushroom-Peepee?
No, like what happened with Santorum should happen to Donald J. Trump. His name should become the slur.
Not even Fuhrer Tinyhands McMushroom-Peepee?
It already means "fart" and has done for 500 years. What more do you want?No, like what happened with Santorum should happen to Donald J. Trump. His name should become the slur.
It already means "fart" and has done for 500 years. What more do you want?
Hippo Hitler?Fart with pieces shooting out.
Everything is communism if it's not straight up extreme left democracy, that's how it goes now.It's funny how some Americans think that socialism is bad (and imo mistake it for communism).
Cannon, in issuing her order, said that she was not willing to accept the government's assertions that roughly 100 documents taken from Mar-a-Lago were classified -- even though they were labeled as such, with some bearing "SECRET" and "TOP SECRET/SCI" markings.
In appointing Dearie as special master, Cannon urged him to "prioritize review" of the roughly 100 documents with classification markings and asked him to complete his review of all the documents by Nov. 30, more than a month beyond what the DOJ had called for.
"When your property is seized pursuant to a court-ordered search warrant, you are not entitled to judicial relief prior to indictment except for very rare and unusual circumstances.Judge Cannon denied DOJ's motion for partial stay pending appeal.
Her order does not seriously grapple with the issues raised by DOJ, particularly the way in which her order injures national security.
DOJ positioned this as well as possible for appeal.
Cannon's original order was counter to precedent and exceeded her authority. On its own, that order appeared likely to be reversed on appeal.
But DOJ presented Cannon with narrower issues (e.g. need for a national security assessment) that typically the Executive Branch wins on.
She found against DOJ even on the narrow issue of the use by the Executive Branch of its own classified material.
She essentially found that Trump's concerns outweighed the Executive Branch's national security concerns and entitled him to relief no other citizen receives.
When your property is seized pursuant to a court-ordered search warrant, you are not entitled to judicial relief prior to indictment except for very rare and unusual circumstances.
But Cannon found Trump was entitled to a special process despite the countervailing interests.
This sums it up: "Based on the nature of this action, the principles of equity require the Court to consider the specific context at issue, and that consideration is inherently impacted by the position formerly held by Plaintiff."
i.e., former presidents get special treatment.
Given that Cannon knows an appeal is inevitable, I expected her to moderate her position in response to DOJ's motion.
At the very least, I expected a well-reasoned opinion that seriously grappled with the issues raised by DOJ. This is not that opinion. /end
[snort]Maybe Dearie is quiet quitting.
Loose Cannon
I am the federal state.Wait, isn't it a federal offence to transport undocumented immigrants across state lines?
Migrants caught in DeSantis’ monstrous stunt allege federal DHS agent involvementWait, isn't it a federal offence to transport undocumented immigrants across state lines?
Tallahassee immigration attorney Elizabeth Ricci told the Orlando Sentinel Friday that DHS and ICE had to be involved. “ICE likely conspired with the governor’s office to pull off the stunt,” Ricci said. “It couldn’t have been done without their direct involvement.”'
Awesome. So while we investigate trump for seizing and improperly storing federal documents, tampering with elections, and insurrection (and probably tax fraud or whatever), we can also investigate DeSantis and DHS agents for human trafficking.
These are their stories.Awesome. So while we investigate trump for seizing and improperly storing federal documents, tampering with elections, and insurrection (and probably tax fraud or whatever), we can also investigate DeSantis and DHS agents for human trafficking.
Law and order.
Wait, isn't it a federal offence to transport undocumented immigrants across state lines?
Most children crossing the border alone are from Central America, and when they travel without a parent, they usually carry with them contact information of a parent, relative or friend who is expecting them.
Under anti-trafficking legislation passed with bipartisan support by Congress, the children, known by the government as “unaccompanied minors,” must remain in the custody of the U.S. government until a sponsor, usually a family member, has provided requisite paperwork and passed vetting.
Yet while the numbers may have expanded, the flights are part of a process that also occurred under the Bush, Obama and Trump administrations.
“For years, both Republican and Democratic administrations have used charter flights to safely transfer unaccompanied children from the border to shelters nationwide,” said Elora Mukherjee, director of the Immigrants’ Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School.
“The claim that these flights are new or secretive is baseless and irresponsible,” she said.
The NYPost that is cross-sharing Tucker Carlson.
Because there's definitely not more to that story that differentiates itself from what DeSantis did.
Edit: Yep, totally different situations. Helps to read sources that actually dive into the situation instead of trash tabloids right-wing pundits jerk to.
‘Ghost Flights’? The Facts Behind Transporting Migrant Children (Published 2022)
Government flights carrying undocumented children from the border to federally licensed shelters around the country are being criticized by conservative politicians in an election year.www.nytimes.com
The difference is DeSantis has no authority in California. Not shaky ground at all.
Yeah, that's a no. Skimming through was enough to know it's pure trash; the false headline, the crying about the planes being louder than usual, the fake outrage by Dick Santis.If you read the article, it comments on how Biden said they did it, and why.
Nope, not the same circumstance. Biden's "secret" flights are allowed by Congress under both parties, being done since Bush to look after underage children 'til a vetted caretaker comes for them.But if they are going to site federal law, or pursue some sort of federal-whatever, it’s going to be tough being that Biden flew illegal immigrants from Texas to New York… and allegedly Florida
Yeah, that's a no. Skimming through was enough to know it's pure trash; the false headline, the crying about the planes being louder than usual, the fake outrage by Dick Santis.
As he's the President, isn't it Biden 's administration's job to fly undocumented minors that are wards of the state to wherever they can get help?But if they are going to site federal law, or pursue some sort of federal-whatever, it’s going to be tough being that Biden flew illegal immigrants from Texas to New York… and allegedly Florida
Quote it, then. Because it must be hidden in misinformation & fake outrage.If you don’t want to read it, that’s fine.
But if you read it, it’s all there.
Quote it, then. Because it must be hidden in misinformation & fake outrage.
Or... read what I shared that sums it up without the conservative spin on it.