Scaff
Moderator
- 29,734
- He/Him
- ScaffUK
It would also be honest, something they have zero concept of.That wouldn't fit in a tweet.
It would also be honest, something they have zero concept of.That wouldn't fit in a tweet.
I feel that they hate that the islanders actually followed through with their promises to welcome immigrants because their worldview depends on the left being liars. Because the alternative would be to accept that they themselves are worse at being human beings.It would also be honest, something they have zero concept of.
Whenever the next ice storm happens.How long before Ted Cruz deports himself back to Cancun?
Or **** storm.Whenever the next ice storm happens.
I'm more worried that people believe what he's saying. They all occupy a mirror universe.Is this overdramatised or is the, uh... modified one-armed salute to the demagogue with the ominous music someting to be worried about?
Isn't this modern day politics 101, ombined with the classes of how to keep your friends in high positions?fine with risking screwing everyone over if it helps them save their senate position.
Now is not the time for business as usual. Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger fell on their swords to do the right thing. This is a worthy cause.Isn't this modern day politics 101, ombined with the classes of how to keep your friends in high positions?
Yep. Once a politician gets elected, they will do everything they can to stay elected. With great power, comes no responsibility or morality.Senate delays same-sex marriage vote until after midterms
The decision comes as bipartisan negotiators hoped for a vote as soon as Monday but faced trouble lining up 10 Republicans to break a filibuster.www.politico.com
There aren't 10 republican senators willing to vote for gay marriage today. Apparently there is some hope that there will be after the midterms, but there is a reasonable chance that the senate will be a republican majority after the midterms, in which case it's reasonably likely that gay marriage falls at the supreme court. Even if the Senate does have the votes after the midterms, they're changing the wording and if the house is republican-led they'll be too busy impeaching biden or some nonsense to take up re-passing the bill.
The basic idea is this. There are republican senators that would support the gay marriage bill if not for the fact that they fear they'll be ousted in the election if they do. So they want to wait to support it until after the midterms. Not only does this assume good faith, which is not a safe assumption, it puts gay marriage at the whim of the midterms because some senators are scared they'll lose their seat. Again, the assumption here is that they know this is the right thing to do, and are fine with risking screwing everyone over if it helps them save their senate position.
Definitely.This is a worthy cause.
"Authorities in Texas have opened a criminal investigation into Gov. Ron DeSantis’ operation to fly roughly 50 Venezuelan migrants from Texas to Martha’s Vineyard last week."
Instructions unclear. Is the left buttcheek a sanctuary city, or does the left buttcheek need a sanctuary city? Or do I read it like a headline where the comma means "and" so Sanctuary Cities and My Left Buttcheek? Or perhaps it's a list of places where migrants can go, which consists of sanctuary cities and the OP's left buttcheek. The latter doesn't seem like it would be the appropriate place for migrants.
"But sanctuary city. Let's go Brandon."Martha's Vineyard is flat, mostly cold, has few services, the soil is barren (because it's surrounded by ocean), and everything is quite expensive since it literally has to be shipped in. Neat to visit for a weekend, but not my idea of a place to stay.
Can we just take a moment to acknowledge that the whole country knows that Trump took classified documents to an unsecure location with the intent to use them as some kind of leverage for some kind of gain, and that a big portion of the country seems to be just totally fine with that?
Which he will - he'll appeal all the way up to the SCOTUS where, by an amazing coincidence, Republicans have stacked the deck in their favour.What's going on in court is not really to decide whether any of that is true, it's to figure out whether Trump can find some kind of technicality or corruption to get off.