- 29,980
- a baby, candy, it's like taking.
- TexRex72
...
So it's also different because of venue.Yeah, this case is a little different because it's eight families suing him, instead of one. So hopefully any penalties handed out should be greater.
As I mentioned earlier in the thread when the Texas trial wrapped, tort reform laws in Texas (they're not unique to Texas and they're generally a good thing) throttled the damages sums awarded by the jury way back. As I recall, the total awarded, economic and punitive, was something like $50 million, but the law limits economic compensatory damages (relating to financial hardship caused by the alleged wrongdoing in a suit) to twice the amount sought by the plaintiff and it limits punitive damages (intended to punish the defendant for their alleged wrongdoing) to $750,000. There were two damages figures determined by the jury in Texas: the economic damages were less than $5 million, but the amount claimed by plaintiffs was considerably less than that figure (something like $100,000) and the punitive damages were something like $45 million. The total was still throttled down to under $1 million as I recall.
Connecticut, where the current trial is being held, has also enacted tort reform (again, lots of states have)--it's actually among the most strict in the country. I'm not aware that there's a cap on economic compensatory damages, but that's rooted in how plaintiffs can reasonably have been financially impacted. Punitive damages, however, are capped at attorneys' fees and overall cost of having the suit adjudicated.
Also at play in Connecticut is an unfair and deceptive business practices law that plaintiffs argue applies to their case because Jones' business relevant to the suit is speech itself by virtue of him having benefitted financially by his deceptive, defamatory speech. Tort reform explicitly doesn't apply to suits brought under this law.
The case as it's playing out is very different from the one in Texas, being that it's not nearly so farcical with Jones' counsel sending opposing counsel vast swaths of information not limited to what was required of them pursuant to discovery. Of course Jones is trying to make the whole thing a farce, attacking the judge on his show and, most recently, addressing the jury and telling them to "do their own research" on the facts of the case (literally counter to actual jury instructions, which the judge reiterated).
Eeyup.Doubt though that any punishment will be heavy enough to truly see that POS disappear completely. He'll always have morons who are more than willing to give him money.
Last edited: