"State Senator Brian Boner", huh-huh huh-huh-huh.Wyoming Republicans take a stand, want to ban electric cars
As childish legislative stunts go, this one is certainly pathetic.arstechnica.com
Sen. Boner is taking a hard stand.Good to see Boner taking a stand, though I'm not sure much will come from it.
You could say his Effort is Dysfunctional.Though it seems to be a flaccid effort.
That the bitches pushing the bill are keen to send a copy to California's governor illustrates both the measure's performativity and the underlying dysfunction. It's insane.It's a pretty empty thing anyway since it's just pandering.
I imagine there are plenty who live in Cheyenne and who are unlikely to travel the rest of the state for whom an EV could make a great deal of sense. Cheyenne's an actual real city, plus it's crazy close to Denver.Owning an EV in Wyoming makes little sense considering how far away things are.
He made his bed with them, let the leopards eat his face.I wonder how their big idol Elon feels about this.
If I were a GOP strategist and I wanted to come up with a way to scare away as many younger and/or urban voters as possible and firmly locate the GOP in coocoo land while simultaneously not actually accomplishing anything, this would be right up there.Modern American conservatism is mental illness.Wyoming Republicans take a stand, want to ban electric cars
As childish legislative stunts go, this one is certainly pathetic.arstechnica.com
I mean...it "owns the libs," right? Right?not actually accomplishing anything
Eye rolls are a clear admission of defeat. Everyone knows that.I mean...it "owns the libs," right? Right?
I imagine there are plenty who live in Cheyenne and who are unlikely to travel the rest of the state for whom an EV could make a great deal of sense. Cheyenne's an actual real city, plus it's crazy close to Denver.
I'm sure the automotive industry is going to cater to the 16 people who live in Wyoming and make models exclusively for the state.
Okay crazy close as in probably any contemporary EV could do there and back on a single charge, or with a quick charge before the return.Maybe it's crazy close as any two sizable Mountain Time Zone cities could be, but still 2 hours apart.
This stupidity genuinely makes me mad. I think there are valid critiques when it comes to completely phasing out gas cars, but these people are not interested in that at all. They just want to annoy people and make it seem like absolutely no outside influence can reach them because they have everything figured out. In the process they harm any rational stance that is even remotely similar to theirs.Modern American conservatism is mental illness.Wyoming Republicans take a stand, want to ban electric cars
As childish legislative stunts go, this one is certainly pathetic.arstechnica.com
Death throes vibes.This stupidity genuinely makes me mad. I think there are valid critiques when it comes to completely phasing out gas cars, but these people are not interested in that at all. They just want to annoy people and make it seem like absolutely no outside influence can reach them because they have everything figured out. In the process they harm any rational stance that is even remotely similar to theirs.
And then on top of it they're hypocrites for trying to remove a perfectly valid type of vehicle from the market while supposedly being champions of freedom.
Malcolm? Is that you?You're Not The Boss Of Me!
Yes.Malcolm? Is that you?
For the longest time I thought that economic cooperation between the US and China was the best way to keep tensions cool and it is definitely still a factor. Specifically, getting them to invest in our economy, on our shores, with our workers, and especially following our business rules is a pretty big deal. They basically don't have business rules in China so the more often we can get them to play by our rules the better. In that way I'm actually not a fan of shutting such doors.At some point, I understand why we don't want to give China too many manufacturing factories here. We buy enough stuff from them and giving an economy like theirs too much leeway in our business isn't a great idea. They support all sorts of highly questionable regimes and their human rights make the US look like Fantasyland by comparison. They buy up tons of infrastructure in third-world nations knowing they'll default on those loans to strike more favorable deals. If we're going to stuck with the environmental problems a factory presents, at least we should have some control of that future.
We can go on about how folks can retrain themselves for better lives, but for 95% of the rural or blue-collar population, that's asking way too much from a society that typically moves at a more incremental and repetitive pace, and rewards a different attitude where firm expectations are expected to be kept. Or that politicians, policy makers, think tanks, corporations, and banks are in a constant orgy which is damned well shamelessly public...but at least that loop is our choice and the responsibility beholden to folks with a stake and a semblance of pride in the outcome.
So...I agree with shutting that door. But we have to gird up and provide that alternative instead of screwing around with this trade gap to make nice with a nation that doesn't need us as much as we may think.
Private enterprise doesn't serve dubious national interest and a state actor enacting a swift veto of private interest for political purposes is a bad thing regardless of...erm..."justification" (that's not the word I'm looking for but it'll have to do).At some point, I understand why we don't want to give China too many manufacturing factories here. We buy enough stuff from them and giving an economy like theirs too much leeway in our business isn't a great idea. They support all sorts of highly questionable regimes and their human rights make the US look like Fantasyland by comparison. They buy up tons of infrastructure in third-world nations knowing they'll default on those loans to strike more favorable deals. If we're going to stuck with the environmental problems a factory presents, at least we should have some control of that future.
We can go on about how folks can retrain themselves for better lives, but for 95% of the rural or blue-collar population, that's asking way too much from a society that typically moves at a more incremental and repetitive pace, and rewards a different attitude where firm expectations are expected to be kept. Or that politicians, policy makers, think tanks, corporations, and banks are in a constant orgy which is damned well shamelessly public...but at least that loop is our choice and the responsibility beholden to folks with a stake and a semblance of pride in the outcome.
So...I agree with shutting that door. But we have to gird up and provide that alternative instead of screwing around with this trade gap to make nice with a nation that doesn't need us as much as we may think.