LOLWhen it comes to American sodas, the alternate flavors can be summed up like this:
Cherry: Extra sugar
Creme Soda: Double extra sugar with a tiny amount of vanilla extract
Vanilla: Slightly less extra sugar, but with enough vanilla extract to make it taste like sediment
Lemon-Lime: Triple extra sugar
Orange: Triple extra sugar with a bit of citric acid
Grape: Industrial waste
Mountain Dew alternate flavors are sort of an exception because the flavor is masked by enough caffiene to cause a tension headache if you drink it too fast.
Sounds like the worst happened.Last night, I've finally got around to try out Dr. Pepper. Found a local place that sold a variety of the brand's sodas. Wasn't sure which one was the original flavour, so I grabbed the nearest one, which turned out to be "Creme Soda". And my verdict is...
Americans, I gotta say, that was rather disappointing. The flavouring was flat and meh for a fizzy drink. Wasn't worth the extra coin needed to buy it (the drinks were imported from the US of A, and one can of Dr. Pepper cost over four times a comparable can of local soda.)
I'll try other flavours in due course, but that first impression... Hmm.
... that wealthy smugglers could keep their own pockets lined, after one of the richest companies on Earth threatened to undercut them courtesy of a big-ass economic bailout from government. And you needed the French to do it.We literally fought a war so...
Joe Biden's memory is probably shorter than a Liz Truss leadership.Queen Elizabeth ruled for so long that we probably just forgot how coronations were even done.
Cherry Coke is still my favourite drink of all time. Even above tea and water.
#BostonTeaParty2023I would love it if Biden just tweeted out #NotMyKing #AbolishTheMonarchy though.
Is it that good? The same local place where I bought Dr. Pepper also sells Cherry Coke, you see. I never liked other flavours of Coke besides the original, so I'm a bit hesitant to try out.Cherry Coke is still my favourite drink of all time.
The origin story that we deserve.... that wealthy smugglers could keep their own pockets lined, after one of the richest companies on Earth threatened to undercut them courtesy of a big-ass economic bailout from government. And you needed the French to do it.
Well he'll probably be invited to vacation on a yacht.And what will happen to Thomas? Not a damn thing.
The origin story that we deserve.
And what will happen to Thomas? Not a damn thing.
Completely unrelated. California needs to introduced an updated, graduated property tax which, at its highest tier, at least doubles residential property taxes on the type of properties you see in Atherton and Beverly Hills. If these communities won't allow rezoning for denser housing developments to help cure homelessness, then they need to pay up in cash to help cure homelessness.I've been to Harlan Crow's house.
Our Property Tax (council tax) is different to my neighbour next door. Our house is in a higher band because we have a side passage which leads to our yard and by having this our house is wider by 3 feet.Completely unrelated. California needs to introduced an updated, graduated property tax which, at its highest tier, at least doubles residential property taxes on the type of properties you see in Atherton and Beverly Hills. If these communities won't allow rezoning for denser housing developments to help cure homelessness, then they need to pay up in cash to help cure homelessness.
I think nationwide, property taxes should vary based on some combination of property value, the owner's net worth, the owner's income and capital gains, as well as the amount of time the owner spends actually living in the property. That methodology would particularly attack extremely wealthy foreign citizens who own American property as investments to artificially increase property values while removing stock from locals who may want it or need it. It should be prohibitively expensive to leave residential property unoccupied by an owner or renter, yet my understanding is this is relatively commonplace in California.
Ideally, nothing should be prohibitively expensive on purpose. While I imagine it's not very common I happen to know someone who could be deeply effected by your tax idea without being extremely wealthy. This is someone with various medical conditions who relies on specialist doctors and has developed professional relationships with them. At the same time this person is looking to move to another, cheaper state. In the long term new doctors will need to be found, but in the short we considered keeping a property in the old state that would be vacant most of the time to provide a convenient location to use when making trips back to see the old doctors. It's not strictly necessary, there are other options certainly, and we may not end up going down this route, but I really hate seeing obstacles like this because a problem was tackled with a hyper focus on one goal (get the rich) without really considering other effects.It should be prohibitively expensive to leave residential property unoccupied by an owner or renter, yet my understanding is this is relatively commonplace in California.
This is actually the case. The more densely populated the area "wants" to be based on aggregate demand, the higher the property value of the land and houses within that area. Since property tax scales with the property value, these houses are indeed taxed at double the amount of other properties. In fact, much more than double when you look outside of the city.Completely unrelated. California needs to introduced an updated, graduated property tax which, at its highest tier, at least doubles residential property taxes on the type of properties you see in Atherton and Beverly Hills. If these communities won't allow rezoning for denser housing developments to help cure homelessness, then they need to pay up in cash to help cure homelessness.
It's more like the opposite. If you're renting a place out, staying there for too much of the year can cause you to pay extra tax.I think nationwide, property taxes should vary based on some combination of property value, the owner's net worth, the owner's income and capital gains, as well as the amount of time the owner spends actually living in the property. That methodology would particularly attack extremely wealthy foreign citizens who own American property as investments to artificially increase property values while removing stock from locals who may want it or need it. It should be prohibitively expensive to leave residential property unoccupied by an owner or renter, yet my understanding is this is relatively commonplace in California.
Good luck with that. CA probably has the cheapest property tax in the nation, adjusted for property value.Completely unrelated. California needs to introduced an updated, graduated property tax which, at its highest tier, at least doubles residential property taxes on the type of properties you see in Atherton and Beverly Hills. If these communities won't allow rezoning for denser housing developments to help cure homelessness, then they need to pay up in cash to help cure homelessness.
I think nationwide, property taxes should vary based on some combination of property value, the owner's net worth, the owner's income and capital gains, as well as the amount of time the owner spends actually living in the property. That methodology would particularly attack extremely wealthy foreign citizens who own American property as investments to artificially increase property values while removing stock from locals who may want it or need it. It should be prohibitively expensive to leave residential property unoccupied by an owner or renter, yet my understanding is this is relatively commonplace in California.