America - The Official Thread

  • Thread starter ///M-Spec
  • 38,707 comments
  • 1,594,473 views
What a world, what a world... perhaps Zyglis should have made the flying Larrys leave smoke trails which spell out the words "SURRENDER FAUCI".
 
Last edited:
Dave Chappelle invites Elon Musk onto the stage during his live show. Audience boos Elon Musk for ten minutes straight. Chappelle rips into the audience for being jealous poor people. Twitter deletes the account of a person posting the video of the event, although some others remain (watch it while it's hot).



Just another day, as they say.
 
FjyiaqMXwAAF3tm


Pasty bitch.
 
Tesla's autopilot new and improved. Will not only steer cars into various objects but will also steer stock price off a cliff!
 
Jesus ****ing Christ, the conservative bitchfit over preferred pronouns is so ****ing idiotic, not least because they certainly have their own. As thin as her skin is, can you just imagine how completely Musk would lose it if she was to consistently be deliberately misgendered in media? She'd go ****ing nuclear. Hers would be a meltdown for the ages.
 
Last edited:
If they have no pronouns, doesn't that mean we can refer to the individual with any pronoun we want? I prefer calling "the individual" it.
 
If they have no pronouns, doesn't that mean we can refer to the individual with any pronoun we want? I prefer calling "the individual" it.
If lack pronouns altogether, it's inappropriate to use any when referring to .
 
Jesus ****ing Christ, the conservative bitchfit over preferred pronouns is so ****ing idiotic, not least because they certainly have their own. As thin as her skin is, can you just imagine how completely Musk would lose it if she was to consistently be deliberately misgendered in media? She'd go ****ing nuclear. Hers would be a meltdown for the ages.
Ironically it was immediately clear who you were referring to despite the misgendering which further underlines the inconsequentiality of their objections.
 
Last edited:
Ironically it was immediately clear who you were referring to despite the misgendering which further underlines the inconsequentiality of their objections.
Even more ironically, according to the person, the pronoun you're supposed to use (which is not a pronoun) is Fauci. That's Fauci the owner of SpaceX, Tesla, and Twitter. Not Anthony Fauci the NIAID Director.

The other non-pronoun pronoun is prosecute. As in, at least one employee accused prosecute of sexual harassment and soliciting prostitution. As in prosecute could be prosecuted for soliciting a prostitute.
 
Last edited:
Even more ironically, according to the person, the pronoun you're supposed to use (which is not a pronoun) is Fauci. That's Fauci the owner of SpaceX, Tesla, and Twitter. Not Anthony Fauci the NIAID Director.
I wasn't sure whether prosecute was being totally serious so decided to use the neutral pronoun "their" instead.
 
Last edited:
Even more ironically, according to the person, the pronoun you're supposed to use (which is not a pronoun) is Fauci. That's Fauci the owner of SpaceX, Tesla, and Twitter. Not Anthony Fauci the NIAID Director.

The other non-pronoun pronoun is prosecute. As in, at least one employee accused prosecute of sexual harassment and soliciting prostitution. As in prosecute could be prosecuted for soliciting a prostitute.
The way prosecute has presented fauci pronouns is that "prosecute" is the subject pronoun (performing the actions and replacing he or she or they) and "fauci" is the object pronoun (receiving the actions and replacing him/his or her or them/their) - as prosecute/fauci supplants he/him, she/her, they/them.

Therefore prosecute is the owner of SpaceX, Tesla, and Twitter, and at least one employee accused fauci of sexual harassment stating prosecute offered her a horse. Prosecute has certainly made a mess of the language with fauci attempt at flexing on pronouns.

I guess we shouldn't expect anything better from someone who calls (edit) fauci child X Æ A-XII.
 
Last edited:
Back